Valoración de la repercusión del dolor sobre la productividad laboralvalidación del cuestionario WPAI:Pain

  1. Varela, N. 1
  2. Guillén Grima, F. 2
  3. Pérez Cajaraville, J. J. 3
  4. Pérez Hernández, C. 4
  5. Monedero, P. 5
  1. 1 Departamento de Anestesiología y Reanimación Hospital San Pedro C/ Piqueras 98 26006 Logroño
  2. 2 Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona
  3. 3 Unidad Funcional del Tratamiento del Dolor, Grupo Universitario HM Hospitales, Madrid
  4. 4 Unidad de Dolor, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid
  5. 5 Departamento de Anestesiología y Cuidados Intensivos, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona - Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona
Revue:
Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra

ISSN: 1137-6627

Année de publication: 2016

Volumen: 39

Número: 1

Pages: 77-85

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4321/S1137-6627/2016000100009 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

            Background. Health measuring instruments are essential in daily clinical practice. However, a validation process is needed in order to certify the validity and reliability of it. The aim of our study is to validate a questionnaire to assess the consequences of pain in work productivity.             Methods. Based on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire - General Health we have created a modified version called WPAI:Pain in order to be able to measure the consequences of pain in work productivity. The study was conducted following the usual guidelines of test validation, omitting face validity as WPAI:Pain is a modification of an existing questionnaire. Validity and reliability were calculated.             Results. A total of 577 questionnaires were obtained in 2 spanish university hospitals. The questionnaire’s discriminating power was verified by Mann-Whitney test. Reliability tests were realized, Cronbach's alpha was 0.896 and Guttman split-half was 0.921. Stability was evaluated with a test-retest which was significant. Construct validity was established by Pearson correlation comparing the results of the questionnaire with the pain visual analog scale, which was statistically significant for all values.                Conclusions. The WPAI:Pain questionnaire is a valid instrument for measuring the consequences of pain in work productivity. It is currently the only one validated in Spanish. Major studies are needed in order to establish its universal validity.             Keywords. Pain. Questionnaire design. Validation. Reliability.