Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario Conductas Discriminatorias hacia la Vejez y el Envejecimiento (CONDUC-ENV)análisis del componente conductual de actitudes viejistas en ancianos

  1. Carmen Luisa Castellano Fuentes
  2. Adelia de Miguel Negredo
International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

ISSN: 1577-7057

Year of publication: 2011

Volume: 11

Issue: 3

Pages: 359-375

Type: Article

More publications in: International journal of psychology and psychological therapy


Cited by

  • Dialnet Metrics Cited by: 4 (02-06-2023)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2011
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.551
  • Best Quartile: Q2
  • Area: Clinical Psychology Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 88/266
  • Area: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 78/127
  • Area: Developmental and Educational Psychology Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 153/293


  • Social Sciences: B

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2011
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 1.8
  • Area: Clinical Psychology Percentile: 61
  • Area: Developmental and Educational Psychology Percentile: 47
  • Area: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Percentile: 30


Psychometric properties of the questionnaire Discriminatory Behavior towards Old Age and Aging (CONDUC-ENV): Analysis of the ageist attitudes behavioral component in elderly population. This study aims to present the psychometric properties of the CONDUC-ENV questionnaire. It is a questionnaire that evaluates the perception of ageism behaviors by older persons. The sample consists of 117 people over the age of 52 years (107 women, 10 men) without health problems and with a high degree of autonomy. Factorial analysis results reflect the ageism behaviors are grouped into other negative and positive factors. The differential analysis indicates that the sample of this study does not perceive ageism negative discrimination by the rest of the population. Also, the psychometric properties of the questionnaire are acceptable and it is offered as a useful tool for research.

