Measuring perceived exercise capability and investigating its relationship with childhood obesity: A feasibility study

  1. Taylor, M.J. 23
  2. Arriscado, D. 1
  3. Vlaev, I. 3
  4. Taylor, D. 3
  5. Gately, P. 4
  6. Darzi, A. 3
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  2. 2 University of Nottingham
    info

    University of Nottingham

    Nottingham, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/01ee9ar58

  3. 3 Imperial College London
    info

    Imperial College London

    Londres, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/041kmwe10

  4. 4 Leeds Beckett University
    info

    Leeds Beckett University

    Leeds, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/02xsh5r57

Revista:
International Journal of Obesity

ISSN: 0307-0565

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 40

Número: 1

Páginas: 34-38

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1038/IJO.2015.210 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-84953353161 WoS: WOS:000367628700006 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Obesity

Resumen

Background/Objectives:According to the COM-B ('Capability', 'Opportunity', 'Motivation' and 'Behaviour') model of behaviour, three factors are essential for behaviour to occur: capability, opportunity and motivation. Obese children are less likely to feel capable of exercising. The implementation of a new methodological approach to investigate the relationship between perceived exercise capability (PEC) and childhood obesity was conducted, which involved creating a new instrument, and demonstrating how it can be used to measure obesity intervention outcomes.Subjects/Methods:A questionnaire aiming to measure perceived exercise capability, opportunity and motivation was systematically constructed using the COM-B model and administered to 71 obese children (aged 9-17 years (12.24±0.2.01), body mass index (BMI) standard deviation scores (SDS) 2.80±0.660) at a weight-management camp in northern England. Scale validity and reliability was assessed. Relationships between PEC, as measured by the questionnaire, and BMI SDS were investigated for the children at the weight-management camp, and for 45 Spanish schoolchildren (aged 9-13 years, (10.52±1.23), BMI SDS 0.80±0.99). A pilot study, demonstrating how the questionnaire can be used to measure the effectiveness of an intervention aiming to bring about improved PEC for weight-management camp attendees, was conducted. No participants withdrew from these studies.Results:The questionnaire domain (exercise capability, opportunity and motivation) composite scales were found to have adequate internal consistency (a=0.712-0.796) and construct validity (χ 2/degrees of freedom=1.55, root mean square error of approximation=0.072, comparative fit index=0.92). Linear regression revealed that low PEC was associated with higher baseline BMI SDS for both UK (b=-0.289, P=0.010) and Spanish (b=-0.446, P=0.047) participants. Pilot study findings provide preliminary evidence for PEC improvements through intervention being achievable, and measurable using the questionnaire.Conclusions:Evidence is presented for reliability and validity of the questionnaire, and for feasibility of its use in the context of a childhood obesity intervention. Future research could investigate the link between PEC and childhood obesity further. © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.