Metodología científica y teoría general del lenguaje

  1. Cózar Escalante, José Manuel de
Revista:
Endoxa: Series Filosóficas

ISSN: 1133-5351

Año de publicación: 1995

Número: 5

Páginas: 115-124

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/ENDOXA.5.1995.4837 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_opene-spacio editor

Otras publicaciones en: Endoxa: Series Filosóficas

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BARNES, Barry, (1982), T. S. Kuhn y las ciencias sociales. F.C.E., México, 1986.
  • BAZERMAN, Charles (1988), Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  • BURKE, Kenneth (1950), A Rhetoric of Motives. California University Press, Berkeley.
  • FINOCCHIARO, Maurice A. (1977), 'Logic and Rhetoric in Lavoisier's Sealed Note: Toward A Rhetoric of Science', Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2):111-122.
  • FULLER, Steve (1993), Philosophy, Rhetoric and the End of Knowledge. The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  • GILBERT, G. Nigel y Michel MULKAY (1984), Opening Pandora's Box. A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • GÓMEZ FERRI, Javier (1994), Metodología de la economía: El enfoque pragmático. (Tesis Doctoral. Microficha). Publicaciones de la Universitat Jaume I, Castellón.
  • GÓMEZ FERRI, Javier (1995), 'La ciencia como relato. Hacia una post-metodología de la ciencia', en Vicente Sánchez Biosca y Rafael Rodríguez Tranche (eds.) (1995), La crisis del relato en la contemporaneidad. Filmoteca de Andalucía, Córdoba (en prensa).
  • GROSS, Alan G. (1990a), The Rhetoric of Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • GROSS, Alan G. (1990b), 'An English Professor Looks at the Scientific Article', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 21(2):341-349.
  • GUSFIELD, Joseph (1976), "The Literary Rhetoric of Science: Comedy and Pathos in Drinking Driver Research', American Sociological Review, 41(febrero): 16-34.
  • KLAMER, Arjo (1983), Conversations with Economists. New Classical Economists and Their Opponents Speak Out on the Current Controversy in Macroeconomics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Savage, MD.
  • KLAMER , Arjo (1987), 'As If Economists and Their Subjects Were Rational', en John S. Nelson. Alan Megill y Donald McCloskey (eds.) (1987), pp. 163-183.
  • KLAMER, Arjo; D. N. McCLOSKEY y Robert M. SOLOW (eds.) (1988), The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • KUHN, Thomas S. ([1962] 1969), La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. F.C.E., Madrid, 1982.
  • LAMO DE ESPINOSA, Emilio; José María GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA y Cristóbal TORRES ALBERO (1994), La sociología del conocimiento y de la ciencia. Alianza Editorial, Madrid.
  • LATOUR, Bruno y P. FABRI (1977), 'La Rhétorique de la Science', Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 13, 81-95.
  • MANNHEIM, Karl (1936), Ideología y utopía. Introducción a la sociología del conocimiento. F.C.E., México, 1987.
  • McCLOSKEY, Donald N. (1985), The Rhetoric of Economics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. (Existe versión castellana a cargo de Ángeles Conde, publicada por la editorial Alianza, 1990).
  • MORTARA GARAVELLI, Bice (1988). Manual de retórica. Cátedra, Madrid, 1991.
  • MUNZ, Peter (1990), 'The Rhetoric of Rhetoric,' Journal of the History of Ideas, 51(1):121-142.
  • MYERS, Greg (1990a), Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  • MYERS, Greg (1990b), 'Sociology of Science Without the Sociology', Social Studies of Science, 20:559-563.
  • MYERS, Greg (1992), 'Textbooks and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge', English for Specific Purposes, 11(1):3-17.
  • NELSON, John. S.; Alan MEGILL y Donald McCLOSKEY (eds.) (1987), The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
  • OVERINGTON, Michael A. (1977), 'The Scientific Community as Audience: Toward a Rhetorical Analysis of Science', Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2):143-164.
  • PERELMAN, Chaim (1990), 'Rhetoric', Encyclopᴂdia Britannica vol. 26, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pg.. 803-810 (15_ ed.).
  • PERELMAN, Chaim y Lucie OLBRECHTS-TYTECA (1958), Tratado de la argumentación. Gredos, Madrid, 1989.
  • PINCH, Trevor (1990), 'The Sociology of the Scientific Community', en R. C. Olby, G. N. Cantor, J. R. R Christie y J. S. Hodge (eds.) (1990), Companion to the History of Modern Science. Routledge, Londres, pg. 87-99.
  • PRELLI, Lawrence J. (1989), A Rhetoric of Science. Inventing Scientific Discourse. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC.
  • RICHARDS, I. A. (1936), The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, Londres.
  • ROUSE, Joseph (1993), 'What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge?', Configurations, l(l):l-22.
  • SIMONS. Herbert W. (ed.). (1989), Rhetoric in the Human Sciences. Sage, Londres.
  • SIMONS, Herbert W. (ed.) (1990), The Rhetorical Turn. Invention and Persuasion in the Conduct of lnquiry. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • SCHUSTER, John A. y Richard R. Yeo (eds.) (1986), The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method. Reidel, Dordrecht.
  • TOULMIN, Stephen E. (1958), The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Londres.
  • WEIMER, Walter B. (1977), 'Science as a Rhetorical Transaction: Toward a Nonjustificational Conception of Rhetoric', Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(1)Xl):1-29.