La infrahumanización de exogrupos en el mundoel papel de la similitud, la amistad intergrupal, el conocimiento del exogrupo y el estatus

  1. Rodríguez Pérez, Armando
  2. Delgado Rodríguez, Naira
  3. Betancor Rodríguez, Verónica
  4. Leyens, Jacques Philippe
  5. Vaes, Jeroen
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 27

Número: 3

Páginas: 679-687

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

Estudios sobre infrahumanización han confirmado que existe una mayor atribución de sentimientos al endogrupo que al exogrupo independientemente de la valencia de estas emociones. Sin embargo, las variables que conducen a la elección de qué exogrupos pueden ser infrahumanizados han recibido escasa atención. A través de este estudio se pretende determinar algunas de las variables relevantes en el dominio intergrupal que puedan provocar este tipo de prejuicio. El efecto de la similitud, amistad intergrupal, conocimiento del exogrupo y estatus se analizan en relación con la humanización de exogrupos de todo el mundo. Los resultados verificaron que no todos los exogrupos son igualmente humanizados. Un segundo hallazgo reveló que la similitud entre los grupos, la amistad y el conocimiento de los exogrupos incrementa la atribución de sentimientos hacia estos, mientras que el estatus no está relacionado con la humanización del exogrupo.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allport, G. A. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, M. A.: Addison-Wesley.
  • Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and race relations. In P. A. Katz (Ed.), Towards the Elimination of Racism (pp.245-280). New York: Pergamon.
  • Brauer, M. (2001). Intergroup perception in the social context: the effects of social status and group membership on perceived outgroup homogeneity and ethnocentrism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 15-31.
  • Castano, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: infra-humanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804-818.
  • Cortes, B. (2005). Looking for conditions leading to infra-humanization. Doctoral Thesis. Université Catholique de Louvain. Lovain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Cortes, B. P., Demoulin, S., Rodríguez-Torres, R. T., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., & Leyens, J.Ph. (2005). Infra-humanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 243-253.
  • Demoulin, S., Cortes, B. P., Viki, T. G., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Rodríguez-Torres, R.T., Paladino, M. P., Leyens, J.Ph. (in press). The role of ingroup identification in infra-humanization. International Journal of Psychology.
  • Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.Ph., Paladino, M. P., Rodríguez-Torres, R. T., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., & Dovidio, J. (2004). Dimensions of "uniquely" and "non-uniquely" human emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71-96.
  • Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.Ph., Rodríguez-Torres, R. T., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Paladino, P., & Fiske, S. (2005). Motivation to support a desired conclusion versus motivation to avoid an undesirable conclusion: the case of infra-humanization. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 416-428.
  • Demoulin, S., Rodríguez-Torres, R. T., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Vaes, J., Pala-dino, M. P., Gaunt, R., Cortes, B., & Leyens, J.Ph. (2004). Emotional prejudice can lead to infra-humanisation. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 259-296.
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
  • Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. S. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-489.
  • Hartley, E. L. (1946). Problems in prejudice. New York: King's Crown Press.
  • Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: an integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264.
  • Jahoda, G. (2002). On the origins of antagonism towards the Others. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 127, 1-16.
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. (1998). Defining dimensions of dis-tinctiveness: group variability makes a difference to differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1481-1492.
  • Kofta, M., Baran, T. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and infra-humanization of outgroupers. Unpublished paper.
  • Leyens, J.Ph., Paladino, P. M., Rodríguez-Torres, R. T., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: the attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and out-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197.
  • Leyens, J.Ph., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Rodríguez-Torres, R. T., Gaunt, R., Pa-ladino, P. M., Vaes, J., & Demoulin, S. (2001). Psychological essential-ism and the attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 395-411.
  • Oakes, P.J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher & M. S. Wetherell, Rediscovering the Social Group: a Self-categorization Theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
  • Oliner, S. P., & Oliner, P. M. (1988). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York: Free Press.
  • Paladino, M. P., Leyens, J.Ph., Rodríguez-Torres, R. T., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Gaunt, R., & Demoulin, S. (2002). Differential association of uniquely and non-uniquely human emotions to the ingroup and the outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 105-117.
  • Paladino, M. P., Vaes, J., & Castano, E. (2004). Emotional infra-humanization in intergroup relations: The role of national identification in the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to Italians and Germans. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 22, 519-536.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1984). The role of ignorance in inter-group relations. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact (pp. 229-256). New York: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: a Self-categorization Theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
  • Vaes, J., Paladino, M. P., Castelli, L., Leyens, J.Ph., & Giovanazzi, A. (2003). On the behavioral consequences of infra-humanization: The implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1016-1034.
  • Vanbeselaere, N. (1996). The impact of differentially valued overlapping categorizations upon the differentiation between positively, negatively, and neutrally evaluated social groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 75-96.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet