La Escala de Competencia y Resilencia Parental para madres y padres en contextos de riesgo psicosocial

  1. Martín Araujo, Juan Carlos
  2. Cabrera Casimiro, Eduardo
  3. León González-Vélez, Jaime
  4. López, María José Rodrigo
Journal:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728 1695-2294

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 29

Issue: 3

Pages: 886-896

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.29.3.150981 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Anales de psicología

Metrics

Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 16 (30-01-2024)
  • Dialnet Métricas Cited by: 14 (25-02-2024)
  • Web of Science Cited by: 15 (19-12-2023)
  • Dimensions Cited by: 13 (19-01-2024)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Year 2013
  • Journal Impact Factor: 0.549
  • Journal Impact Factor without self cites: 0.299
  • Article influence score: 0.103
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 92/129 (Ranking edition: SSCI)
  • Area: PSYCHOLOGY Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 63/74 (Ranking edition: SCIE)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Year 2013
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.357
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Psychology (miscellaneous) Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 123/239

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Year 2013
  • Journal Impact: 0.880
  • Field: PSICOLOGÍA Quartile: C1 Rank in field: 9/105

CIRC

  • Social Sciences: A

Scopus CiteScore

  • Year 2013
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 1.1
  • Area: Psychology (all) Percentile: 40

Dimensions

(Data updated as of 19-01-2024)
  • Total citations: 13
  • Recent citations (2 years): 5
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 1.54

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a scale to assess paren-tal competence and resilience in psychosocial risk contexts. The research was conducted with 63 professionals from the Gran Canaria social ser-vices, (Canary Islands, Spain) over 498 cases of at-risk families. The factor structure was obtained by Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) with oblimin rotation, and the estimation method using the Weighted Least Squares with moving measurement window (WLSMW) for confirmatory purposes. The mothers scale showed a structure of five fac-tors with 44 items: Personal Development and Resilience, Household Or-ganization, Seek of Support, Educational Competence, and Community Competence. These factors showed good internal consistency (ordinal al-pha ranging from .70 to .97). The fathers scale consisted of 4 factors with 32 items: Personal Development and Resilience, Educational and House-hold Organization Competence, Community Competence, Seek of sup-port. These factors showed good internal consistency with ordinal alpha ranging from .68 to .97. The results suggested that the questionnaire, in its double version for mothers and fathers, captures the specificities of each parental role and showed sound psychometric properties that make it suit-able for the social services field

