Syllable frequency effects in Spanish handwriting production

  1. Olivia Afonso
  2. Carlos Javier Álvarez González
Revista de logopedia, foniatría y audiología

ISSN: 0214-4603

Year of publication: 2011

Volume: 31

Issue: 1

Pages: 33-38

Type: Article

Export: RIS
DOI: 10.1016/s0214-4603(11)70169-3 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Bibliographic References

  • Álvarez, C.J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 545-555.
  • Álvarez, C.J., Cottrell, D., & Afonso, O. (2009). Writing dictated words and picture names: Syllabic boundaries affect execution in Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 205-223.
  • Barry, C., & de Bastiani, P. (1997). Lexical priming of nonword spelling in the regular orthography of Italian. Reading and Writing, 9, 499-517.
  • Barry, C., & Seymour, P.H.K. (1988). Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 5-40.
  • Bogaerts, H., Meulenbroek, R.G.J., & Thomassen, A.J.W.M. (1996). The possible role of the syllable as a processing unit in handwriting. In: M.L. Simner, C.G. Leedham & A.J.W.M. Thomassen (Eds.), Handwriting and Drawing Research: Basic and Applied Issues (pp. 115-126). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2003). The orthographic representation of consonant-vowel status: Evidence from two cases of acquired dysgraphia. Brain and Language, 87, 120-121.
  • Caramazza, A. (1988). Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired dysgraphya: The lexical system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 11, 395-421.
  • Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243-297.
  • Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59-85.
  • Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90, 393-400.
  • Cholin, J., Levelt, W.J.M., & Schiller, N.O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205-235.
  • Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A.M. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 296-326.
  • Cottrell, D. (1999). SpellWrite Version 1.6 (Computer software and manual). Available from the author:
  • Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 96, 283-321.
  • Delattre, M., Bonin, P., & Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1330-1340.
  • Folk, J.R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). Lexical/sublexical interaction in spelling: What's the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 653-671.
  • Hillis, A.E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: Evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit. Brain and Language, 40, 106-144.
  • Hillis, A.E., Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1999). When a rose is a rose in speech but a tulip in writing. Cortex, 35, 337-356.
  • Kandel, S., Álvarez, C.J., & Valleé, N. (2006). Syllables as processing units in a handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 18-31.
  • Kandel, S., & Valdois, S. (2006). Syllables as functional units in a copying task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 432-452.
  • Lambert, E., Kandel S., Fayol, M., & Espéret, E. (2008). The effect of the number of syllables on handwriting production. Reading and Writing, 21, 859-883.
  • Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
  • Levelt, W.J.M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269.
  • Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M.T., & Velay, J.L. (2005). The infl uence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119, 67-79.
  • Rapp, B., Epstein, C., & Tainturier, M.J. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 1-29.
  • Sebastián, N., Martí, M.A, Carreiras, M., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico Informatizado del Español. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
  • Tainturier, M.J., & Rapp, B. (2000). The spelling processes. In: B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 263-289). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Zesiger, P., Orliaguet, J.P., Boë, L.J. & Mounoud, P. (1994). The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production. In: C. Faure, G. Lorette & A. Vinter (Eds.), Advances in Handwriting and Drawing: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 389-401). Paris: Europia.