Revisión de los métodos filogenéticos de secuenciasuna crítica a la teoría de Kimura sobre el neutralismo de la evolución molecular

  1. Meléndez Hevia, Enrique
  2. Rodríguez Raposo, Raquel
  3. Meléndez Morales, Ruth
  4. Cabezas, Héctor
Revista:
Revista de la Academia Canaria de Ciencias: = Folia Canariensis Academiae Scientiarum

ISSN: 1130-4723

Any de publicació: 1997

Volum: 9

Número: 2-4

Pàgines: 65-86

Tipus: Article

Altres publicacions en: Revista de la Academia Canaria de Ciencias: = Folia Canariensis Academiae Scientiarum

Resum

The approaches for phylogenetic studies based on protein and nucleic acid sequence analysis have yielded a remarkable advance in our knowledge of biodiversity in the last 30 years. However its correct use has many problems, so data processing is a hard task. The general hypothesis on which all these methods are based is the so-called neutral theory of molecular evolution, presented by Kimura. In this work we present a review of these methods and of their main problems, and present a criticism to Kimura's theory, based on the results of our research in the last years. A conclusion of this work is that the correct interpretation of molecular phylogeny data demonstrates that arthropods and annelids are artificial groups with no phylogenetic consistency.