The student evaluation of teaching and the competence of students as evaluators.

  1. Dorta González, Pablo
  2. Dorta González, María Isabel
Revista:
Anales de ASEPUMA

ISSN: 2171-892X

Año de publicación: 2013

Número: 21

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de ASEPUMA

Resumen

Cuando se emplean las encuestas de satisfacción de los estudiantes universitarios en la promoción y el reconocimiento de sus docentes, una queja habitual es el impacto que las valoraciones sesgadas tienen sobre la media aritmética (empleada como medida de efectividad). Esto es especialmente significativo cuando el número de estudiantes que responden la encuesta es reducido. En este trabajo se presenta una nueva metodología que tiene en cuenta las percepciones que los estudiantes tienen de sus compañeros. Se proponen dos estimadores diferentes de la credibilidad de las puntuaciones de los estudiantes basados en propiedades de centralidad de la red social. Este método se basa en la idea que en la educación universitaria presencial los estudiantes conocen frecuentemente cuáles de sus compañeros son competentes a la hora de evaluar el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Algozzine, B., Beattie, J., Bray, M., Flowers, C., Gretes, J., Howley, L., Mohanty, G., & Spooner, F. (2004). “Student evaluation of college teaching: A practice in search of principles”. College Teaching, 52, (4), pp.134–141.
  • Bergstrom, C. (2007). “Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals”. C&RL News, 68(5), pp. 314–316.
  • Berk, R.A. (2005). “Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness”. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), pp. 48-62.
  • Brin, S.; Page, L. (1998). “The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine”. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, pp. 107–117.
  • Chen, Y.; Hoshower, L.B. (2003). “Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), pp. 71–88.
  • Clayson, D.E. (2009). “Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature”. Journal of Marketing Education, 31(16), pp. 16–30.
  • Coladarci, T., & Kornfield, I. (2007). “RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching”. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(6), pp. 1–15.
  • Crosier, D., Purser, L., & Schmidt, H. (2007). Trends V: Universities shaping the European Higher Education Area. Brussels: EUA.
  • Davison, E., & Price, J. (2009). “How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations”. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), pp. 51–65.
  • Denson, N., Loveday, T., & Dalton, H. (2010). “Student evaluation of courses: What predicts satisfaction?” Higher Education Research and Development,29(4), pp. 339–356
  • El Hassan, K. (2009). “Investigating substantive and consequential validity of student ratings of instruction”. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(3), pp. 319–333.
  • Frick, T.W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y., & Green, P. (2009). “College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality”. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, pp. 705–720.
  • Harvey, L. (2003). “Student feedback”. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1), pp. 3–20.
  • Hubbell, C.H. (1965). “An input–output approach to clique identification”. Sociometry, 28(4), pp. 377–399.
  • Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2009). “Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance”. Learning Environments Research, 12, pp. 15–29.
  • Kogan, L.R., Schoenfeld Tacher, R., & Hellyer, P.W. (2010). “Student evaluations of teaching: Perceptions of faculty based on gender, position, and rank”. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), pp. 623 – 636.
  • Kwan, K.P. (1999). “How fair are student ratings in assessing the teaching performance of university teachers?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(2), pp. 181–195.
  • Leontief, W.W. (1941). The structure of American economy, 1919–1939. An empirical application of equilibrium analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Witcher, A.E., Collins, K.M.T., Filer, J.D., Wiedmaier, C.D., & Moore., C.W. (2007). “Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-methods analysis”. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), pp. 113–160.
  • Penny, A.R. (2003). “Changing the agenda for research into students’ views about university teaching: Four shortcomings of SRT research”. Teaching in Higher Education 8(3), pp. 399–411.
  • Pillai, S.U., Suel, T., & Cha, S. (2005).” The Perron–Frobenius theorem: Some of its applications”. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(2), pp. 62–75.
  • Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). “Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to literature of physics”. Information Processing and Management, 12(5), pp. 297–312.
  • Slate, J.R., Laprairie, K.N., Schulte, D.P., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2011). “Views of effective college faculty: A mixed analysis”. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3), pp. 331–346.
  • Spencer, K.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (2002). “Student perspectives on teaching and its evaluation”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), pp. 397–409.
  • Symbaluk, D.G., & Howell, A.J. (2010). “Web-based student feedback: Comparing teaching-award and research-award recipients”. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1), pp. 75–86.
  • Timmerman, T. (2008). “On the validity of Ratemyprofessors.com”. Journal of Education for Business, 84, pp. 55–61.
  • Wachtel, H.K. (1998). “Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: Abrief review”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), pp. 191–211.
  • Wright, R.E. (2006). “Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and possible solutions”. College Student Journal, 40, pp. 417–422.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet