"Learning together, growing with family"the implementation and evaluation of a family support programme

  1. Pere Amorós 1
  2. Sonia Byrne 2
  3. Ainoa Mateos Inchaurrondo 1
  4. Eduard Vaquero Tió 1
  5. Anna Mundet Bolós 1
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

  2. 2 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Journal:
Psychosocial Intervention

ISSN: 1132-0559

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 25

Issue: 2

Pages: 87-93

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.PSI.2016.02.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Abstract

The "Learning together, growing with family" programme is targeted to at-risk parents and children from 6 to 11 years old, with a preventive focus on promoting positive parent-child relationships. In this study, we examined the quality of the programme implementation and its influence on the programme results in a sample of 425 parents and 138 facilitators drawn from the first trial. Mixed methods were used, consisting of: parental self-reports on parenting dimensions, professionals' records on parental attendance and appraisals on six topics of the implementation process, and focus group discussions in which facilitators reported on the initial steps of the implementation. Results showed a high quality of implementation with respect to the group facilitator and the programme organization factors, followed by the coordination with services and the support facilities offered to participants and, finally, by the factors of fidelity and prior organization steps. Results of the focus groups confirmed that the prior steps were challenging and offered the more effective strategies. Better quality in the implementation factors predicted better parenting styles and parental competencies after the programme, as well as a higher attendance rate. In sum, this study demonstrates the importance of good implementation in at-risk contexts and provides some clues as to the key elements that moderate programme effectiveness.

