Efficiency of artificial collectors for quantitative assessment of sea urchin settlement rates

  1. Balsalobre, Marc 1
  2. Wangensteen, Owen S. 2
  3. Palacín, Creu 2
  4. Clemente, Sabrina 1
  5. Hernández, José Carlos 1
  1. 1 Biodiversidad, Ecología Marina y Conservación, Departamento de Biología Animal (Ciencias Marinas), Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Laguna
  2. 2 Dept. Biología Animal, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBIO). Universitat de Barcelona
Revista:
Scientia Marina

ISSN: 0214-8358

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 80

Número: 2

Páginas: 207-216

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/SCIMAR.04252.13A DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Scientia Marina

Resumen

En este trabajo comparamos la eficacia de tres tipos diferentes de colectores artificiales diseñados para cuantificar la tasa de asentamiento larvario en equinoideos. Los tres tipos de colectores utilizados en el estudio fueron: (1) mallas de nylon rellenas con biofiltros esféricos de plástico, (2) cepillos verticales con cerdas de fibra vegetal y (3) alfombras horizontales triangulares de fibra de coco. Se determinó la eficacia de recolección mediante el recuento de las post-larvas de dos especies de erizo de mar (Paracentrotus lividus y Arbacia lixula) capturadas por cada colector, en dos áreas geográficas diferentes: Tenerife (Islas Canarias, Atlántico Oriental) y Tossa de Mar (Costa Brava, Mediterráneo noroccidental). El colector de biobolas de plástico demostró ser el diseño más eficaz de los tres comparados, al capturar un mayor número de post-larvas de ambas especies de erizo en todas las condiciones ensayadas y con una mayor reproducibilidad que los otros dos diseños. Por tanto, recomendamos el uso de los colectores de “biofilters balls” de plástico para el diseño de futuros experimentos que tengan como objetivo la cuantificación de las tasas de asentamiento de equinoideos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson M.J. 2004. PERMANOVA 2-factor: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance using permutation tests. Department of Statistics, Univ. Auckland, Auckland.
  • Anderson M.J. 2005. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Department of Statistics, Univ. Auckland, Auckland.
  • Bak R.P.M. 1985. Recruitment patterns and mass mortalities in the sea urchin Diadema antillarum. Proc. 5th Int. Coral Reef Congress. 5: 267-272.
  • Balch T., Scheibling R.E. 2000. Temporal and spatial variability in settlement and recruitment of echinoderms in kelp beds and barrens in Nova Scotia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 205: 139-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps205139
  • Balch T., Scheibling R.E. 2001. Larval supply, settlement and recruitment in echinoderms. Echinoderm Studies 6: 1-83.
  • Balch T., Scheibling R.E., Harris L.G., et al. 1998. Variation in settlement of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in the northwest Atlantic: effects of spatial scale and sampling method. In: Mooi M., Telford M. (eds), Echinoderms. San Francisco. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 555-560.
  • Bonaviri C., Fernández T.V., Fanelli G., et al. 2011. Leading role of the sea urchin Arbacia lixula in maintaining the barren state in southwestern Mediterranean. Mar. Biol. 158(11): 2505-2513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1751-2
  • Bonaviri C., Gianguzza P., Pipitone C., et al. 2012. Micropredation on sea urchins as a potential stabilizing process for rocky reefs. J. Sea Res. 73: 18-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.06.003
  • Bulleri F., Benedetti-Cecchi L., Cinelli F. 1999. Grazing by the sea urchins Arbacia lixula L. and Paracentrotus lividus Lam. in the Northwest Mediterranean. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 241: 81-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00073-8
  • Byrne M. 1990. Annual reproductive cycles of the commercial sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus from an exposed intertidal and a sheltered subtidal habitat on the west coast of Ireland. Mar. Biol. 104: 275-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01313269
  • Cameron R.A., Schroeter S.C. 1980. Sea urchin recruitment: effect of substrate selection on juvenile distribution. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2: 243-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps002243
  • Clarke K.R., Gorley R.N. 2006. PRIMER v6: User manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth.
