La privatización del control migratorio y sus críticas

  1. Ana López Sala 1
  2. Dirk Godenau 2
  1. 1 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
    info

    Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02gfc7t72

  2. 2 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Journal:
Crítica penal y poder: una publicación del Observatorio del Sistema Penal y los Derechos Humanos

ISSN: 2014-3753

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 18

Pages: 251-259

Type: Article

Abstract

The increasing participation of non-public actors in the implementation of migration control policies, known as privatization, is one of the innovations of increasing importance in the management of migration flows, with implications for sovereignty, jurisdiction, legitimacy or public accountability. Privatization and outsourcing of services traditionally provided by States has taken various forms and degrees of intensity. In a growing number of countries, States have delegated certain functions to companies that provide services, technology, equipment, knowledge or infrastructure. In other cases, this sub-delegation has involved social organizations and private non-profit foundations. We also observe the forced incorporation of private actors in the implementation of control, as in the case of passenger transport companies. Criticism of privatization focuses on the growing influence of security and technology companies in how States make decisions concerning control policies. There are also concerns about the effects of privatization on the whole of migration policy, due to the pursuit of private profits through the expansion and diversification of control measures, and the effects of cost reductions in the quality of services and goods provided. Criticism includes that these delegation practices can blur the legal responsibility of States and remove their actions from public scrutiny and institutional oversight.

Bibliographic References

  • Bacon, C. (2005): “The Evolution of Immigration Detention in the UK: The involvement of private prison companies”, en Working Papers Series, n. 27.
  • Berndtsson, J. & Kinsey, C. (eds.) (2016): The Routledge Research companion to security outsourcing, London, Routledge.
  • Betts, A. (2013): “The migration industry in global migration governance”, en GammeltoftHansen, T. & Nyberg-Sorensen, N. (eds.). The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration, London, Routledge.
  • Bloom, T. (2015): “The Business of Migration Control: Delegating migration control functions to Private Actors”, en Global Policy, n. 6.
  • Fernandes, D. (2007): Targeted: Homeland Security and the Business of Immigration, New York, Seven Stories Press.
  • Flynn, M. (2016): “Capitalism and Immigration Control: What Political Economy Reveals about the Growth of Detention Systems”, en Global Detention Project Working Paper, n. 16.
  • Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2011): Access to Asylum. International Refugee Law and the Globalization of Migration Control. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2013): “The rise of the private border guard. Accountability and responsibility in the migration control industry”, en Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. & NybergSorensen, N. (eds.), The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration, London, Routledge.
  • Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2016): “Private Security and the migration control industry”, en Abrahamsen, R. & Leander, A. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies, London, Routledge.
  • Godenau, D. & López-Sala, A. (2016): “Multi-layered Migration Deterrence and Technology in Spanish Maritime Border Management”, en Journal of Borderland Studies, n. 31, 2.
  • Gruber, S. (2015): How For-Profit Companies Are Driving Immigration Detention Policies, Washington, Center for American Progress.
  • Guiraudon, V. & Lahav, G. (2000): “A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate. The Case of Migration Control”, en Comparative Political Studies, n. 33, 2.
  • Humphris, R. & Sigona, N. (2019): “Outsourcing the best interests of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the era of austerity”, en Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, n. 45, 2.
  • Kannef, D. (2013): “Privatizing the borders. Human rights and the British visa regime”, en Anthropology Today, n. 29, 2.
  • Lahav, G. (1998): “Immigration and the state: The devolution and privatization of immigration control in the EU”, en Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, n. 24, 4.
  • Lahav, G. (2000): “The rise of non-state actors in migration regulation in the United States and Europe: Changing the gatekeepers or bringing back the State”, en Foner, N. et. al. (eds.), Immigration Research for a New Century: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, New York, Russell-Sage Foundation.
  • Lemberg-Pedersen, M. (2013): “Private security companies and the European bordescapes”, en Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. y Nyberg Sorensen, N. (eds.), The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration. London, Routledge.
  • Lemberg-Pedersen, M. (2018): “Security, Industry, and Migration in European Border Control”, en Weinar, A., Bonjour, S. & Zhyznomirska, L. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe, London, Routledge.
  • López-Sala, A. & Godenau, D. (2016): Non-State Actors and Migration control in Spain. A Migration Industry Perspective. Digital CSIC. http://hdl.handle.net/10261/136847 (acceso 4 de mayo de 2019).
  • López-Sala, A. & Godenau, D. (2017): “Delegando el control migratorio. Una aproximación a las prácticas del outsourcing en España”, en Id., Estados de contención, Estados de detención. El control de la inmigración irregular en España, Barcelona, Anthropos.
  • Luan, L. (2018): Profiting from Enforcement: The Role of Private Prisons in U.S. Immigration Detention, Washington, Migration Policy Institute.
  • McNamara, F. (2013): “Member State Responsibility for Migration Control within Third States. Externalization Revisited”, en European Journal of Migration and Law, n. 15.
  • Menz, G. (2011): “Neoliberalism, Privatisation and the Outsourcing of Migration Management: A Five Country Comparison”, en Competition and Change, n. 15, 2.
  • Menz, G. (2013): “The neoliberalized State and the growth of the migration industry”, en Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. & Nyberg-Sorensen, N. (eds.), The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration, London, Routledge.
  • Rodenhäusen, T. (2014): “Another Brick in the Wall: Carrier Sanctions and the Privatization of Immigration Control”, en International Journal of Refugee Law, n. 26, 2.
  • Rodier, C. (2012): El negocio de la xenofobia, Madrid, Clave Intelectual. Tyler, I., Gill, N., Conlon, D. & Oeppen, C. (2014): “The business of child detention: charitable co-option, migrant advocacy and activist outrage”, en Race and Class, n. 56, 1.
  • Wolff, S. (2016): “The politics of negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: insights from Morocco and Turkey”, en Zaiotti, R. (ed.), Externalizing Migration Management. Europe, North America and the spread of remote control practices, London, Routledge.
  • Zaiotti, R. (ed.) (2016): Externalizing Migration Management. Europe, North America and the spread of remote control practices, Londres, Routledge.
  • Zolberg, A. (2003): “The Archaeology of Remote Control”, en Fahrmeir, A., Faron, O. & Weil, P. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World. The Evolution of State Practices in Europe and the United States from the French Revolution to the Inter-War Period, New York, Berghahn Books.