Bibliographic References

  • Abidin, R. R. (1983). Parenting Stress Index Manual. Charlotesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.
  • Asparouhov T. y Muthén B. (2009). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397-438.
  • Asparouhov T. y Muthén B. (2010). Multiple Imputation with Mplus. Recuperado de http://www.statmodel.com/download/Imputations7.pdf
  • Azar, S. T. (1998). Parenting and child maltreatment. En I. E. Sigel and K. A. Renninger (Volume 4. Eds.), Child Psychology in practice (pp. <page type=first>361</page>-<page type=last>388</page>). Handbook of Child Psychology. (5th edition) (W. Damon, Ed.). New York: John Wiley y Sons.
  • Azar, S. T. y Cote, L. R. (2002). Sociocultural issues in the evaluation of the needs of children in custody decision making: What do our current frameworks for evaluating parenting practices have to offer? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 193-217.
  • Barber, J. G., y Delfabbro, P. H. (2000). The assessment of parenting in child protection cases. Research in Social Work Practice, 10, 243-256.
  • Barudy J. y Dantagnan M. (2010a). Los desafíos invisibles de ser madre o padre. Manual de evaluación de las competencias y la resiliencia parental. Barcelona: Gedisa editorial.
  • Barudy J. y Dantagnan M. (2010b). Guía de evaluación de competencias parentales. Recuperado de http://j.mp/wCvsKn
  • Bayot, A. y Hernández J. V. (2008). Evaluación de la competencia parental. Madrid. CEPE. S. L.
  • Brown, B. M. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guildford.
  • Byrne B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications and programming. Second Edition. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
  • Comité de Ministros a los Estados Miembros: Recomendación Rec 19 (2006). Políticas de apoyo al ejercicio positivo de la parentalidad. Recuperado de http://www.msps.es/politicaSocial/familiasInfancia/docs/recomendacion.pdfhttp://www.coe.int/t/dg3/youthfamily
  • Daly, M. (2007). Parenting in contemporary Europe: a positive approach. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publications.
  • De Paúl, J., y Arruabarrena, M. I. (1999). Escalas de Binestar Infantil de Magura y Moses. Un primer estudio para la validación de la versión española. Intervención Psicosocial. Revista sobre Igualdad y Calidad de Vida, 8, 89-107.
  • Department of Health, Department for Education and Employment and Home Office (2000). Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Díaz-Herrero A., Brito de la Nuez A., López P. J. A., Pérez-López J. Y Martínez-Fuentes, M. T. (2010). Estructura factorial y consistencia interna de la versión española del Parenting Stress Index-Short Form. Psicothema, 22, 1033-1038.
  • Dubowitz H. (2006). Where's dad? A need to understand father's role in child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 461-465.
  • Dubowitz H. (2009). Commentary on fathers and children and maltreatment. Child Maltreatment, 14, 291-293.
  • Elousa, P. (2003). Sobre la validez de los tests. Psicothema, 15, 315-321.
  • Elousa P. O. y Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20, 896-901.
  • Flora D. B. y Curran P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological methods, 9, 466-491.
  • Gómez M. E. (2010). El desafío de evaluar familias desde un enfoque ecosistémico: nuevos aportes a la confiabilidad y validez de las escalas NCFAS. En L. Lira (Ed.), Familia y Diversidad (pp. 95-126). Santiago de Chile: Fundación San José para la Adopción.
  • Hayashi, K., Bentler, P. M. y Yuan, K. H. (2007). On the likelihood ratio test for the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 505-526.
  • Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Convectional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Johnson M. A., Stone S., Lou C., Vu, C., Ling J., Mizrahi P. y Austin M. (2006). Family Assessment in Child Welfare Services: Instrument comparisons. En http://cssr.berkeley.edu/bassc/public/BASSC_FamilyAssessment_FULL_REPORT091406.pdf
  • Johnston, Ch. y Mash, E.J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 167-175.
  • Lamb, M. E. (2010). The role of the father in child development. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd Ed.). New York: Guilford press.
  • Lerman R. I. (2010). Capabilities and Contributions of Unwed Fathers. The Future of Children, 20, 63-85
  • Lewis, C. y Lamb, M. E. (2003). Fathers' influences on children's development: the evidence from two-parent families. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 17, 211-228.
  • Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E. y Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4, 73-79.
  • Luthar, S. S. (2003). Resilience and vulnerability. Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Máiquez, M. L., Rodrigo, M. J., Capote, C. y Vermaes, I. (2000). Aprender en la vida cotidiana. Un programa experiencial para padres. Madrid: Visor.
  • Magura, S., y Moses, B. (1986). Outcome measures for child welfare services. Washington, D.C.: Child Welfare League of America.
  • Marsh H.W., Muthén B., Asparouhov T., Lüdtke, O. Robitzsch A. Morin A. y Trautwein U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of University Teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439-476.
  • Masten, A. S., y Curtis, W. J. (2000). Integrating competence and psychopathology: Pathways toward a comprehensive science of adaption in development. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 529-550.
  • Menéndez, S., Jiménez, L. e Hidalgo, M. V. (en prensa). Estructura factorial de la escala PSOC (Parental Sense of Competence) en una muestra de madres ususarias de servicios de preservación familiar. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación.
  • Minuchin, P., Colapinto, J. y Minuchin, S. (2000). Pobreza, institución y familia. Buenos Aires: Ed. Amorrortu.
  • Muthén, B. O., du Toit, S. H. C., y Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Recuperado de www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article_075.pdf
  • Muthén, L. K. y Muthén B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus User's Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén y Muthén.
  • Reed-Ashcraft, K., Kirk, R. S. y Fraser, M. W. (2001). The reliability and validity of the North Carolina Family Assessment Scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(4), 503-520.
  • Reder, P., Duncan, S. y Lucey, C. (2003). Studies in the assessment of parenting. New York: Routlegde
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez, M. L., Correa, A. D., Martín, J. C., y Rodríguez, G. (2006). Outcome evaluation of a community centre-based program for mothers at high psychosocial risk. Child Abuse and Neglect, 39, 1049-1064.
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez M. L., Martín J. C. y Byrne S. (2008). Preservación Familiar. Un enfoque positivo para la intervención con familias. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Martín J. C. Cabrera, E. y Máiquez, M. L. (2009). Las competencias parentales en contextos de riesgo psicosocial. Intervención Psicosocial, 18, 113-120.
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez M. L. y Martín J. C. (2010a). Parentalidad positiva y políticas locales de apoyo a las familias. Madrid: Publicaciones de la Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias (FEMP).
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez M. L. y Martá-n J. C. (2010b). La educación parental como recurso psicoeducativo para promover la parentalidad positiva. Madrid: Publicaciones de la Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias (FEMP).
  • Rose, W. (2010). The Assessment Framework. En Horwath J. (Ed.), The Child's World. The comprehensive Guide to Assessing Children in Need (pp. 34-55). Second Edition. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Rosenberg, J. y Bradford, W. (2006). The importance of fathers in the healthy development of children. U. S. Children's Bureau Office on Child Abuse and Neglect. Recuperado de http://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/fatherhood/fatherhood.pdf
  • Rosenberg, J., y Wilcox, W. B. (2006). The Importance of Fathers in the Healthy Development of Children. Child Abuse and Neglect User Manual Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect.
  • Schene, P. (2005). Comprehensive Family Assessment Guidelines for Child Welfare. National Child Welfare Resource Center for Family-Centered Practice. Recuperado de http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/family_assessment/
  • Schmitt T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 304-321.
  • Stapleton, L. M. (2006). An assessment of practical solutions for structural equation modeling with complex sample data. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 28-58.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. y Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Fifth Edition. Boston: Pearson Educations, Inc.
  • Tamis-Lemonda C. y McFadden K. (2010). Fathers from low-income backgrounds: Myths and Evidence. En Michael E. Lamb (Ed.), The Role of the father in child development (pp. 296-318). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Walsh, F. (2004). Resiliencia Familiar. Estrategias para su fortalecimiento. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores.
  • Waters, E. y Sroufe, L.A. (1983). Social competence as a developmental construct. Developmental Review, 3, 79-97.
  • White, A. (2005). Assessment of parenting capacity. Literature review. Centre for Parenting and Research. Ashfield, Australia: Department of Community Services.
  • Worthington, R. L. y Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806-838
  • Yang, Y. y Green, S. B. (2010). A note on structural equation modelling estimates of reliability. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 66-81.
  • Yárnoz, S. (2006). Seguimos descuidando a los padres? El papel del padre en la dinámica familiar y su influencia en el bienestar psíquico de sus componentes. Anales de Psicología, 22, 175-185.