Do they feel the same as us?The infrahumanization of individuals with Down syndrome

  1. Verónica Betancor Rodríguez 1
  2. Eva Ariño Mateo 1
  3. Armando Rodríguez-Pérez 1
  4. Naira Delgado Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna (España)
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 28

Issue: 3

Pages: 311-317

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Background: Research on infrahumanization shows there is a strong tendency to deprive outgroups of the ability to experience secondary emotions when compared to ingroups. However, it is not known whether this tendency is also applied to social groups towards which ambivalent attitudes are held, such as individuals with Down syndrome. Methods: In the first study, participants were asked to attribute primary and secondary emotions to members of the ingroup (students) and outgroup (individuals with Down syndrome). The second study explored the effect of the physical features of Down syndrome on the differential association of emotions. A lexical decision task preceded by photographs of three face types (adults with Down syndrome, adults with ambiguous faces and adults without Down syndrome) was used for that purpose. Results: The results showed a higher attribution of secondary emotions to members of the ingroup than to members of the outgroup. Also revealed that participants associated secondary emotions with the faces of adults without Down syndrome and with ambiguous faces far more quickly than with faces of individuals with Down syndrome. Conclusions: These results confirm the existence of infrahumanization bias and the effect of visibility of the stigma in this subtle type of prejudice.

Bibliographic References

  • Ahn, W. K., Flanagan, E. H., Marsh, J. K., & Sanislow, C. A. (2006). Beliefs about essences and the reality of mental disorders. Psychological Science, 17(9), 759-766.
  • Algarabel, S. (1996). Índices de interés psicolingüístico de 1.917 palabras castellanas [Psycholinguistic interest rates of 1.917 Spanish words]. Cognitiva, 8, 43-88.
  • Capozza, D., Boccato, G., Andrighetto, L., & Falvo, R. (2009). Categorization of ambiguous human/ape faces: Protection of ingroup but not outgroup humanity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 777-787.
  • Carnaghi, A., Maass, A. (2007). In-group and Out-group perspectives in the use of derogatory group label: gay vs. fag. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 142-156.
  • Demoulin, S., Rodríguez-Torres, R., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Vaes, J., Paladino, P., Gaunt, R., Cortés, B., & Leyens, J. P. (2004). Emotional Prejudice Can Lead To Infra-Humanization. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 259-296.
  • Enea-Drapeau, C., Carlier, M., & Huguet, P. (2012). Tracking Subtle Stereotypes of Children with Trisomy 21: From Facial-Feature-Based to Implicit Stereotyping. PLOS ONE, 7(4), e34369.
  • Enea-Drapeau, C., Huguet, P., & Carlier, M. (2014). Misleading facebased judgment of cognitive level in intellectual disability: The case of trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome). Research in Developmental Disabilities 35, 3598-3605.
  • Falvo, R., Capozza, D., Hichy, Z., & Di Sipio, A. (2014). Imagined contact favors humanization of individuals with intellectual disabilities: A two wave study. Life Span and Disability, 17, 39-57.
  • Gilmore, L., Campbell, J., & Cuskelly, M. (2003). Developmental expectations, personality stereotypes, and attitudes towards inclusive education: Community and teacher views of Down syndrome. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50, 65-76.
  • Haslam, N. (2011). Genetic Essentialism, Neuroessentialism, and Stigma: Commentary on Dar-Nimrod and Heine (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 819-824.
  • Haslam, N., & Ernst, D. (2002). Essentialist beliefs about mental disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 628-644.
  • Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399-423.
  • Leyens, J. Ph., Paladino, P., Rodríguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodríguez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197.
  • Leyens, J. Ph., Cortés, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J., Fiske., Gaunt, R. Paladino, P., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Rodríguez-Torres, R., & Vaes, J. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 703-717.
  • Loeches, A., Iglesias, J., & Carvajal, F. (1991). Psicobiología del síndrome de Down [Psychobiology of Down syndrome]. Estudios de Psicología, 46, 107-128.
  • Molina, J., Nunes, M., & Vallejo, M. (2012). La percepción social hacia las personas con síndrome de Down: la escala EPSD-1 [The social perception towards people with Down syndrome: EPSD-1 scale]. Educaçao e Pesquisa, 38, 949-964.
  • Rodríguez-Pérez, A., Betancor-Rodríguez, V., Ariño-Mateo, E., Demoulin, S., & Leyens, J. (2014). Normative data for 148 Spanish emotional words in terms of attributions of humanity. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1137-1145
  • Sirlopú, D., González, R., Bohner, G., Siebler, F., Millar, A., Ordóñez, G., Torres, D., & De Tezanos-Pinto, P. (2012). Actitudes implícitas y explícitas hacia personas con síndrome de Down: un estudio en colegios con y sin programas de integración de Chile [Implicit and explicit attitudes toward people with Down syndrome: A study in schools with and without integration programmes in Chile]. Revista de Psicología Social, 27, 199-210.
  • Slovenko, R. (2001). The stigma of psychiatric discourse. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 5-30.
  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Data source: Dialnet