Priming morfológicoalgo más que "priming" morfológico

  1. Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni
  2. Perea Lara, Manuel
  3. Gutiérrez, Eva María
  4. Mena, Yaiza
  5. Carreiras Valiña, Manuel Francisco
Revista:
Anuario de psicología

ISSN: 0066-5126

Any de publicació: 2007

Volum: 38

Número: 1

Pàgines: 9-24

Tipus: Article

Altres publicacions en: Anuario de psicología

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Allen, M. & Badecker, W. (1999). Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multiple-level lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 105-123.
  • Barber, H., Domínguez, A. & de Vega, M. (2002). Human brain potentials indicate morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 318, 149-152.
  • Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J.A. & Perea, M. (en preparación). Effects of transparency on morphological decomposition may depend on language.
  • Carreiras, M., Perdomo, A. & Meseguer, E. (2005). Are stem homographs and orthographic neighbors processed differently during silent reading? Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 317-339.
  • Christianson, K., Johnson, R.L. & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
  • Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J.T. & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. En Dornic, S. (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Davis, C.J. & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671.
  • Domínguez, A., de Vega, M. & Barber, H. (2004). Event Related Potentials elicited by morphological, homographic and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16:4, 598-608.
  • Domínguez, A., Seguí, J. & Cuetos, F. (2002). The time course of inflectional morphological priming. Linguistics, 40, 235-259.
  • Drews, E. & Zwitserlood, P.(1995). Orthographic and morphological similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21 (5), 1098-1116.
  • Duñabeitia, J.A., Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (enviado). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition.
  • Feldman, L., B. & Moskovljevic, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13 (4), 573-581.
  • Feldman, L.B. (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: Differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 442-470.
  • Feldman, L.B., Kanai, Y. & Basnight-Brown, D. (enviado). Effects of orthographic neighborhood size on morphological processing.
  • Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C. & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
  • Forster, K.I. & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
  • Forster, K.I. & Forster, J.C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35, 116-124.
  • Fowler, C.A., Napps, S.F. & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 13, 241-255.
  • Frost, R., Forster, K.I. & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew: A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23, 829-856.
  • Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A. & Forster, K.I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31, 1293-1326.
  • García-Albea, J.E., Sánchez-Casas, R.M. & Igoa, J.M. (1998). The contribution of word form and meaning to language processing in Spanish: Some evidence from monolingual and bilingual studies. En D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol.31: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 183-209). New York: Academic Press.
  • Giraudo, H. & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 96-101.
  • Giraudo, H. & Grainger, J. (2003). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. En R.H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 209-232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Grainger, J., Colé, P. & Seguí, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual Word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.
  • Hanson, V.L. & Wilkenfeld, D. (1985). Morphophonology and lexical organization in deaf readers. Language and Speech, 28, 3, 269-280.
  • Laudanna, A., Cermele, A. & Caramazza, A. (1997). Morpho-lexical representations and reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 49-66.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & Zhou, X-L (1999). Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 321-352.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & Tyler, L. K, (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 428-435.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & Tyler, L.K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592-594.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D., Tyler, L.K., Waksler, R. & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
  • Nagy, W.E. & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
  • Napps, S.E. & Fowler, C.A. (1987). Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16 (3), 257-272.
  • Perea, M. & Rosa, E. (1999). Psicología de la lectura y procesamiento léxico visual: Una revisión de técnicas experimentales y procedimientos de análisis. Psicológica, 20, 65-90.
  • Plaut, D.C. & Gonnerman, L.M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
  • Pollatsek, A., Perea, M. & Carreiras, M. (2005). Does conal prime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition, 33, 557-565.
  • Rastle, K.G., Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & Tyler, L.K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537.
  • Rastle, K.G. & Davis, M.H. (2003). Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. En S. Kinoshita & S.J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 279-305). Hove, Reino Unido: Psychology Press.
  • Rastle, K.G., Davis, M.H. & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
  • Ratcliff, R., Gómez, P. & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical-decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
  • Sánchez-Casas, R., Igoa, J.M. & García-Albea, J.E. (2003). On the representation of inflections and derivations: Data from Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (6), 621-668.
  • Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M. & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat de Barcelona.
  • Seguí, J. & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76.
  • Shoolman, N. & Andrews, S. (2003). Racehorses, reindeer and sparrows. Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification. En S. Kinoshita & S.J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, Reino Unido: Psychology Press.
  • Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289-297.
  • Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
  • Taft, M. & Forster, K.I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
  • Taft, M. & Forster, K.I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H.L.J. & Grasman, R.P.P.P. (en prensa). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.