Análisis del contexto institucional para el emprendimientozonas continentales versus zonas periféricas

  1. Arbelo-Pérez, Sara 1
  2. Ruiz-Rosa, Inés 1
  3. Gutiérrez-Taño, Desiderio 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info
    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad de La Laguna
Journal:
Emprendimiento y negocios internacionales

ISSN: 2530-5603

Year of publication: 2024

Volume: 9

Issue: 2

Pages: 35-39

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Emprendimiento y negocios internacionales

Abstract

  The promotion of entrepreneurial activity is crucial for economic and social development, especially in peripheral regions where business creation can overcome obstacles and stimulate progress. This study analyzes differences in the perception of institutional factors in peripheral and central entrepreneurial ecosystems through a T-Student test applied to 1,007 experts from the 2019 National Expert Survey of the GEM in Spain. The results indicate that the characteristics of peripheral areas significantly influence entrepreneurial spirit, guiding strategies to promote entrepreneurship in these areas.

Bibliographic References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2009). The global entrepreneurship index (GEINDEX). Vol. 24. Now Publishers Inc.
  • Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2002). An institutional perspective on the role of culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 53-68.
  • Ahmad N., & Hoffmann A. (2008). A framework for addressing and measuring entrepreneurship. OECD Statistics Working Paper Series.
  • Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051.
  • Felzensztein, C., Gimmon, E., & Aqueveque, C. (2013). Entrepreneurship at the Periphery: Exploring Framework Conditions in Core and Peripheral Locations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 37(4), 815-835. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00515.
  • Fortunato, M. W., & Alter, T. R. (2011). The individual-institutional-opportunity nexus: An integrated framework for analyzing entrepreneurship development. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(1).
  • Freitas, C., & Kitson, M. (2018). Perceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems in remote islands and core regions. Island Studies Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.44
  • Haro, S. G., & Gómez, R. S. (2011). Influencia del entorno institucional en el desarrollo del emprendimiento español. Un análisis empírico. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 16(54), 191-208.
  • Kansheba, J. M. P., & Wald, A. E. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(6), 943-964.
  • Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 37, 1492-1503.
  • Steyaert, C., & Hjorth, D. (Eds.). (2008). Entrepreneurship as social change: A third new movements in entrepreneurship book. Vol. 3. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Van Stel, A., & Suddle, K. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 31-47.
Data source: Dialnet