Competing for a research spacethe criticism of one's own scientific community

Références bibliographiques

• Ahmad, U. K. 1997. «Research article introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an emerging research community» in A. Duszak, ed. Culture and Styles in Academic Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 273-303.
• Belcher, D. 1995. «Writing critically across the curriculum» in D. Belcher and G. Braine, eds. Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 135-155.
• Bloch , J. and Li, L. 1995. «A comparison of the use of citations in Chínese and English academic discourse» in D. Belcher and G. Braine, eds. Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 135-155.
• Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Burgess, S. and Fagan, A. 2002. «(Kid) gloves on or off?: Academic conflict in research articles across the disciplines». Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 44 (in press).
• Cherry, R. D. 1998. «Ethos versus Persona: Self-representation in written discourse». Written Communication, 15: 384-410.
• Duszak, A. 1994. «Academic discourse and intellectual styles». Journal of Pragtnatics, 21: 291-313.
• Duszak, A. (Ed). 1997. Culture and Styles in Academic Discourse. Berlín: Montón de Gruyter.
• Gilbert, G. N. and Mukay, M. 1984. Opening Pandora's Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hunston, S. 1993. «Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse» in Baker, M., Francis, G. and E. Tognini-Bonelli, eds. Text and Technology. In Honor of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 115-133.
• Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary Discourse. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Hyland, K. 2001. «Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research árdeles». English for Specific Purposes, 20: 207-226.
• Kourilova, M. 1996. «Interactive function of language in peer reviews of medical papers written by NN users of English». UNESCO-ALSED LSP Newsletter, 19: 4-21.
• Motta-Roth, D. 1998. «Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: A study of text and disciplinary cultures» in Fortanet, I., Posteguillo, S., Palmer, J. C. and J. F. Coll, eds. Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes. Vol. 9 Filología. Universitat Jaume I: CoUecció Summa, 29-59.
• Myers, G. 1989. «The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles». Applied Linguistics, 10: 1-35.
• Salager-Meyer, F. 1998. «The rationale behind academic conflict: from outright criticism to contextual 'niche' creation». UNESCO-ALSED LSP, 21: 4-23.
• Salager-Meyer, F. 1999. «Contentiousness in written medical English discourse: A diachronic study (1810-1995)». Text, 19: 371-398.
• Salager-Meyer, F. 2001. «The bittersweet rhetoric of controversiality in 19thand 20th-century French and English medical literature». Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2: 141-173,
• Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Taylor, G. and Chen, T. 1991. «Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts». Applied Linguistics, 12/3: 319-336.