Funcionalismo, reduccionismo y sistemas cumulativos. ¿Qué tipo de teoría social analítica necesitamos?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Barabasi, A. 2003. Linked. New York: Plume. Blau, P. M. 1978. Inequality and Heterogenity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
• Blau, P. M. 1980. “A fable about social structure.” Social Forces 58 (3):777-788.
• Boudon, R. 1981. La lógica de lo social: introducción al análisis sociológico. Barcelona: Rialp
• Boudon, R. 2006. “Homo sociologicus: Neither a rational man nor an irrational idiot.” Papers 80: 149- 169.
• Camerer, C. F. 2003. Behavioral Economics: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton: Princeton Universtiy Press.
• Cohen. G. A. 1978. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: a Defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard. MA: Harvard University Press.
• Collins, R. 2009. Cadenas de rituales de interacción. Barcelona: Anthropos.
• Elster, J. 1979. Ulyses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Elster, J. 1982. “Marxism, functionalism and game theory.” Theory and Society 11: 453-482.
• Elster, J. 1983. Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Elster, J. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Flache, A. y M. Macy. 1996. “The weakness of strong ties: collective action failure in a highly cohesive group.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21 (1 – 2): 3-28.
• Gintis, H. 2000. Game Theory Evolving. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Gintis, H. 2011. “Gene-culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality.” Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B 366: 878-888.
• Goffman, E. 1970. Los rituales de la interacción. Buenos Aires: Tiempo Contemporáneo.
• Hempel, C. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press.
• Hedström, P. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hedström, P. y P. Bearman. 2009. “What is analytical sociology all about? An introductory essay.” Pp. 3-24 en The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, editado por P. Hedström y P. Bearman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hedström, P. y R. Swedberg. 1998. “Social mechanism: An introductory essay.” Pp. 1-31 en Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, editado por P. Hedström y R. Swedberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hedström, P. y L. Udehn. 2009. “Analytical sociology and theories of the middle range.” Pp 25-47 en The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, editado por P. Hedström y P. Bearman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hedström, P. y P. Ylikoski. 2010. “Causal mechanisms in the social sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49-67.
• Homans, G. C. 1964. “Bringing men back in.” American Sociological Review 29: 809-818.
• Homans, G. C. 1970. La naturaleza de la ciencia social. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria.
• Homans, G. C. 1974. Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
• Luckmann, T. 1996. Teoría de la acción social. Barcelona: Paidós. Manzo, G. 2010. “Analytical sociology and its critics.” European Journal of Sociology 51 (1): 129-170.
• Macy, M. W. 1993. “Backward looking social control.” American Sociological Review 68: 819-836.
• Macy, M. W. y A. Flache. 2009. “Social dynamics from the bottom up: Agent-based models of social interaction.” pp. 245-268 en The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, editado por P. Hedström y P. Bearman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Merton, R. K. 1936. “The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action.” American Sociological Review 1: 894-904.
• Merton, R. K. 1949. “Discussion.” American Sociological Review 13: 64-68
• Merton, R. K.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
• Merton, R. K. 1992a. “La profecía que se cumple a sí misma.” Pp. 505-520 en Teoría y Estructura Sociales. Mexico D. F: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• Merton, R. K. 1992b. “Funciones manifiestas y latentes”. Pp. 92-160 en Teoría y Estructura Sociales. Mexico D. F: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• Merton, R. K. 1992c. “Sobre las teorías sociológicas de alcance intermedio.” Pp. 56-91 en Teoría y Estructura Sociales. Mexico D. F: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• Nagel, E. 1981. “A formalization of functionalism”, Pp. 338-372 en Emery, F. E. (ed.) Systems Thinking: 1. London: Penguin Modern Management Readings.
• Noguera, J. A. 2006. “Why we need an analytical social theory.” Papers 80: 7-28.
• Noguera, J. A.. 2009. “Which ontology for social science? Reductionism, individualism and emergence.” Conferencia presentada en Phiolosophy of Science (POS) Seminar, Universidad de Helsinki.
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
• Schelling, T. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
• Smelser, N. 1962. Collective Behavior. New York: The Free Press. Stinchcombe, A. L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
• Van Parijs, P. 1981. Evolutionary Explanations in the Social Science. Totowa NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Wilenski, U. 1998. “NetLogo Segregation model.” http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/Segregation. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
• Ylikoski, P. y J. Kuorikoski. 2008. “Intentional fundamentalism”. Pp. 405-407 en Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences. Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium Vol XVI, editado por A. Hieke y H. Leitgeb. Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein.