A motivational model for environmentally responsible behavior

  1. Tabernero Urbieta, María del Carmen 1
  2. Hernández Ruiz, Bernardo 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Córdoba
    info

    Universidad de Córdoba

    Córdoba, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05yc77b46

  2. 2 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 15

Número: 2

Páginas: 648-658

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/REV_SJOP.2012.V15.N2.38876 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

Este artículo analiza si autoeficacia y motivación intrínseca están relacionadas con el comportamiento ecológico responsable. El estudio analiza la relación del comportamiento proambiental en el pasado, los mecanismos de autorregulación (autoeficacia, satisfacción, metas) y la motivación intrínseca y extrínseca con el comportamiento ecológico responsable actual, en una muestra de 156 estudiantes universitarios. Los resultados muestran que todas las variables motivacionales estudiadas están vinculadas con el comportamiento ecológico responsable. Los efectos de la autoeficacia en el comportamiento ecológico responsable están mediados por las respuestas de motivación intrínseca de los participantes. Se confirmó mediante análisis de vías un modelo teórico, que puso de manifiesto la potencia de las variables motivacionales para poder predecir el comportamiento ecológico responsable. Mediante un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales se probó el ajuste el modelo. Se discute el papel de variables motivacionales a la hora de crear contextos de aprendizaje adecuados y nuevas experiencias, en los que la autoeficacia y las reacciones afectivas tienen gran importancia.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This paper was based on two research projects supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología under Grants PSI2009-07423 and PSI2009-08896 in which Carmen Tabernero and Bernardo Hernández are the main researchers, respectively.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahn, S. J., & Bailenson, J. (2011). Embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments: Effects on pro-environmental self-efficacy and behavior (Technical Report) Standford University, Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved from http://vhil.stanford.edu/pubs/2011/VHIL-technical-report.pdf
  • Aragonés, J. I., Sevillano, V., Cortés, B., & Amérigo, M. (2006). Cuestiones ambientales que se perciben como problemas [The perception of environmental issues as problems]. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 72, 1-19.
  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologists, 37, 122-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.37.2.122
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2002). Environmental sustainability by sociocognitive deceleration of population growth. In P. Schmuch & W. Schultz (Eds.), The psychology of sustainable development (pp. 209-238). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Bandura, A. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 54, 245-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00208.x
  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
  • Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D'Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic motivation and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750
  • Caprara, G. V., & Bonino, S. (2006). Il comportamento prosociale [Prosocial Behavior]. Trento, Italia: Edizioni Erickson.
  • Caprara, G. V., & Steca, P. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 218-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.218
  • Combs, G. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Diversity training: Analysis of the impact of self-efficacy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 91-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1193
  • Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 29, 473-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00094.x
  • Corral-Verdugo, V., & Frías, M. (2006). Personal normative beliefs, antisocial behavior, and residential water conservation. Environment and Behavior, 38, 406-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916505282272
  • Darner, R. (2009). Self-determination theory as a guide to fostering environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.2.39-49
  • De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00181
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203-1218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009
  • Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Corben, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255001
  • Earley, P. C., & Lituchy, T. R. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects. A test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 81-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.76.1.81
  • Eden, D., & Aviram, A. (1993). Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people to help themselves. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 352-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.3.352
  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 139-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009057102306
  • Feltz, D. L., Short, S., & Sullivan, P. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Garcia, J. N., & Fidalgo, R. (2008). Writing self-efficacy changes after cognitive strategy intervention is students with learning disabilities: The mediational role of gender in calibration. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 414-432.
  • Geller, E. S. (2002). The challenge of increasing pro-environment behavior. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
  • Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 590-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973142
  • Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107
  • Kalinowski, C. M., Lynne, G. D., & Johnson, B. (2006). Recycling as a reflection of balanced self-interest. A test of metaeconomic approach. Environment and Behavior, 38, 333-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916505279043
  • Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A self-regulatory skills perspective to reducing cognitive interference. In I. G. Sarason, B. R. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Cognitive interference: Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 153-171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223006
  • Levitt, L., & Leventhal, G. (1986). Litter reduction: How effective is the New York State Bottle Bill? Environment and Behavior, 18, 467-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916586184003
  • Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacyperformance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258790
  • Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Performance, 3, 157-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year Odyssey. American Psychologists, 57, 705-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705
  • Martín-Albó, J., Núñez, J. L., & Navarro, J. G. (2009). Validation of a Spanish version of the situational motivation scale (EMSI) in the educational context. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 799-807.
  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.229
  • Moreno, J. A., González-Cutre, D., & Chillón, M. (2009). Preliminary validation in Spanish of a scale designed to measure motivation in physical education classes: The Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) Scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 327-337.
  • Oceja, L., & Berenguer, J. (2009). Putting text in context: The conflict between pro-ecological messages and anti-ecological descriptive norms. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 657-666.
  • Osbaldiston, R., & Sheldon, K. M. (2003). Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior. A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 349-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00035-5
  • Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Pelletier, L. G., & Sharp, E. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviors: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviors through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology, 3, 210-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012755
  • Ramus, C. A., & Killmer, A. B. C. (2007). Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviors - A conceptual framework for employee motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 554-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.504
  • Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being: It's not the money, it's the motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 959-971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.959
  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and workrelated performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.240
  • Syme, G. J., Nancarrow, B. E., & Seligman, C. (2000). The evaluation of information campaigns to promote voluntary household water conservation. Evaluation Review, 24, 539-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X0002400601
  • Tabernero, C., & Wood, R. E. (1999). Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in regulation and performance on a complex task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 104-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2829
  • TNS (2005). European Commission. The attitudes of European citizens towards environment. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_217_en.pdf
  • Vancouver, J. B., Moore, K. M., & Yoder, R. J. (2008). Selfefficacy and resource allocation: Support for a nonmonotonic, discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 35- 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.35
  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, E. C., & Putka, D. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of selfefficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 506-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.506
  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.605
  • Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.3.407
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2003). Educational Psychology: A Century of Contributions. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet