El síndrome de shock emocional y el síndrome de disrupción socialnuevas propuestas de diagnósticos enfermeros

  1. Pedro Ruymán Brito Brito
Journal:
ENE Revista de Enfermería

ISSN: 1988-348X

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 13

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: ENE Revista de Enfermería

Abstract

Emotional Shock Syndrome and Social Disruption Syndrome: new proposals for nursing diagnoses. NANDA-I suggests the development and proposal of new syndrome type diagnoses. An observational, descriptive, transversal and analytical study was designed. The study was conducted with 188 patients from primary health care nursing practice that were assessed and diagnosed in the psychosocial area administering the Psycho-Social Nursing Diagnosis Questionnaire (PSndQ). Objective: to describe sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the PSndQ diagnoses "Emotional Shock Syndrome" (ESS) and "Social Disruption Syndrome" (SDS) and to classify these aspects as related factors, risk population or associated condition. And proposing interventions according to the NIC classification. The ESS diagnosis was assigned to 25% of the sample, while the SDS was assigned to 16.5%. For the ESS, 28 related factors were found, 13 population groups at risk and 5 associated conditions. For the SDS, 36 related factors, 8 risk population groups and 5 associated conditions were found. In addition, 23 possible interventions for ESS and 21 for SDS were identified. The main conclusion is the need to incorporate both diagnostic proposals into the NANDA-I classification in an area of such a complex assessment and approach as the psychosocial one. It is expected that new studies will corroborate our findings and allow, along the same line, to improve the level of evidence of the international classification of nursing diagnoses.

Bibliographic References

  • NANDA International. The structure and development of syndrome diagnoses [Internet]. Wisconsin: NANDA-I (US); 2015 [actualizado 15 jun 2015; citado 22 abr 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.nanda.org/nanda-i-resources/position-statement/
  • (2) NANDA International, Inc. Nursing Diagnoses. Definitions and Classification 2018-2020. 11th ed [e-book]. New York: Thieme; 2018.
  • (3) Brito Brito PR. Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección y valoración de problemas psicosociales de la clasificación de diagnósticos enfermeros NANDA-I [tesis doctoral]. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España: Universidad de La Laguna; 2011. 536 p.
  • (4) Brito Brito PR, Rodríguez Álvarez C, Sierra López A, Rodríguez Gómez JA, Aguirre Jaime A. Design and validation of a questionnaire for psychosocial nursing diagnosis in Primary Care. Enferm Clin. 2012;22(3):126-34.
  • (5) Brito Brito PR, Rodríguez Álvaro M, García Hernández AM, Hernández Pérez RS, Sicilia Sosvilla I, Aguirre Jaime A. El Cuestionario para el diagnóstico enfermero psico-social, CdePS. Qué es y cómo se utiliza. ENE Rev Enferm. 2012;6(2):11-23.
  • (6) Brito Brito PR, Aguirre Jaime A. El diagnóstico psicosocial desde una perspectiva enfermera. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2014.
  • (7) Brito Brito PR, Aguirre Jaime A. Asociaciones entre etiquetas del CdePS. En: Brito Brito PR, Aguirre Jaime A. El diagnóstico psicosocial desde una perspectiva enfermera. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2014. p. 270-310.
  • (8) ElSadr CB, Noureddine S, Kelley J. Concept analysis of loneliness with implications for nursing diagnosis. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009;20(1):25-33.
  • (9) Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, editors. Changes and Revisions [part 1]. Introduction of At-Risk Populations and Associated Conditions [chapt 3]. En: NANDA International, Inc. Nursing Diagnoses. Definitions and Classification 2018-2020. 11th ed [e-book]. New York: Thieme; 2018.
  • (10) Butcher HK, Bulechek GM, Dochterman JM, Wagner CM. Clasificación de intervenciones de Enfermería (NIC). Barcelona: Elsevier; 2018.
  • (11) Charlson ME, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245-51.
  • (12) Lobo A, Pérez Echeverría MJ, Artal J. Validity of the scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a Spanish population. Psychol Med. 1986;16(1):135-40.
  • (13) González de Rivera y Revuelta JL, Morera Fumero A. La valoración de sucesos vitales: Adaptación española de la escala de Holmes y Rahe. Psiquis. 1983;4(1):7-11.
  • (14) NANDA International. An important clarification on behalf of the NANDA-I board of directors [Internet]. Wisconsin: NANDA-I (US); 2019 [actualizado 25 feb 2019; citado 26 abr 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.nanda.org/2019/02/25/an-important-clarification-on-behalf-of-the-nanda-i-board-of-directors/
  • (15) Brito Brito PR, Aguirre Jaime A. Producción de datos para las pruebas. En: Brito Brito PR, Aguirre Jaime A. El diagnóstico psicosocial desde una perspectiva enfermera. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2014. p. 168-180.
  • (16) NANDA. Diagnósticos de Enfermería de la NANDA. Definiciones y clasificación 1992-1993. Barcelona: Mosby/Doyma; 1993. p. 10.
  • (17) Proietti R, Mapelli D, Volpe B, Bartoletti S, Sagone A, Dal Bianco L, Daliento L. Mental stress and ischemic heart disease: evolving awareness of a complex association. Future Cardiol. 2011;7(3):425-37.
  • (18) Szanto K, Gildengers A, Mulsant BH, Brown G, Alexopoulos GS, Reynolds CF. Identification of suicidal ideation and prevention of suicidal behaviour in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2002;19(1):11-24.
Data source: Dialnet