El problema de la emergencia de normas sociales en la acción colectivauna aproximación analítica

Referencias bibliográficas

• Axelrod, R. (1986a), La Evolución de la Cooperación, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.
• Axelrod, R. (1986b), “An evolutionary approach to norms”, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, pp. 1095- 1111. doi:10.2307/1960858
• Coleman, J. S. (1991), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
• Chong, D. (1990), Collective Action and the Civil Rights movement, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• Dixon, M. y V. J. Rosigno (2003), “Status, networks and social movement participation: the case of striking workers”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 108, pp. 1292-1327. doi:10.1086/375198
• Flache, A. y M. Macy (1996), “The weakness of strong ties: collective action failure in a highly cohesive group”, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 21, no 1-2, pp. 3-28.
• Fehr, E. y Gachter (2000), “Cooperation and punishment in public good experiment”, American Economic Review, vol. 90, no 4, pp. 980-994.
• Hardin, R. (1971), “Collective action as an agreeable n-Prisoners’ Dilemmas”, Behavioural Science, vol. 16, pp. 472-481. doi:10.1002/bs.3830160507
• Hardin, R. (1984), “When actors comply: monitoring costs and the production of social order”, Acta Sociologica, 27 (3), pp. 161-183. doi:10.1177/000169938402700301
• Hechter, M. (1987), Principles of Group Solidarity, Londres, University of California Press.
• Heckathorn, D. (1989), “Collective action and the second order free-rider problem”, Rationality and Society, vol. 1, pp. 78-100. doi:10.1177/1043463189001001006
• Heckathorn, D. (1996), “The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action”, American Sociological Review, vol. 61, pp. 250-277. doi:10.2307/2096334
• Homans, G. C. (1974), Social Behavior. Its Elementary Forms, Nueva York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
• Horne (2001), “Sociological perspectives on the emergence of social norms”, en M. Hecheter y K. D. Opp, (Eds.) Social Norms, Nueva York, Russell Sage Foundation.
• Horne, C. (2004), “Collective benefits, exchange interests and norm enforcement”, Social Forces, vol. 82, pp. 1037-1062. doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0041
• Horne, C. y A. Cutlip (2002), “Sanctioning costs and norm enforcement”, Rationality and Society, vol. 14, pp. 285-307. doi:10.1177/1043463102014003002
• Karklin, R. y R. Petersen (1993), “Decision calculus of protest and regimes: Eastern Europe 1989”, The Journal of Politics, vol. 55, pp. 588–614. doi:10.2307/2131990
• Linares Martinez, F. (2002), “Eleccion racional y normas sociales: una vuelta mas de turca”, Revista Internacional de Sociología, 32, pp. 77–99.
• Linares Martinez, F. (2004), “Hawks, zealots and hypocrites but not free riders: The logics of cooperation in Llano del Beal”, Rationality and Society, 16 (4), 437-476. doi:10.1177/1043463104044683
• Marwell, G. y P. Oliver (1993), The Critical Mass in Collective Action. A Micro-Social Theory, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.
• Macy, M. (1993), “Backward looking social control”, American Sociological Review, vol. 68, pp. 819 –836. doi:10.2307/2095953
• Oberschall, A. (1980), “Loosely structured collective conflict: A theory and an application”, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 13, pp. 45-68.
• Oberschall, A. (1994), “Rational choice in collective protest”, Rationality and Society, vol. 6, no1, pp. 79-100. doi:10.1177/1043463194006001006
• Oliver, P. (1980), “Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 85, pp. 1356-1375. doi:10.1086/227168
• Oliver, P., G. Marwell y R. Teixeira (1985), “A theory of critical mass I. Group heterogeneity, interdependence and the production of collective goods”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, pp. 522-556. doi:10.1086/228313
• Oliver, P. y G. Marwell (1988), “The paradox of group size in collective action: towards a theory of critical mass. II.” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, pp. 522-556. doi:10.1086/228313
• Olson, M. 1971 [1965], The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
• Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press
• Sandler, T. (1992), Collective Action: Theory and Applications, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
• Taylor, M. (1982), Community, Anarchy and Liberty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Taylor, M. (1987), The Possibility of Cooperation, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press.
• Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977), The Emergence of Norms, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
• Voss, T. (2001), “Game-theoretical perspectives on the emergence of social norms” en M. Hecheter y K. D. Opp (Eds.), Social Norms, Nueva York, Russell Sage Foundation.
• Ward, H. (1989), “Testing the Waters: Taking risks to gain reassurance in public good games”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 33, no 2, pp. 274-308. doi:10.1177/0022002789033002005
• White, J. W. (1988), “Rational Rioters: leaders, followers and popular protest in early modern Japan”, Politics and Society, vol. 16, no 1, pp. 1-34. doi:10.1177/003232928801600102
• Yamagishi, T. (1986), “The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 5 (1), pp. 110-116. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110
• Yamagishi, T. (1988), “Seriousness of social dilemmas and the provision of a sanctioning system”, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 51, no 1, pp. 32-42. doi:10.2307/2786982
• Yamagishi, T. y N. Takahashi (1994), “Evolution of norms without metanorms” en U. Schulz, W. Albers and U. Muller (Eds.), Social Dilemmas and Cooperation, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.