  • Clemente S., Hernández J.C., Brito A. 2009. Evidence of the top– down role of predators in structuring sublittoral rocky-reef communities in a Marine Protected Area and nearby areas of the Canary Islands. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66: 64-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn176
  • Clemente S., Hernández J.C., Montaño-Moctezuma G., et al. 2013. Predators of juvenile sea urchins and the effect of habitat refuges. Mar. Biol. 160: 579-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-2114-3
  • Ebert T.A., Schroeter S.C., Dixon J.D., et al. 1994. Settlement patterns of red and purple sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus) in California, USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 111: 41-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps111041
  • Fenaux L. 1968. Maturation des gonades et cycle saisonnier des larves chez A. lixula, P. lividus et P. microtuberculatus (echinides) à Villefranche-Sur-Mer. Vie Milieu 19: 1-52.
  • García-Sanz S., Tuya F., Navarro P.G., et al. 2012. Post larval, short-term, colonization patterns: the effect of substratum complexity across subtidal, adjacent, habitats. Est. Coast. Shelf. Sci. 112: 183-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.014
  • García-Sanz S., Navarro P.G., Tuya F. 2014. Contrasting recruitment seasonality of sea urchin species in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands (eastern Atlantic). Medit. Mar. Sci. 15: 475-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.547
  • Girard D., Hernández J.C., Toledo K., et al. 2006. Aproximación a la biología reproductiva del equinoideo Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) en el litoral de Tenerife. Proceedings of the XIV SIEBM.
  • Guidetti P., Dul?i? J. 2007. Relationships among predatory fish, sea urchins and barrens in Mediterranean rocky reefs across a latitudinal gradient. Mar. Environ. Res. 63(2): 168-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.08.002 PMid:17034843
  • Guidetti P., Fraschetti S., Terlizzi A., et al. 2003. Distribution patterns of sea urchins and barrens in shallow Mediterranean rocky reefs impacted by the illegal fishery of the rock-boring mollusc Lithophaga lithophaga. Mar. Biol. 143: 1135-1142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-003-1163-z
  • Harrold C., Pearse J.S. 1987. The ecological role of echinoderms in kelp forests. Echinoderm Studies 2: 137-233.
  • Harrold C., Lisin S., Light K.H., et al. 1991. Isolating settlement from recruitment of sea urchins. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 147: 81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(91)90038-X
  • Herbst D.B., Silldorff E.L. 2006. Comparison of the performance of different bioassessment methods: similar evaluations of biotic integrity from separate programs and procedures. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 25(2): 513-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[513:COTPOD]2.0.CO;2
  • Hereu B., Zabala M., Linares C., et al. 2004. Temporal and spatial variability in settlement of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the NW Mediterranean. Mar. Biol. 144: 1011-1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-003-1266-6
  • Hereu B., Linares C., Sala E., et al. 2012. Multiple processes regulate long-term population dynamics of sea urchins on Mediterranean rocky reefs. PloS ONE 7: e36901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036901 PMid:22606306 PMCid:PMC3350477
  • Hernández J.C., Toledo K., Girard D., et al. 2005. Descripción de la post-larva y primeras fases juveniles de tres equinoideos presentes en las islas Canarias: Diadema antillarum (Philippi, 1845), Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) y Arbaciella elegans (Mortensen, 1910). Vieraea 33: 385-397.
  • Hernández J.C., Brito A., Cubero E., et al. 2006. Temporal patterns of larval settlement of Diadema antillarum (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in the Canary Islands using an experimental larval collector. Bull. Mar. Sci. 78: 271-279.
  • Hernández J.C., Clemente S., Sangil C., et al. 2008. The key role of the sea urchin Diadema aff. antillarum in controlling macroalgae assemblages throughout the Canary Islands (eastern subtropical Atlantic): an spatio-temporal approach. Mar. Env. Res. 66: 259-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.03.002 PMid:18479745
  • Hernández J.C., Clemente S., Girard D., et al. 2010. Effect of temperature on settlement and postsettlement survival in a barrens-forming sea urchin. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 413: 69-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps08684
