Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal Supremo 856/2017, de 17 de mayo. La exclusión de evaluación ambiental del dique de San Andrés

  1. Ángel Lobo Rodrigo
Journal:
Anales de la Facultad de Derecho

ISSN: 0075-773X

Year of publication: 2017

Issue: 34

Pages: 55-66

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25145/J.ANFADE.2017.34.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRIULL editor

More publications in: Anales de la Facultad de Derecho

Abstract

The environmental impact assessment (EIA) of projects has been an important goal that has been achieved with great effort. However it has been understood that a number of projects should be excluded from this environmental technic, for instance repair works on infrastructures damaged as a result of catastrophic events, emergency works, national defense or civil protection projects or activities, etc. The Supreme Court decision commented in this research could be the path for a non-restrictive interpretation of the environmental exclusion cases that could endanger the application of the institution of the environmental impact assessment.