The Teaching of Academic Writing to English as a Second Language Students: A Functional Genre-Based Approach

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, Wi: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
• Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes, 16, 313-319.
• Bhatia, V. K. (2002). A generic view of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 21-39). Harlow: Longman.
• Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 47-59.
• Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical structure. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 196-215). Harlow: Longman.
• Burgess, S., & Cargill, M. (2013). Using genre analysis and corpus linguistics to teach research article writing. In V. Matarese (Ed.), Supporting research writing: Roles and challenges in multilingual settings (pp. 55-71). Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
• Burgess, S., & Fagan, A. (2002). (Kid) gloves on or off?: Academic conflict in research articles across the disciplines. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 44, 79-96.
• Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Dudley-Evans, T. (1995). Common-core and specific approaches to the teaching of academic writing. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 293-312). Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). Issues in EAP: A preliminary perspective. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 8-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric (pp. 1-15). London: Taylor and Francis.
• García-Mayo, M. P. (2000). English for specific purposes: Discourse analysis and course design. Universidad del País Vasco.
• Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 321-337.
• Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-122.
• Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourse. Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113-135.
• Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-720.
• Jacoby, S., Leech, D., & Holten, C. (1995). A genre-based developmental writing course for undergraduate ESL science majors. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 351-373). Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Johns, A. M. (1995). Teaching classroom and authentic genres: Initiating students into academic cultures and discourses. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 277-292). Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Lorés-Sanz, R. (2009). (Non-) critical voices in the reviewing of history discourse: A cross-cultural study of evaluation. In K. Hyland, & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 143-160). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Martín-Martín, P. (2005). The rhetoric of the abstract in English and Spanish scientific discourse: A cross-cultural genre-analytic approach. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Martín-Martín, P. (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies, 8, 133-152.
• Martín-Martín, P., & León Pérez, I. (forthcoming). Convincing peers of the value of one’s research: A genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts. English for Specific Purposes.
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as a social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167. (1994). Reprinted in A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67-78). London: Taylor and Francis.
• Moreno, A. I. (1998). The explicit signalling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework. Text, 18, 545-585.
• Moreno, A. I. (2011). English for research publication purposes and crosscultural academic discourse analysis. In J. Ruano, M. Fernández, M. Borham, M. Díaz, S. Bautista, P. Álvarez & B. García (Eds.), Current trends in Anglophone studies: Cultural, linguistic and literary research (pp. 53-69). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
• Moreno, A. I., Rey-Rocha, J., Burgess, S., López-Navarro, I., & Sachdev, I. (2012). Spanish researchers’ perceived difficulty writing research articles for English-medium journals: The impact of proficiency in English versus publication experience. Ibérica, 24, 157-184
• Mur Dueñas, P. (2010). A contrastive analysis of research article introductions in English and Spanish. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 61, 119-133.
• Paltridge, B. (2002). Academic literacies and changing university communities. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 44, 15-28.
• Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 139-160.
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 149-170.
• Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 238-251.
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. English for Academic Purposes, 7, 250-263.
• Ventola, E. (1997). Modalization: Probability - an exploration into its role in academic writing. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles in academic discourse (pp.157-180). Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
• Williams, I. A. (1999). Results section of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347-366.
• Yunick, S. (1997). Genres, registers and sociolinguistics. World Englishes, 16, 321-336.