Home and group-based implementation of the "Growing Up Happily in the Family" program in at-risk psychosocial contexts

  1. Miriam Alvarez 1
  2. Sonia Padilla 1
  3. Mª Luisa Máiquez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Psychosocial Intervention

ISSN: 1132-0559

Datum der Publikation: 2016

Ausgabe: 25

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 69-78

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1016/J.PSI.2016.03.006 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Psychosocial Intervention


«Crecer Felices en Familia» es un programa para prevenir el maltrato infantil dirigido a padres y madres con hijos/as de entre 0 y 5 años que se encuentran en contextos de riesgo psicosocial. El programa cuenta con una modalidad grupal y una modalidad domiciliaria. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto de varios componentes de la implementación de la versión grupal y domiciliaria en el cambio de actitudes parentales relacionadas con el desarrollo infantil y la educación. Padres y madres en situación de riesgo y de no riesgo participaron en la modalidad grupal (196 participantes en 26 grupos) y en la modalidad domiciliaria (95 participantes) desarrolladas a través de los servicios sociales. Se analizaron la adherencia al programa, las adaptaciones, la respuesta de los participantes, la calidad del desarrollo y las barreras de la implementación como predictores de los cambios en actitudes parentales. Los resultados mostraron que la adherencia al programa, la calidad del desarrollo, la respuesta de los participantes y el clima positivo predicen cambios en las actitudes parentales en ambas modalidades del programa. Es importante tener en cuenta la calidad del proceso de implementación cuando se evalúa la efectividad de las intervenciones grupales y domiciliarias para las familias en situación de riesgo.

Informationen zur Finanzierung

We would like to express our appreciation to all the social agents of the municipalities of the Autonomous Communities of Castile and Leon, Canary Islands, and Catalonia in Spain, as well as the parents who participated in this study. The evaluation of the program was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the European Regional Development Fund under the Grant PSI2015-69971-R (MINECO/FEDER).


Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Almeida, A., Abreu-Lima, I., Cruz, O., Gaspar, M. F., Brandao, T., Alarcao,M., et al. (2012). Parent education interventions: Results from a nationalstudy in Portugal. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 135–149.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.647865
  • Almeida, A., Alarcão, M., Brandão, T., Cruz, O., Gaspar, M. F., Abreu-Lima, I., et al.(2008). Avaliac¸ ão da satisfac¸ ão e eficácia do programa de formac¸ ão parental.Manuscrito não publicado.
  • Azar, S. T., & Weinzierl, K. M. (2005). Child maltreatment and childhood injuryresearch: A cognitive behavioral approach. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30,598–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsi046
  • Barlow, J., Smailagic, N., Huband, N., Roloff, V., & Bennett, C. (2012). Group-based par-ent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health. CampbellSystematic Reviews, 6 http://dx.doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.15
  • Barth, R. P. (2009). Preventing child abuse and neglect with parent training: Evidenceand opportunities. Future of Children, 19, 95–118.
  • Barth, R. P., Landsverk, J., Chamberlain, P., Reid, J. B., Rolls, J. A., Hurlburt, M. S., et al.(2005). Parent-training programs in child welfare services: Planning for a moreevidence-based approach to serving biological parents. Research on Social WorkPractice, 15, 353–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049731505276321
  • Bavolek, S. J. (1989). Assessing and treating high-risk parenting attitudes.Early Child Development and Care, 42, 99–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0300443890420107
  • Bavolek, S. J., & Keene, R. G. (2001). Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory AAPI-2:Administration and development handbook. Park City, UT: Family DevelopmentResources, Inc.
  • Baydar, N., Reid, M. J., & Webster-Stratton, C. (2003). The role of mental healthfactors and program engagement in the effectiveness of a preventive par-enting program for Head Start mothers. Child Development, 74, 1433–1453.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00616
  • Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the piecestogether: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science,12, 23–33.
  • Bower-Russa, M. (2005). Attitudes mediate the association between childhood dis-ciplinary history and disciplinary responses. Child Maltreatment, 10, 272–282.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077559505277531
  • Bower-Russa, M., Knutson, J. F., & Winebarger, A. (2001). Disciplinary history, adultdisciplinary attitudes, and risk for abusive parenting. Journal of Community Psy-chology, 29, 219–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcop.1015
  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  • Breitenstein, S. M., Gross, D., Fogg, L., Ridge, A., Garvey, C., Julion, W., et al. (2012).The Chicago Parent Program: Comparing 1-year outcomes for African Americanand Latino parents of young children. Research in Nursing & Health, 35, 475–489.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21489
  • Burke, J., Chandy, J., Dannerbeck, A., & Watt, J. W. (1998). The parental environmentcluster model of child neglect: An integrative conceptual model. Child Welfare,77, 389–405.
  • Byrne, S., Rodrigo, M. J., & Máiquez, M. L. (2014). Patterns of individual changein a parenting program for child maltreatment and their relation to fam-ily and professional environments. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38, 457–467.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.12.008
  • Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Stephen, W., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A con-ceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 1–9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
  • Ceballo, R., & McLoyd, V. (2002). Social support and parenting in poor, dan-gerous neighborhoods. Child Development, 73, 1310–1321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00473
  • Chaffin, M., Hecht, D., Bard, D., Silovsky, J. F., & Beasley, W. (2012). A statewide trial ofSafeCare home-based services model with parents in child protective services.Pediatrics, 129, 509–515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds. 2011-1840
  • Chiapa, A., Smith, J. D., Kim, H., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015).The trajectory of fidelity in a multiyear trial of the family check-up predictschange in child problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,83, 1006–1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000034
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (2003). Maternal self-efficacy beliefs, competence inparenting, and toddlers’ behavior and development status. Infant Mental HealthJournal, 24, 126–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/imhj.10048
  • Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H.(2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture.American Psychologist, 55, 218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.218
  • Cowen, P. S. (2001). Effectiveness of a parent education intervention forat-risk families. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 6(2), 73–82.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2001.tb00124.x
  • Crittenden, P., Lang, C., Claussen, A., & Partridge, M. (2000). Relations among moth-ers’ procedural, semantic, and episodic internal representational models ofparenting. In P. Crittenden, & A. Claussen (Eds.), The organization of attach-ment relationships: Maturation, culture, and context (pp. 214–233). New York:Cambridge University Press.
  • Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and secondaryprograms: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review,18, 23–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00043-3
  • De Wolff, M., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68,571–591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04218.x
  • Domitrovich, C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2000). The study of implementa-tion: Current finding from effective programs for school-aged children.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11, 193–221.http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1102 04
  • Durlak, J. A., & Dupre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research onthe influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affect-ing implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
  • Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A reviewof research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuseprevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.237
  • Eames, C., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Whitaker, C. J., Jones, K., Hughes, J. C., et al. (2009).Treatment fidelity as a predictor of behaviour change in parents attendinggroup-based parent training. Child Care, Health and Development, 35, 603–612.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00975.x
  • Echeburúa, E., & Corral, P. (1998). Manual de violencia familiar. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Elliot, D., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effectiveprevention programs. Prevention Science, 5, 47–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013981.28071.52
  • Estefan, L. F., Coulter, M. L., VandeWeerd, C. L., Armstrong, M., & Gorski, P.(2013). Relationships between stressors and parenting attitudes in a childwelfare parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 199–208.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9569-1
  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., & Friedman, R. M. (2005). Implementationresearch: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida,Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National ImplementationResearch Network.
  • Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2005). Evaluating fidelity:Predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregonmodel of parent management training (PMTO). Behavior Therapy, 36, 3–13.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80049-8
  • Garvey, C., Julion, W., Fogg, L., Kratovil, A., & Gross, D. (2006). Measuring participationin a prevention trial with parents of young children. Research in Nursing andHealth, 29, 212–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20127
  • Gross, D., Garvey, C., Julion, W., Fogg, L., Tucker, S., & Mokros, H. (2009).Efficacy of the Chicago Parent Program with low-income African Ameri-can and Latino parents of young children. Prevention Science, 10, 54–65.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0116-7
  • Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methodson the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of cur-rent points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.4
