Nivel de autocuidados en pie diabético y concordancia de 3 sistemas de estratificación de riesgo en una zona básica de salud de Gran Canaria

  1. Héctor González-de la Torre
  2. M. Luana Quintana-Lorenzo
  3. Almudena Lorenzo-Navarro
  4. Juan José Suárez-Sánchez
  5. Miriam Berenguer-Pérez
  6. José Verdú-Soriano
Revue:
Enfermería clínica

ISSN: 1130-8621

Année de publication: 2020

Volumen: 30

Número: 2

Pages: 72-81

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENFCLI.2019.07.027 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Enfermería clínica

Résumé

Objective To assess the level of self-care in the population with diabetes and determine the risk of diabetic foot lesions through the use of 3stratification systems as well as to establish the degree of concordance between these systems. Method Observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study carried out in the Basic Health Area of Santa Brígida (Gran Canaria-Canary Islands-Spain) in people diagnosed with diabetes (DM Type 1/DM Type 2) (n=182). Interview, physical examination, review of clinical history and completion of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care questionnaire of the University of Malaga were carried out. The risk stratification was then calculated using 3systems (System of the National Institute for Health Care Excellence, Classification of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot and High-Risk Diabetic Foot-60-Second Tool©-2012). The Kappa index was calculated to study the concordance between systems, the relative risk of negative screening of one method against another was estimated and the exact Fisher test to establish whether there were differences. Results 30.2% of diabetics had a low level of self-care, 45.1% a medium level and 24.7% a high level. The risk levels calculated were: National Institute for Health Care Excellence Classification (Negative Risk 71.4%-Positive Risk 28.6%), International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot Classification (Negative Risk 67.0%-Positive Risk 33.0%) and High-Risk Diabetic Foot-60-Second Tool© (Negative Risk 62.6%-Positive Risk 37.4%). Conclusions All 3systems have good concordance with each other. The High-Risk Diabetic Foot-60-Second Tool© only distinguishes 2levels of risk but detects a higher percentage of people at risk. The Diabetic Foot Self-Care questionnaire of the University of Malaga may be useful in the context of Primary Care to assess the level of self-care of people with diabetes.

Références bibliographiques

  • Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Diabetes. Día Mundial de la Salud 2016: Vence a la diabetes [Internet]. Ginebra, abril del 2016
  • Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Informe mundial sobre diabetes [Internet]. Diabetes: perfiles de los países 2016-España. Ginebra, abril del 2016 [15 Oct 2018].
  • International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF). International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot & Practical Guidelines on the Management and Prevention of the Diabetic Foot 2007 [interactive version on DVD]. Edita IWGDF-Consultative Section of the IDF (International Diabetes Federation); 2007.
  • K. Van Acker, P. Léger, A. Hartemann, A. Chawla, M.K. Siddiqui Burden of diabetic foot disorders, guidelines for management and disparities in implementation in Europe: A systematic literature review Diabetes Metab Res Rev., 30 (2014), pp. 635-645
  • Dirección General de Programas Asistenciales. Consejería de Sanidad. Servicio Canario de Salud. Guía de actuación Pie diabético en Canarias. 2017.
  • J. Aragón-Sánchez, A. García-Rojas, J.L. Lázaro-Martínez, Y. Quintana-Marrero, M. Maynar-Moliner, M. Rabellino, et al. Epidemiology of diabetes-related lower extremity amputations in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands (Spain) Diabetes Res Clin Pract., 86 (2009), pp. e6-e8
  • M. Monteiro-Soares, E.J. Boyko, J. Ribeiro, I. Ribeiro, M. Dinis-Ribeiro Risk stratification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review Diabetologia., 54 (2011), pp. 1190-1199
  • American Diabetes Association. 9. Microvascular complications and foot care Diabetes Care. (Suppl 1) (2016), pp. S72-S80
  • M. Alonso-Fernández, J.J. Mediavilla-Bravo, F. López-Simarro, J.M. Comas-Samper, F. Carramiñana-Barrera, J. Mancera-Romero, et al., Grupo de Trabajo de Diabetes de SEMERGEN Evaluation of diabetic foot screening in Primary Care Endocrinol Nutr., 61 (2014), pp. 311-317
  • L. Matricciani, S. Jones Who cares about foot care? Barriers and enablers of foot self-care practices among non-institutionalized older adults diagnosed with diabetes: An integrative review Diabetes Educ., 41 (2015), pp. 106-117
  • S.K. Ahmad Sharoni, H.S. Minhat, N.A. Mohd Zulkefli, A. Baharom Health education programmes to improve foot self-care practices and foot problems among older people with diabetes: a systematic review Int J Older People Nurs., 11 (2016), pp. 214-239
  • T. Bonner, M. Foster, E. Spears-Lanoix Type 2 diabetes-related foot care knowledge and foot self-care practice interventions in the United States: A systematic review of the literature Diabet Foot Ankle., 7 (2016), p. 29758
  • A.C. Elías-Viramontes, L. González-Juárez Intervención educativa de enfermería para el autocuidado de los pies a personas que viven con diabetes tipo 2 Aquichan., 18 (2018), pp. 343-354
  • E. Navarro-Flores, J.M. Morales-Asencio, J.A. Cervera-Marín, M.T. Labajos-Manzanares, G. Gijon-Nogueron Development, validation and psychometric analysis of the diabetic foot self-care questionnaire of the University of Malaga, Spain (DFSQ-UMA) J Tissue Viability., 24 (2015), pp. 24-34
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Diabetic foot problems: Prevention and management. NICE guideline NG19. 2015.
  • L.A. Lavery, E.J. Peters, J.R. Williams, D.P. Murdoch, A. Hudson, D.C. Lavery International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot Reevaluating the way we classify the diabetic foot: Restructuring the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot Diabetes Care., 31 (2008), pp. 154-156
  • R.G. Sibbald, E.A. Ayello, A. Alavi, B. Ostrow, J. Lowe, M. Botros, et al. Screening for the high-risk diabetic foot: A 60-second tool (2012) Adv Skin Wound Care., 25 (2012), pp. 465-476 [quiz 477-8]
  • G. Leese, C. Schofield, B. McMurray, G. Libby, J. Golden, R. MacAlpine, et al. Scottish foot ulcer risk score predicts foot ulcer healing in a regional specialist foot clinic Diabetes Care., 30 (2007), pp. 2064-2069
  • H. González de la Torre, E. Perdomo, M.L. Quintana, A. Mosquera Estratificación de riesgo en pie diabético Gerokomos., 21 (2010), pp. 172-182
  • M. Scollan-Koliopoulos, E.A. Walker, D. Bleich Perceived risk of amputation, emotions, and foot self-care among adults with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Educ., 36 (2010), pp. 473-482
  • F. Martínez Vélez Estudio sobre el estado de los pies de los diabéticos en Atención Primaria Rev Esp Pod., XV (2004), pp. 6-12
  • J. Marinel lo Roura, J., coordinadores Verdú Soriano Conferencia nacional de consenso sobre las úlceras de la extremidad inferior (C.O.N.U.E.I.). Documento de consenso 2018. (2.ª ed.), Ergon, Madrid (2018)
  • S.A. Bus, J.J. van Netten, L.A. Lavery, M. Monteiro-Soares, A. Rasmussen, Y. Jubiz, et al., International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot IWGDF guidance on the prevention of foot ulcers in at-risk patients with diabetes Diabetes Metab Res Rev., 32 (Suppl 1) (2016), pp. 16-24
La source de données: Dialnet