Bibliographic References

  • Atchley RC (1997). Social forces and aging (8th Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Berelson B y Steiner GA (1964). Human behavior. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace.
  • Berry DS y McArthur LZ (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Pychological Bulletin, 100, 3-18.
  • Braithwaite VA (1986). Old age stereotypes: Reconciling contradictions. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 342-360.
  • Bultena GL y Powers EA (1978). Denial of aging: Age identification and reference group orientations. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 748-754.
  • Butler RN (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. Gerontologist, 9, 243-246.
  • Butler RN (1994). Dispelling ageism: The cross-cutting intervention. En D Schenk y WA Achenbaum (Eds.), Changing perceptions of aging and the aged. Nueva York: Springer.
  • Caporael LR, Lukaszewski MP y Culbertson GH (1983). Secondary baby talk: Judgments by institutionalized elderly and their caregivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 746-754.
  • Caporael LR y Culbertson GR (1986). Verbal response modes of baby talk and other speech at institutions for the aged. Languages and Communication, 6, 99-112.
  • Castellano CL (2008). Componentes cognitivos, conductuales y afectivos del viejismo y su interacción con el funcionamiento psicológico en la población anciana. Serie Tesis Doctorales: Universidad de La Laguna.
  • Castellano CL y de Miguel A (2010). Estereotipos viejistas en ancianos: actualización de la estructura factorial y propiedades psicométricas de dos cuestionarios pioneros. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 10, 259-278.
  • Chafetz PK, Holmes H, Lande K, Childress E y Glazer HR (1998). Older adults and the news media: Utilization, opinions, and preferred reference terms. Gerontologist, 38, 481-489.
  • Coupland N, Coupland J y Giles H (1991). Language, society and the elderly: Discourse, identity, and ageing. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
  • Covey HC (1988). Historical terminology used to represent older people. Gerontologist, 28, 291-297.
  • Craig GJ y Baucum D (2001). Desarrollo psicológico. México: Pearson Educación.
  • De Miguel A y Castellano CL (en revisión). Evaluación del componente afectivo de las actitudes viejistas en la población anciana: Escala sobre el Prejuicio hacia la Vejez y el Envejecimiento (PREJ-ENV).
  • De Miguel A (2011). Maltrato de los ancianos en el ámbito familiar. En P García, JM Bethencourt, E Sola, AR Martín y E Armas (eds.). Violencia y Psicología Comunitaria. Aspectos psicosociales, clínicos y legales. Granada: Ed. Comares. ISBN: 978-84-9836826-0.
  • Ekerdt DJ (1986). The busy ethic: Moral continuity between work and retirement. Gerontologist, 26, 239-244.
  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE y McHugh, PR (1975). The Mini-Mental State. A practical guide for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
  • Gerike AE (1990). On gray hair and oppressed brains. Journal of women and aging, 2, 35-46.
  • Herzog AR y Morgan, JN (1992). Age and gender differences in the value of productive activities. Research on aging, 14, 169-198.
  • Hummert ML (1994). Physiognomic cues and the activation of stereotypes of the elderly in interaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 5-20.
  • Kelly JR (1993). Activity and aging. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Kimmel DC (1988). Ageism, psychology, and public policy. American Psychologist, 43, 175-178.
  • Kite M y Johnson B (1988). Attitudes toward older and younger adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 3, 233-244.
  • Knox VJ, Gekoski WL y Johnson EA (1986). Contact with and perceptions of the elderly. The Gerontologist, 26, 309-313.
  • Laws G (1995). Understanding ageism: Lessons from feminism and postmodernism. Gerontologist, 35, 112-118.
  • Lee K, Volans PJ y Gregory N (2003). Trainee clinical psychologists’ view on recruitment to work with older people. Ageing & Society, 23, 83-97.
  • Lobo A, Saz P, Marcos G y Grupo ZARADEMP (2002). MMSE. Examen cognoscitivo mini-mental. Manual. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, SA.
  • Macionis JJ (1998). Sociology (4th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • McArthur LZ (1982). Judging a book by its cover: A cognitive analysis of the relationship between physical appearance and stereotyping. En A Hastorf y A Isen (Eds.), Cognitive social psychology. Nueva York: Elsevier North-Holland.
  • Melamed E (1983). Mirror, mirror: The terror of not being young. Nueva York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Montoro J (1998). Actitudes hacia las personas mayores y discriminación basada en la edad. Revista multidisciplinar de gerontología, 8, 21-30.
  • Morales JF (Coord.) (1999). Psicología Social. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Moss MS y Lawton MP (1982). Time budgets of older people: A window of four lifestyles. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 115-123.
  • Nelson TD (2002). Ageism: stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Osgood CE, Suci GJ y Tannenbaum PH (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Palmore EB (1977). Facts on aging: A short quiz. The Gerontologist, 17, 315-320.
  • Palmore EB (1999). Ageism: negative and positive. (2ª ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
  • Palmore EB (2001). The Ageism Survey: First findings. Gerontologist, 41, 572-575.
  • Pasupathi M y Löckenhoff CE (2002). Ageist behavior. En T.D. Nelson (ed.). Ageism. Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Perdue CW y Gurtman MB (1990). Evidence for the automaticity of ageism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 199-216.
  • Pfeiffer E y Davis GC (1971). The use of leisure time in middle life. Gerontologist, 11, 187-195.
  • Quinn J (1987). Attitudes of professionals toward the aged. En G Maddox (Ed.), The encyclopedia of aging. New York: Springer.
  • Rosencranz HA y McNevin MA (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 9, 55-59.
  • Roy A y Harwood J (1997). Underrepresented, positively portrayed: Older adults in televisión commercials. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 39-56.
  • Salvarezza L (1998). Psicogeriatría. Teoría y clínica. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
  • Santos JF y VandenBos GR (1982). Psychology and the older adult: Challenges for training in the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
  • Slotterback CS y Saarnio DA (1996). Attitudes toward the elderly reported by young adults. Variation based on attitudinal task and attribute categories. Psychology and Aging, 11, 563-571.
  • Triadó C y Villar F (1997). Modelos de envejecimiento y percepción de cambios en una muestra de personas mayores. Anuario de Psicología, 73, 43-55.
  • Vesperi M (1994). Perspectives on aging in print journalism. En D Schenk y WA Achenbaum (Eds.), Changing perceptions of aging and the Aged. Nueva York: Springer.
  • Walker A (1993). Edad y Actitudes. Bruselas, Comisión Europea, DGV.
  • Wilkinson JA y Ferraro KF (2002). Thirty years of ageism research. En TD Nelson (ed.). Ageism. Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge: The MIT Press.