Adaptación transcultural al contexto español y evaluación de la validez de contenido del cuestionario Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST-E)

  1. Irene Santana Domínguez 1
  2. Héctor González de la Torre 1
  3. Alicia Martín Martínez 1
  1. 1 Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria. Servicio Canario de Salud, Las Palmas, España
Journal:
Enfermería clínica

ISSN: 1130-8621

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 31

Issue: 6

Pages: 334-343

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.12.042 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Abstract

Objectives To carry out a cross-cultural adaptation of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) questionnaire to the Spanish context, and to evaluate its content validity (CVI). Methods The translation and cultural adaptation of a measuring instrument by means of translation and back translation conducted through the participation of 20 health professionals. The content validation was carried out through the participation of 10 experts. The content validity of each item (CVI-I), the content validity index per expert (CVI-E) and the content validity total (CVI-T) were calculated for the questionnaire. Corrections were carried out for probable random agreement and the statistical calculation Kappa (K*) modified for each item of the instrument. Results The final instrument obtained (SVEST-E) has a CVI-Total of 0.87 and consists of 36 total items, subdivided into 7 dimensions, 2 outcome variables and a support option section maintaining the same structure as the original questionnaire. Thirty items had a CVI-I with values over ≥̊0.79. Conclusions The SVEST-E questionnaire is an equivalent of the original and is an instrument that could help to evaluate the second victim experiences of healthcare professionals in our country. It is an instrument with adequate content validity to measure the experience of second victims in health professionals in our country.

Bibliographic References

  • M.H.A. Lawati, S. Dennis, S.D. Short, N.N. Abdulhadi Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review BMC Fam Pract., 19 (2018), p. 104
  • J. Arimany-Manso, C. Martin-Fumadó The importance of patient safety Med Clin (Barc)., 148 (2017), pp. 405-407
  • L.T. Kohn, J.M. Corrigan, M.S. Donaldson To err is human: building a safer health system National Academies Press (US), Washington DC (2000)
  • J. Boulanger, C. Keohane, A. Yeats Role of patient safety organizations in improving patient safety Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am., 46 (2019), pp. 257-267
  • J.T. James A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care J Patient Saf., 9 (2013), pp. 122-128
  • J.M. Aranaz-Andrés, C. Aibar, R. Limón, J.J. Mira, J. Vitaller, Y. Agra, et al. A study of the prevalence of adverse events in primary healthcare in Spain Eur J Public Health., 22 (2012), pp. 921-925, 10.1093/eurpub/ckr168 View PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar 7 J.M. Aranaz-Andrés, C. Aibar-Remón, J. Vitaller-Murillo, P. Ruiz-López, R. Limón-Ramírez, E. Terol-García, et al. Incidence of adverse events related to health care in Spain: results of the Spanish National Study of Adverse Events J Epidemiol Community Health., 62 (2008), pp. 1022-1029
  • E.C. Haukland, K. Mevik, C. von Plessen, C. Nieder, B. Vonen Contribution of adverse events to death of hospitalised patients BMJ Open Qual., 8 (2019), p. e000377
  • G.A. Assiri, N.A. Shebl, M.A. Mahmoud, N. Aloudah, E. Grant, H. Aljadhey, et al. What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature BMJ Open., 9 (2019), p. e019101
  • J. Elizabeth Marran Supporting staff who are second victims after adverse healthcare events Nurs Manag (Harrow)., 26 (2019), pp. 36-43
  • C. Rinaldi, F. Leigheb, K. Vanhaecht, C. Donnarumma, M. Panella Becoming a «second victim» in health care: pathway of recovery after adverse event Rev Calid Asist., 31 (2016), pp. 11-19
  • A.W. Wu Medical error: the second victim West J Med., 172 (2000), pp. 358-359
  • B. Coughlan, D. Powell, M.F. Higgins The second victim: a review Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol., 213 (2017), pp. 11-16
  • S.T. Chan, P.C.B. Khong, W. Wang Psychological responses, coping and supporting needs of healthcare professionals as second victims Int Nurs Rev., 64 (2017), pp. 242-262
  • J.D. Burlison, S.D. Scott, E.K. Browne, S.G. Thompson, J.M. Hoffman The second victim experience and support tool: validation of an organizational resource for assessing second victim effects and the quality of support resources J Patient Saf., 13 (2017), pp. 93-102
  • M.V. Brunelli, S. Estrada, C. Celano Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of a Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) J Patient Saf. (2018)
  • E.M. Kim, S.A. Kim, J.R. Lee, J.D. Burlison, E.G. Oh Psychometric properties of Korean version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (K-SVEST) J Patient Saf., 16 (2020), pp. 179-18618
  • J. Chen, Q. Yang, Q. Zhao, S. Zheng, M. Xiao Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (C-SVEST) J Nurs Manag., 27 (2019), pp. 1416-1422
  • A.M. Winning, J. Merandi, J.R. Rausch, N. Liao, J.M. Hoffman, J.D. Burlison, et al. Validation of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised in the neonatal intensive care unit J Patient Saf. (2020)
  • V.D. Sousa, W. Rojjanasrirat Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline J Eval Clin Pract., 17 (2011), pp. 268-274
  • J.A. López-Rodríguez Declaración de la iniciativa CHERRIES: adaptación al castellano de directrices para la comunicación de resultados de cuestionarios y encuestas online Aten Primaria., 51 (2019), pp. 586-589
  • D.F. Polit, C.T. Beck The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and Recommendations Res Nurs Health., 29 (2006), pp. 489-497
  • D.F. Polit, C.T. Beck, S.V. Owen Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations Res Nurs Health., 30 (2007), pp. 459-467 W.Q. Mok, G.F. Chin, S.F. Yap, W. Wang A cross-sectional survey on nurses’ second victim experience and quality of support resources in Singapore J Nurs Manag., 28 (2020), pp. 286-293
  • M.Á.E. Bravo Transcultural adaptation of health-related measurement instruments Enferm Clin., 14 (2004), pp. 102-106
  • J.W. Beckstead Content validity is naught Int J Nurs Stud., 46 (2009), pp. 1274-1283
  • L.R. McDaniel, C. Morris The Second Victim Phenomenon: how are midwives affected? J Midwifery Womens Health., 65 (2020), pp. 503-511
  • C.M. Pettker Systematic approaches to adverse events in obstetrics, Part I: Event identification and classification Semin Perinatol., 41 (2017), pp. 151-155
  • C.M. Pettker Systematic approaches to adverse events in obstetrics, Part II: Event analysis and response Semin Perinatol., 41 (2017), pp. 156-160
  • I. Carrillo, L. Ferrús, C. Silvestre, P. Pérez-Pérez, M.L. Torijano, F. Iglesias-Alonso, et al. Propuestas para el estudio del fenómeno de las segundas víctimas en España en atención primaria y hospitales Rev Calid Asist., 31 (2016), pp. 3-10
  • J.J. Mira, S. Lorenzo, I. Carrillo, L. Ferrús, P. Pérez-Pérez, F. Iglesias, et al. Interventions in health organisations to reduce the impact of adverse events in second and third victims BMC Health Serv Res., 22 (2015), p. 341
  • J.J. Mira, S. Lorenzo, I. Carrillo, L. Ferrús, C. Silvestre, P. Astier, et al. Lessons learned for reducing the negative impact of adverse events on patients, health professionals and healthcare organizations Int J Qual Health Care., 29 (2017), pp. 450-460