Directionality Effect in Double Conditionals

  1. Espino Morales, Orlando
  2. Sánchez Curbelo, Isana
  3. Bolaños Medina, Alicia
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 18

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2015.42 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumo

Directionality effect in deductive reasoning is a very well-known phenomenon that shows that the percentage of forward or backward inferences that participants make depends on the conditional form used. A new extension of the semantic hypothesis (Oberauer & Wilhelm, 2000) is presented to explain the directionality effect in double conditionals with different directionality. This hypothesis claims that the directional effect depends on which term plays the role of relatum. It also makes several novel claims which have been confirmed in three experiments: Experiments 1 and 2 showed there were more forward than backward inferences when the end-term that played the role of relatum was in the first premise, experiment 1: t (45) = 2.73, p < .01, experiment 2: t (38) = 12.06, p < .05, but there were more backward than forward inferences when the end-term that played the role of relatum was in the second premise, experiment 1: t (45) = 2.84, p < .01, experiment 2: t (38) = 2.21, p < .04. Experiment 3 showed that there was no directional effect when both end-terms played the role of relatum, t (34) = 1.39, p = .17, or when both middle-terms (or neither of the end-terms) played the role of relatum, t (34) = .78, p = .44. These experiments confirmed the predictions of the new extension of the semantic hypothesis.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Broadbent D. (1958). Perception and communication. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
  • Espino O., & Hernández E. (2009). Efectos de direccionalidad en condicionales [Directionality effects in conditionals]. Psicológica, 30, 41–57.
  • Espino O., & Santamaría C. (2013). Presentation format and syllogistic reasoning. Psicológica, 34, 313–26.
  • Espino O., & Santamaría C. (2008). Initial models in conditionals: Evidence from priming. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 36–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S1138741600004091
  • Espino O., Santamaría C., & García-Madruga J. A. (2000). Activation of end-terms in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 6, 67–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 135467800393939
  • Evans J. St. B. T. (1977). Linguistic factors in reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 297–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640747708400605
  • Evans J. St. B. T. (1993). The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: Critical appraisal and revision. Cognition, 48, 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0010-0277(93)90056-2
  • Evans J. St. B. T., & Beck M. A. (1981). Directionality and temporal factors in conditional reasoning. Current Psychological Research, 1, 111–120. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02684483
  • Evans J. St. B. T., Newstead S. E., & Byrne R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
  • Gernsbacher M. A. (1991). Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 81–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690969108406939
  • Grosset N., & Barrouillet P. (2003). On the nature of mental models of conditionals: The case of if, if then, and only if. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 289–384. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/1354678034000240
  • Johnson-Laird P. N. (1984). Syllogistic inference. Cognition, 16, 1–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(84)90035-0
  • Logan G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1004
  • Oberauer K., Hörnig R., Weidenfeld A., & Wilhelm O. (2005). Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: II. Premise integration and conclusion evaluation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 1225–1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 02724980443000566
  • Oberauer K., & Wilhelm O. (2000). Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: I. The comprehension of single relational premises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1702–1712. http://dx. doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1702
  • Santamaría C., & Espino O. (2002). Conditionals and directionality: On the meaning of If vs. only if. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 41–57. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/02724980143000145
Fonte de datos: Dialnet