Tres tipos de interacción (3TI) en el aprendizaje en línea de capacidades curriculares y didácticas (CCDs) del profesorado del sistema educativo de Islas Canarias

  1. Alegre de la Rosa, Olga María
  2. Villar Angulo, Luis Miguel
Revista:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X 2174-5374

Año de publicación: 2011

Título del ejemplar: Competencias mediadas

Volumen: 14

Número: 2

Páginas: 19-42

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/EDUCXX1.14.2.234 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_opene-spacio editor

Otras publicaciones en: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aczel, J. C., Peake; S. R. y Hardy, P. (2008). Designing capacity-building in e-learning expertise: Challenges and strategies. Computers & Education, 50 (2), 499-510.
  • Artino, A. R. y Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12 (3-4), 146-151.
  • Bernard, R. M.; Abrami, P. C.; Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A.; Tamim, R. M.; Surkes, M. A. y Bethel, E. C. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243-1289.
  • Bernard, R. M.; Abrami, P. C.; Lou, Y.; Borokhovski, E.; Wade, A.; Wozney, L.; Wallet, P. A.; Fiset, M. y Huang, B. (2004). How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379-439.
  • Booth, T.; Ainscow, M.; Black-Hawkins, K.; Vaughan, M. y Shaw, L. (2000). Índice de Inclusión. Desarrollando el aprendizaje y la participación en las escuelas. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education (CSIE).
  • Chen, Ch.-H. (2010). Promoting college students' knowledge acquisition and ill-structured problem solving: Web-based integration and procedure prompts. Computers & Education, 55 (1), 292-303.
  • Conole, G.; Dyke, M.; Oliver, M. y Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education, 43 (1-2), 17-33.
  • De Kock, A.; Sleegers, P. y Voeten, M. J. M. (2004). New Learning and the Classification of Learning Environments in Secondary Education. Review of Educational Research, 74 (2), 141-170.
  • Fowler, C. y Mayes, T. (1999). Learning relationships: from theory to design. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 7 (3), 6-16.
  • Gabriel, M. A. y Kaufield, K. J. (2008). Reciprocal mentorship: an effective support for online instructors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16 (3), 311-327.
  • Jara, M. y Mellar, H. (2010). Quality enhancement for e-learning courses: The role of student feedback. Computers & Education, 54 (3), 709-714.
  • Marjoribanks, K. (1980). School Environment Scale. Adelaide: Jan Press.
  • Phelps, R.; Hase, S. y Ellis, A. (2005). Competency, capability, complexity and computers: exploring a new model for conceptualising end-user computer education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (1), 67-84.
  • Sáinz, M. y López-Sáez, M. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54 (2), 578-587.
  • Shee, D.Y. y Wang, Y.-S. (2008). Multicriteria evaluation of the web-based elearning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50 (3), 894-905.
  • Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S.J.H., Hwang, W. Y. y Zhang, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, in press, 1-15.
  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K.; Thomas, J. A.; Lan, W. Y.; Cooper, S.; Ahern, T. C.; Shaw, S. M. y Liu, X. (2006). Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 76 (1), 93-135.
  • Villa, A. (1980). El clima escolar en los centros de E. G. B. de Vizcaya, medido a través del S. E. S., en: Villa, A. y Villar, L. M. (Coords.). Clima organizativo y de aula. Teorías, modelos e instrumentos de medida. Bilbao: Servicio Central de Publicaciones. Gobierno Vasco, 119-134.
  • Villar, L. M. (Dir.) (2004). Capacidades docentes para una gestión de calidad en Educación Secundaria. Madrid: Mc-Graw-Hill.
  • Villar, L.M. (Coord.) (2009). Creación de la Excelencia en Educación Secundaria. Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Villar, L. M. y Alegre, O. M. (2008). Measuring Faculty Learning in Curriculum and Teaching Competence (CTC) Online Courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 16 (2), 169-181.
  • Vovides, Y.; Sanchez-Alonso, S.; Mitropoulou, V. y Nickmans, G. (2007). The use of e-learning course management systems to support learning strategies and to improve self-regulated learning. Educational Research Review, 2, 64-74.
  • Wei, M.; den Brok, P. y Zhou, Y. (2009). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and student achievement in English as a Foreign Language classrooms in China. Learning Environments Research, 12, 157-174.
  • Young, A. y Lewis, Ch.W. (2008). Teacher education programmes delivered at a distance: An examination of distance student perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (3), 601-609.