  • Hernández J.C., Clemente S., Tuya F., et al. 2013. Echinoderms of the Canary Islands, Spain. In: Alvarado J.J., Solis-Marin F.A., Echinoderm Research and Diversity in Latin America. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp. 471-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20051-9_15
  • Horwitz W. 1982. Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulation of foods and drugs. Anal. Chem. 54(1), 67A-76A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00238a765
  • Hunte W., Younglao D. 1988. Recruitment and population recovery of Diadema antillarum (Echinodermata; Echinoidea) in Barbados. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 45: 109-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps045109
  • Irusta J.M.G., Jordana J.C.C., Ansorena F.J. 2008. El erizo de mar común (Paracentrotus lividus) en Cantabria: Estudio para una explotación sostenible. Locustella: Anuario de la Naturaleza de Cantabria 5: 58-67.
  • Jennings L.B., Hunt H.L. 2010. Settlement, recruitment and potential predators and competitors of juvenile echinoderms in the rocky subtidal zone. Mar. Biol. 157(2): 307-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1318-7
  • Keesing J.K., Cartwright C.M., Hall K.C. 1993. Measuring settlement intensity of echinoderms on coral reefs. Mar. Biol. 117: 399-407.
  • Kempf M. 1962. Recherches d'écologie comparée sur Paracentrotus lividus (Lmk.) et Arbacia lixula (L.). Rec Trav St Mar Endoume 25: 47-115.
  • Lamare M.D., Barker M.F. 2001. Settlement and recruitment of the New Zealand sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 218: 153-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps218153
  • Lambert D.M., Harris L.G. 2000. Larval settlement of the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in the southern Gulf of Maine. Invertebr. Biol. 119: 403-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2000.tb00110.x
  • Lawrence J.M. 1975. On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 13: 213-286.
  • Loosanoff V.L. 1964. Variations in time and intensity of setting of the starfish, Asterias forbesi, in Long Island Sound during a twenty-five-year period. Biol. Bull. 126: 423-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1539311
  • López S., Turon X., Montero E., et al. 1998. Larval abundance, recruitment and early mortality in Paracentrotus lividus (Echinoidea). Interannual variability and plankton-benthos coupling. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 72: 239-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps172239
  • Lozano J., Galera J., López S., et al. 1995. Biological cycles and recruitment of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in two contrasting habitats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 122: 179-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps122179
  • Micheli F., Benedetti-Cecchi L., Gambaccini S., et al. 2005. Cascading human impacts, marine protected areas, and the structure of Mediterranean reef assemblages. Ecol. Monogr. 75(1): 81-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-4058
  • Miller B.A., Emlet R.B. 1997. Influence of nearshore hydrodynamics on larval abundance and settlement of sea urchins Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus in the Oregon upwelling zone. Oceanogr. Lit. Rev. 44: 980-981. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps148083
  • Ólafsson E.B., Peterson C.H., Ambrose W.G.Jr. 1994. Does recruitment limitation structure populations and communities of macro-invertebrates in marine soft sediments: the relative significance of pre-and post-settlement processes. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 32: 65-109.
  • Palacín C., Giribet G., Carner S., et al. 1998. Low densities of sea urchins influence the structure of algal assemblages in the western Mediterranean. J. Sea Res. 39: 281-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(97)00061-0
  • Pawlik J.R. 1992. Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 30: 273-335.
  • Pinnegar J.K., Polunin N.V.C. 1999. Differential fractionation of ?13 C and ?15 N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions. Funct. Ecol. 13(2): 225-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00301.x
  • Privitera D., Chiantore M., Mangialajo L., et al. 2008. Inter-and intra-specific competition between Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula in resource-limited barren areas. J. Sea Res. 60: 184-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2008.07.001
  • Privitera D., Noli M., Falugi C., et al. 2011. Benthic assemblages and temperature effects on Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula larvae and settlement. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 407: 6-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.06.030
