Web-based Training Program for Writing InstructionnPreservice Teachers’ Beliefs Profiles and Their Satisfaction

  1. Rocío C. Seoane 1
  2. Juan Eugenio Jiménez González 1
  3. Nuria Gutiérrez Sosa 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 33

Issue: 4

Pages: 571-578

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2021.19 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Abstract

Background: Preservice teachers’ satisfaction with online training should be considered to guarantee a successful e-learning experience. This study aims to determine whether preservice teachers’ belief profi les infl uence their satisfaction with web-based training for teaching writing. Method: To achieve this purpose, two main analyses were conducted: (1) validation of a satisfaction’s scale through Confi rmatory Factor Analysis, and (2) MANOVA with independent inter-subject variables group belief profi les (i.e., Eclectic Profi le, Socio-cultural Profi le, and Person-environment Profi le) and as dependent variables the fi ve dimensions of the satisfaction scale. Results: Results showed high satisfaction ratings with the webbased training in all the groups. Nevertheless, signifi cant differences in satisfaction ratings were found between belief profi les. Conclusions: Finally, educational implications for preservice teachers’ development are highlighted in the discussion

Bibliographic References

  • Alkhattabi, M. (2016). Empirical investigation into motives for choosing web-based distance learning programs. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 14(3), 76-90. http://dx.doi. org/10.4018/IJDET.2016070105
  • Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2017). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unifi ed perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003-2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088
  • Bağci, H. (2018). Investigation of the satisfaction levels of teacher candidates towards e-courses. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3), 65-72. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184207
  • Bazerman, C., Applebee, A. N., Berninger, V. W., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Matsuda, P., Murphy, S., Rowe, D., & Schleppegrell, M. (2017). Taking the long view on writing development. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(3), 351-360. https://bazerman.education.ucsb.edu/sites/ default/fi les/docs/Bazerman2017ARTTakingthe%20longviewRTE.pdf
  • Berninger, V. W. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections with language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 65-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363- 200020040-00007
  • Berninger, V.W., & Graham, S. (1998). Language by hand: A synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting. Handwriting Review, 12, 11-25.
  • Berninger, V.W., & Winn W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96-114). The Guilford Press.
  • Brenner, D., & McQuirk, A. (2019). A snapshot of writing in elementary teacher preparation programs. New Educator, 15(1), 18-29. https://doi. org/10.1080/1547688X.2018.1427291
  • Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080 /07421222.2003.11045748
  • Dunst, C. J., Hamby, D. W., Howse, R. B., Wilkie, H., & Annas, K. (2019). Metasynthesis of pre-service professional preparation and teacher education research studies. Education Sciences, 9(1), 50. https://doi. org/10.3390/educsci9010050
  • Dyment, J. E., & Downing, J. J. (2020). Online initial teacher education: A systematic review of the literature. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 316-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019. 1631254
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología [Factor analysis as a technique in psychological research]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33. https:// www.redalyc.org/pdf/778/77812441003.pdf
  • Ferry, B., & Kervin, L. (2011). Using online simulation to engage users in an authentic learning environment. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Gaming and Simulations: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications (pp. 1460-1476). IGI Global.
  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C., & Fink, B. (2002). Primary grade teachers’ theoretical orientations concerning writing instruction: Construct validation and a nationwide survey. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1006/ ceps.2001.1085
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 37-41. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers and Education, 95, 270- 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
  • Jiménez, J. E., & Gil, V. (2019). IPAE: Indicadores de Progreso de Aprendizaje en Escritura [Indicadors of basic early writing skills] [Suplemental material]. In Juan E. Jiménez (Ed.), Modelo de respuesta a la intervención. Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades de aprendizaje. Pirámide.
  • Jiménez, J. E., O’Shanahan, I., González, J. Á., Frugone, M., & Barrientos, P. (2014). Valoración de estudiantes universitarios y maestros del programa tutorial Letra: una experiencia piloto en países del espacio Iberoamericano [Assessment of university students and teachers of the Letra’s tutorial program: A pilot experience in Latin American countries]. Estudios de Psicología, 35(3), 605-624. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02109395.2014.974423
  • Jimenez, J. E., Seoane, R. C., García, E., & de León, S. C. (2021). Effects of web-based training on Spanish pre-service and in-service teacher knowledge and implicit beliefs on learning to write. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcal.12479
  • Jiménez, J. E., Seoane, R. C., Rodríguez, C., González, D., Suárez, N., O’Shanahan, I., ... Gutiérrez, N. (2020). Plataforma Web Trazo: programa tutorial para la formación docente en el Modelo de Respuesta a la Intervención (RtI) en escritura [Web-based Trazo: A tutorial program for professional development in a RtI model for writing].
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guildford Press. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015- 0619-7
  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936-949. http://doi.org/10.3758/ s13428-015-0619-7
  • Lunn, J., Walker, S., & Mascadri, J. (2015). Personal epistemologies and teaching. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 319-335). Routledge.
  • McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3
  • Oliveira, C., Lopes, J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (2019). Teachers’ academic training for literacy instruction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(03), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576627
  • Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.004
  • Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  • Parahoo, S. K., Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Harvey, H. L. (2016). Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(1), 1-19. https://doi.org /10.1080/08841241.2015.1083511
  • Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 7. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
  • Reichert, F., & Torney-Purta, J. (2019). A cross-national comparison of teachers’ beliefs about the aims of civic education in 12 countries: A person-centered analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 112- 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.005
  • Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. D. Raths & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 1-22). Information Age.
  • Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 640-663. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000237
  • Ritchey, K. D., Coker, D. L., & Jackson, A. F. (2015). The relationship between early elementary teachers’ instructional practices and theoretical orientations and students’ growth in writing. Reading and Writing, 28(9), 1333-1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9573-0
  • Rodrigo, M., Rodríguez, A., & Marrero, J. (1993). Las teorías implícitas: una aproximación al conocimiento cotidiano [Implicit theories: An approach to daily knowledge]. Alianza Editorial.
  • RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R (Version 1.2.5019) [Computer software]. http://www.rstudio.com/
  • Seoane, R. C., Jiménez, J. E., & Gutiérrez, N. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ implicit theories of learning to write. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.16 81964
  • Seoane, R.C., Jiménez, J.E., & Gutiérrez, N. (2021). Identifying preservice teacher’s belief profiles and their performance in a web-based training program for writing instruction [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, Universidad de La Laguna.
  • Shand, K., & Farrelly, S. G. (2018). The art of blending: Benefits and challenges of a blended course for pre-service teachers. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.10
  • Thurm, D. (2018). Teacher beliefs and practice when teaching with technology: A latent profile analysis. In L. Ball, P. Drijvers, S. Ladel, H. Siller, M. Tabach & C. Vale (Eds.), Uses of technology in primary and secondary mathematics education (pp. 409-419). Springer.
  • Tracey, D. H., & L. Mandel (2012). Lenses on Reading: An Introduction to Theories and Models. Guilford Press.
  • Troia, G. A. (2019). Writing standards: Overcoming the implementation challenges. State Education Standard, 19(2), 24-28. http://www.nasbe. org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Troia_May-2019-Standard.pdf