Bibliographic References

  • Alonso, J., & Román, J. M. (2003). PEF: Escalas de identificación de “prácticas educativasfamiliares”. Madrid: Editorial Cepe.
  • Amorós, P., Balsells, M. A., Buisan, M., Byrne, S., & Fuentes-Peláez, N. (2013).Implementation and evaluation of the “Learning Together, Growing In Fam-ily Programme”: The Impact on the families. Revista de Cercetare si InterventieSociala, 42, 120–144.
  • Amorós, P., Balsells, M. A., Fuentes-Peláez, N., Mateos, A., & Pastor, C. (2015). Apren-der juntos, crecer en familia. Un enfoque integral. In M. A. J. Rodrigo (Ed.), ManualPráctico de parentalidad positiva (pp. 111–130). Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Amorós, P., Balsells, M. A., Fuentes-Peláez, N., Mateos, A., & Pastor, C. (2011). Appren-dre ensemble, grandir en famille”. Programme de soutien socio-éducatif. LaRevue Internationale de l’Education Familiale (RIEF), 30, 61–80.
  • Amorós, P., Rodrigo, M. J., Fuentes-Peláez, N., Mateos, A., Pastor, C., Byrne, S., et al.(2011). Aprender juntos crecer en familia. Barcelona: Obra social “la Caixa”.
  • Amorós, P., Balsells, M. A., Fuentes-Peláez, N., Molina, C., Mateos, A., & Pastor, C.(2011). L’attenzione alle famiglie in situazione di vulnerabilità. Rivista Italianadi Educazione Familiare, 2, 37–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.13128/RIEF-9391
  • Amorós, P., Palacios, J., Fuentes, N., León, E., & Mesas, A. (2003). Familias Canguro. Unaexperiencia de protección a la infancia. Colección Estudios Sociales n. 13. Barcelona:Fundación “la Caixa”.
  • Amorós, P., K˜nallinsky, E., Martin, J. C., & Fuentes-Peláez, N. (2011). La formation etles recherches en éducation familiare en Espagne. In E. Catarsi, & J. P. Pourtois(Eds.), Les formations et les recherches en Éducation familiare. Etat des lieux enEurope et au Quebec (pp. 120–132). Paris: Harmatan.
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. Baker, C. N., Arnold, D. H., & Meagher, S. (2011). Enrollment and attendance in aparent training prevention program for conduct problems. Prevention Science,12, 126–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0187-0
  • Balsells, A., Amorós, P., Fuentes-Peláez, N., & Mateos, A. (2011). Needs analysis fora parental guidance program for biological family: Spain’s current situation.Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 34, 21–37.
  • Barth, R. P. (2009). Preventing child abuse and neglect with parent training: Evidenceand opportunities. The Future of Children, 19, 95–118.
  • Brewer, M., Browne, J., Joyce, R., & Payne, J. (2011). Child and working-age povertyfrom 2010 to 2020. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  • Byrne, S. (2010). Evaluación del Programa de Apoyo Personal y Familiar para familias ensituación de riesgo psicosocial en la Junta de Castilla y León (Unpublished DoctoralDissertation). Spain: University of La Laguna.
  • Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quanti-tative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rded.). London: Sage Publications.
  • Durlak, J., & Dupre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research onthe influence if implementation on program outcomes and factors affectingimplementation. Annual Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implemen-tation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida,Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National ImplementationResearch Network.
  • Gómez, E., & Kotliarenco, M. A. (2010). Resiliencia Familiar: Un enfoque de investi-gación e intervención con familias multiproblemáticas. Revista de Psicología, 19,103–131.
  • Gutiérrez, J. (2008). Dinámica del grupo de discusión. Madrid: Centro de Investiga-ciones Sociológicas.Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2008). Metodología de la investigación.México: McGraw-Hill.
  • Jones, T. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in par-ent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341–363.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004
  • Johnston, C., & Mash, E. J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction andefficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 167–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1802 8
  • Kumpfer, K. L., & Alvardo, R. (2003). Family-strengthening approaches for the pre-vention of youth problem behaviors. American Psychologist, 58, 457–465.
  • Lyon, A., Stirman, S., Kerns, S., & Bruns, E. (2011). Developing the mental health work-force: Review and application of training approaches from multiple disciplines.Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental health Services Research,38, 238–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0331-y
  • Maccoby, E. E. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In J.E. Grusec, & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research(pp. 13–41). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Mason, C. A., Walker-Barnes, C. J., Tu, S., Simons, J., & Martinez-Arrue, R.(2004). Ethnic differences in the affective meaning of parental controlbehaviors. Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 59–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPP.0000039939.83804.37
  • Menéndez, S., Jiménez, L., & Hidalgo, M. V. (2011). Estructura factorial de la escalaPSOC (Parental Sense of Competence) en una muestra de madres usuarias deservicios de preservación familiar. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Eval-uación Psicológica, 44, 133–148.
  • Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrat-ing diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (2a ed.). ThousandOaks: Sage.
  • O’Connor, T. G., & Scott, S. B. C. (2006). Parenting and outcomes for children. York, UK:Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Rodrigo, M. J. (2010). Promoting positive parenting in Europe: New challenges forthe European Society for Developmental Psychology. European Journal of Devel-opmental Psychology, 7, 281–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405621003780200
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Almeida, A., Spiel, C., & Koops, W. (2012). Introduction: Evidence-based parent education programmes to promote positive parenting. EuropeanJournal of Development Psychology, 9, 2–10.
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Byrne, S., & Rodríguez, B. (2013). Parenting styles and child well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh, I. Frønes, F. Casas, & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of childwell-being (pp. 1313–1319). Dordrecht, Holland: Springer.
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez, M. L., & Martín, J. C. (2010). La Educación Parentalcomo recurso psicoeducativo para promover la parentalidad positiva. Madrid:Federación Espa˜nola de Municipios y Provincias (FEMP). Recuperado de:http://www.femp.es/files/566-964-archivo/Folleto%20parentalidad%202.pdf
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Martin, J. C., Mateos, A., Pastor, C., & Guerra, M. (2013). Impact ofthe “Learning Together, Growing In Family” Programme on the professionalsand attention to families services. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 42,145–165.
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. San Francisco: Pearson.
  • Unicef. (2007). Un panorama del bienestar infantil en los países ricos. Pobreza infantilen perspectiva. Report Card n◦7. Florencia: Centro de investigaciones Innocenti.
  • Walsh, F. (2004). Resiliencia familiar: Estrategias para su fortalecimiento. Buenos Aires:Amorrortu.