  • Johnson, M. A., Stone, S., Lou, C., Ling, J., Claassen, J., & Austin, M. J. (2010). Assessingparent education programs for families involved with child welfare services:Evidence and implications. In M. J. Austin (Ed.), Evidence for child welfare practice(pp. 191–234). New York: Routledge.
  • Jones, B. J. (2010). Home visitation with psychologically vulnerable families. Zero toThree, 30, 44–51.
  • Jones, T. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in par-ent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 341–363.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004
  • Jung, L. (2003). More is better: Maximizing natural learning opportunities. YoungExceptional Children, 6, 21–26.
  • Kaminski, J. W., Vallew, L. A., Filene, J. H., & Boyle, C. L. (2008). Ameta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 567–589.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9
  • Keilty, B. (2008). Early intervention home visiting principles in practice: A reflectiveapproach. Young Exceptional Children, 11, 29–40. Kumpfer, K. L., Whiteside, H. O., Greene, J. A., & Allen, K. C. (2010). Effective-ness outcomes of four age versions of the Strengthening Families Program instatewide field sites. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 211–229.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020602
  • Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessmentof client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation andProgram Planning, 2, 197–207.
  • Lieberman, A. F., Weston, D. R., & Pawl, J. H. (1991). Preventative interventionand outcome with anxiously attached dyads. Child Development, 62, 199–209.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130715
  • Lowell, D. I., Carter, A. S., Godoy, L., Paulicin, B., & Briggs-Gowan, M. J. (2011). Arandomized controlled trial of child first: A comprehensive home-based inter-vention translating research into early childhood practice. Child Development,82, 193–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01550.x
  • Luborsky, L., & De Rubeis, R. J. (1984). The use of psychotherapy treatment manuals:A small revolution in psychotherapy research style. Clinical Psychology Review,4, 5–14.
  • Macleod, J., & Nelson, C. (2000). Programs for the promotion of family wellness andthe prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse andNeglect, 24, 1127–1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00178-2
  • McCubbin, H., McCubbin, M., & Thompson, E. (1995). Resiliency in ethnic families: Aconceptual model for predicting family adjustment and adaptation. In H. McCub-bin, M. McCubbin, A. Thompson, & J. Fromer (Eds.), Resiliency in ethnic minorityfamilies (Vol. 1) (pp. 3–48). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • National Research Council. (2013). New directions in child abuse and neglect research.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Nix, R. L., Bierman, K. L., & McMahon, R. J. (2009). How attendance andquality of participation affect treatment response to parent manage-ment training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 429–438.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015028
  • Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Piper, W. E. (2003). The effect of group climate on outcome intwo forms of short-term group therapy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, andPractice, 7, 64–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.64
  • Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Jr., Kitzman, H. J., Eckenrode, J. J., Cole, R. E., & Tatelbaum,R. C. (1999). Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: Recent findings.Future of Children: Home Visiting: Recent Program Evaluations, 9(1), 44–65.
  • Prado, G., Pantin, H., Schwartz, S. J., Lupei, N. S., & Szapocznik, J. (2006). Predic-tors of engagement and retention into a parent-centered, ecodevelopmentalHIV preventive intervention for Hispanic adolescents and their families. Journalof Pediatric Psychology, 31, 874–890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsj046
  • Prinz, R., Sanders, M., Shapiro, C., Whitaker, D., & Lutzker, J. (2009). Population-basedprevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P System Population Trial.Prevention Science, 10, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-009-0123-3
  • Reid, J. B., Kavanagh, K., & Baldwin, D. V. (1987). Abusive parents’ perceptions ofchild problem behaviors: An example of parental bias. Journal of Abnormal ChildPsychology, 15, 457–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00916461
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Byrne, S., & Álvarez, M. (2012). Preventing child maltreat-ment through parenting programmes implemented at the local socialservices level. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 89–103.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.607340
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Byrne, S., & Álvarez, M. (in press). Interventions to promote positive-parenting in Spain. In M. Israelashvili, & J. Romano (Eds.), Cambridge handbookofinternational prevention science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Correa, A. D., Máiquez, M. L., Martín, J. C., & Rodríguez, G. (2006).Family preservation services in Canary Islands: Predictors of the efficacy of aParenting program for families at-risk of social exclusion. European Psychologist,11, 57–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.11.1.57
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Màiquez, M. L., Martín, J. C., & Byrne, S. (2008). Preservación familiar.Un enfoque positivo para la intervención con familias. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Roggman, L. A., Boyce, L. K., Cook, G. A., & Jump, V. K. (2001). Inside home visits: Acollaborative look at process and quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16,53–71.
  • Sampers, J., Anderson, K. G., Hartung, C. M., & Scambler, D. J. (2001). Parent trainingprograms for young children with behavior problems. Infant Toddler Intervention,11, 91–110.
  • Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C., Tully, L. A., & Bor, W. (2000). The triple P-positiveparenting program: A comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directedbehavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset con-duct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 624–640.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.624
  • Sandler, I., Schoenfelder, E., Wolchik, S., & MacKinnon, D. (2011). Long-term impactof prevention programs to promote effective parenting: Lasting effects butuncertain processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131619
  • Shahar, G. (2001). Maternal personality and distress as predictors of childneglect. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 537–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2330
  • Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: Thescience of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National AcademiesPress.
  • Silovsky, J. F., Bard, D., Chaffin, M., Hecht, D., Burris, L., Owora, A., et al. (2011). Preven-tion of child maltreatment in high-risk rural families: A randomized clinical trialwith child welfare outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1435–1444.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.023
  • Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2013). Indirect effects offidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhoodproblem behaviors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 962–974.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033950
  • Spoth, R., Goldberg, C., & Redmond, C. (1999). Engaging families in longitudinal pre-ventive intervention research: Discrete-time survival analysis of socioeconomicand social-emotional risk factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,67, 157–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.1.157
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston,MA: Pearson Education.
  • Tolan, P. H., Hanish, L. D., McKay, M. M., & Dickey, M. H. (2002). Evaluating process inchild and family interventions: Aggression prevention as an example. Journal ofFamily Psychology, 16, 220–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.2.220
  • Vimpani, G. (2000). Editorial comment: Home visiting vulnerable infants in Aus-tralia. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 36, 537–539.
  • Vittrup, B., Holden, G. W., & Buck, J. (2006). Attitudes predict the use of physicalpunishment: A prospective study of the emergence of disciplinary practices.Pediatrics, 117, 2055–2064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds. 2005-2204
  • Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, J. (2010). Adapting the Incredible Years, an evidence-based parenting programme, for families involved in the child welfare system.Journal of Children’s Services, 5, 25–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5042/jcs.2010.0115
  • Woods, J., Kashinath, S., & Goldstein, H. (2004). Effects of embedding caregiver-implemented teaching strategies in daily routines on children’s communicationoutcomes. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 175–193.