  • Régis M.B. 1978. Croissance de deux échinoïdes du golfe de Marseille (Paracentrotus lividus (Lmk) et Arbacia lixula L.). Aspects écologiques de la microstructure du squelette et de l'évolution des indices physiologiques. Ph.D. thesis. Univ. Aix- Marseille III., 221 pp.
  • Rowley R.J. 1989. Settlement and recruitment of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus spp.) in a sea-urchin barren ground and a kelp bed: are populations regulated by settlement or post-settlement processes? Mar. Biol. 100: 485-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00394825
  • Sala E., Zabala M. 1996. Fish predation and the structure of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus populations in the NW Mediterranean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 140: 71-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps140071
  • Sala E., Ribes M., Hereu B., et al. 1998. Temporal variability in abundance of the sea urchins Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula in the northwestern Mediterranean: comparison between a marine reserve and an unprotected area. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 168: 135-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps168135
  • Sánchez-Espa-a A.I., Martínez-Pita I., García F.J. 2004. Gonadal growth and reproduction in the commercial sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) from southern Spain. Hydrobiologia 519: 61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000026485.40173.02
  • Sangil C., Sansón M., Clemente S., et al. 2014. Contrasting the species abundance, species density and diversity of seaweed assemblages in alternative states: Urchin density as a driver of biotic homogenization. J. Sea Res. 85: 92–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.10.009
  • Tegner M.J. 1989. The feasibility of enhancing red sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus, stocks in California: an analysis of the options. Mar. Fish. Rev. 51: 1-22.
  • Tomas F., Romero J., Turon X. 2004. Settlement and recruitment of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in two contrasting habitats in the Mediterranean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 282: 173-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps282173
  • Tuya F., Cisneros-Aguirre J., Ortega-Borges L., et al. 2007. Bathymetric segregation of sea urchins on reefs of the Canarian Archipelago: role of flow-induced forces. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 73: 481-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.02.007
  • Uthicke S., Schaffelke B., Byrne M. 2009. A boom-bust phylum? Ecological and evolutionary consequences of density variations in echinoderms. Ecol. Monogr. 79: 3-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-2136.1
  • Verlaque M. 1987. Relations entre Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) et le phytobenthos de Méditerranée occidentale. In: Boudouresque C.F. (ed.), Colloque International sur Paracentrotus lividus et les oursins comestibles. GIS Posidonie publ. Marseille, pp. 5-36.
  • Victor B.C. 1986. Larval settlement and juvenile mortality in a recruitment-limited coral reef fish population. Ecol. Monogr. 56: 145-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942506
  • Wangensteen O.S., Turon X., García-Cisneros A., et al. 2011. A wolf in sheep's clothing: carnivory in dominant sea urchins in the Mediterranean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 441: 117-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps09359
  • Wangensteen O.S., Turon X., Pérez-Portela R., et al. 2012. Natural or naturalized? Phylogeography suggests that the abundant sea urchin Arbacia lixula is a recent colonizer of the Mediterranean. PLoS ONE, 7: e45067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045067 PMid:23028765 PMCid:PMC3444468
  • Wangensteen O.S., Dupont S., Casties I., et al. 2013a. Some like it hot: Temperature and pH modulate larval development and settlement of the sea urchin Arbacia lixula. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 449: 304-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.10.007
  • Wangensteen O.S., Turon X., Casso M., et al. 2013b. The reproductive cycle of the sea urchin Arbacia lixula in northwest Mediterranean: potential influence of temperature and photoperiod. Mar. Biol. 160: 3157-3168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2303-8
  • Zar J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. PMid:6436396
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet