La resolución de problemas, tecnología y comprensión del concepto de integral definida

Referencias bibliográficas

• ARTIGUE, M. (2002): «Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and de dialectics between technical and conceptual work». International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, núm. 7(3), pp. 245-274.
• CAMACHO, M.; DEPOOL, R. (2003): «Un estudio gráfico y numérico del cálculo de la Integral Definida utilizando el Programa de Cálculo Simbólico (PCS) DERIVE». Educación Matemática, núm. 15(3), pp. 119-140.
• CAMACHO, M.; DEPOOL, R.; SANTOSTRIGO, L.M. (2010): «Students’ use of DERIVE software in comprehending and making sense of definite integral and area concepts», en HITT, F.; HOLTON, D.; THOMPSON, P.W. (eds.): Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education VII, CBMS series. Vol. 16. Providence. American Mathematical Society, pp. 29-61.
• CHICK, H., y otros (2001): Proceedings of the 12th ICMI study conference the future of the teaching and learning of algebra. Melbourne. The University of Melbourne
• CUOCO, A. (2002): «Thoughts on reading Artigue’s ‘Learning mathematics in a CAS environment’». International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, núm. 7(3), pp. 293-299.
• DRIJVERS, P. (2002): «Learning mathematics in a computer algebra environment: Obstacles are opportunities». ZDM, núm. 34(5), pp. 221-228.
• DUVAL, R. (1993): «Registres de représentation sémiotique et fonctionnement cognitif de la pensée». Annales de Didactique et de Science Cognitives, núm. 5, pp. 37-65.
• GOLDIN, G.A. (1998) : «Representations, learning, and problem solving in mathematics». Journal of Mathematical Behavior, núm. 17(2), pp. 137-165.
• GUIN, D.; TROUCHE, L. (1999): «The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: the case of calculators». International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, núm. 3(3), pp. 195-227.
• GUIN, D.; TROUCHE, L. (2002): «Mastering by the teacher of the instrumental genesis in CAS environments: Necessity of instrumental orchestrations». ZDM, núm. 34(5), pp. 204-211.
• HEID, K.M. (2002): «How theories about the learning and knowing of mathematics can inform the use of CAS in school mathematics: One perspective». The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, núm. 9(2), pp. 95-112.
• HOLTON, D. (Ed.) (2001): The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study. Dordrecth. Kluwer.
• KING, K.; HILLEL, J.; ARTIGUE, M. (2001): «Technology. A working group report», en HOLTON, D. (ed.): The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study. Dordrecth. Kluwer, pp. 349-356.
• RABARDEL, P. (1995) : Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Oaris. Armand Colin.
• RUTHVEN, K. (2002): «Instrumenting mathematical activity: Reflections on key studies of the educational use of computer algebra systems». International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, núm. 7(3), pp. 275-291.
• SANTOS, M. (2000): «The Use of representations as a Vehicle to Promote Students’ Mathematical Thinking in Problem Solving». The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, núm. 7 (3), pp. 193-212.
• THOMPSON, P.W.; SALDANHA, L.A. (2003): «Fractions and multiplicative reasoning», en KILPATRICK, J.; MARTIN, W.G.; SCHIFTER, D. (eds.): A research companion to principle and tandards for school mathematics, Reston, VA. The Council, pp. 95-113.
• THURSTON, W.P. (1994): «On proof and progress in mathematics». Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, núm. 30(2), pp. 161-177.
• TROUCHE, L. (2005): «An instrumental approach to mathematics learning in symbolic calculator environment», en GUIN, D.; RUTHVEN, K.; TROUCHE, L. (eds.): The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators. Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Nueva York. Springer, pp. 137-162.