Differences in Mechanisms of Social Interaction of Gifted Children Based on Peer Acceptance

Referencias bibliográficas

• Almeida, L. S., Araújo, A. M., Sainz-Gómez, M., & Prieto, D. (2016). Challenges in the Identification of Giftedness: Issues Related to Psychological Assessment. Anales de Psicología, 32(3), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259311
• Anguera, M. T. (1990). Metodología Observacional. [Observational Methodology] In J., Arnau, M. T. Anguera, & J. Gómez Benito. Metodología de la investigación en ciencias del comportamiento [Methodology of Behavior Sciences Research] (pp. 125–236). Murcia, Spain: Universidad de Murcia.
• Anguera, M. T., Blanco, A., & Losada, J. L. (2001). Diseños observacionales, cuestión clave en el proceso de la metodología observacional. [Observational Desgins, Key Question in Observational Methodology]. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 3(2), 135–160.
• Anguera, M. T. & Hernández-Mendo, A. (2013). La metodología observacional en el ámbito del deporte. [Observational Methodology in Sport Field]. Revista de Ciencias del Deporte, 9(3), 135–160.
• Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. M. (1989). Observación de la interacción: introducción al análisis secuencial. [Observation of Interaction: Sequential Analysis Introduction]. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Morata, S.A
• Bakeman R. & Quera V. (1995). Analyzing Interaction. Sequential Analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Bakeman, R. & Quera, V. (1996). Análisis de la interacción: Análisis secuencial con SDIS y GSEQ. [Analyzing interaction: Sequential Analysis with SDIS and GSEQ]. Madrid, Spain: Ra-Ma.
• Behar, J. & Riba, C. (1993). Sesgos del observador y de la observación. [Observer and Observation Bias]. In M.T. Anguera (Ed.), Metodología observacional en la investigación psicológica (Vol.2, Fundamentación [Observational Methodology in the Psychological Research]. (pp. 11–148). Barcelona, Spain: PPU.
• Blanco-Villaseñor, A. (1991). La teoría de la generalizabilidad aplicada a diseños observacionales [The Generalizability Theory Applied to Observational Designs]. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 17(3), 23–63. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v 17.i3.23338
• Bokkina, E. I. (2016). Social Interaction of the Gifted Children in a Heterogeneous Environment. (Master’s Thesis). Nihmegen: Radboud University.
• Borges, A. & Hernández-Jorge, C. (2006). La superdotación intelectual: algo más que un privilegio. [Intellectual Giftedness: Something more Tan a Privilege]. Acta Científica y Tecnológica, 10, 28–33.
• Borges, A., Hernández-Jorge, C., & Rodríguez-Naveiras, E. (2011). Evidencias contra el mito de la inadaptación de las personas con altas capacidades intelectuales. [Evidences against the Maladjustment Myth of High Ability People]. Psicothema, 23(3), 362–367.
• Briesch, A. M., Swaminathan, H., Welsh, M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2014). Generalizability Theory: A Practical Guide to Study Design, Implementation and Interpretation. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.00 8
• Cadenas, M. & Borges, Á. (2016). Procedimientos e instrumentos de evaluación para el estudio de la interacción social. Análisis de la interacción en aula [Procedures and Assessment Tools for the Study of Social Interaction. Analysis of Interaction in the Classroom]. Saarbrücken: eae-Editorial Académica Española.
• Cadenas, M. & Borges, A. (2017). The Assessment of Change in Social Interaction through Observation. Acción Psicológica, 14(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.14.1
• Cadenas, M., Borges, A., & Falcón, C. (2013). Análisis y depuración de un instrumento para la observación de la interacción dentro del aula [Analysis and Refinement of an Instrument for Observation of Interaction inside the Classroom]. Revista de Investigación y Divulgación en Psicología y Logopedia, 3(2),18–23.
• Cadenas, M., Rodríguez, M., & Díaz, M. (2012). Los equipos de entrenamiento: una muestra para el estudio de los sesgos en la fiabilidad entre parejas de observadores [The Training Teams: A Sample for the Study of Bias between Pairs of Observers]. Revista de Investigación y Divulgación en Psicología y Logopedia, 2(2), 41–46.
• Cairns, R. B. (1979). The analysis of Social Interactions: Methods, Issues, and Illustrations. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Calero, M. D., García-Martin, B. M., & Robles, M. A. (2011). Learning potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2010.11.025
• Castellano, J., Hernández-Mendo, A., Gómez, P., Fontetxa, E., & Bueno, I. (2000). Sistema de codificación y análisis de la calidad del dato en el fútbol de rendimiento [System of coding and analysis of the data’s quality in performance football]Psicothema, 12(4), 319–333.
• Cavilla, D. (2017). Observation and Analysis of Three Gifted Underachievers in an Underserved, Urban High School Setting. Gifted Education International, 33(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0261429414568181
• Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2012). Motivation and Gifted Students: Implications of Theory and Research. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 622–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21628
• Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
• Coleman, L. J. (2014a). The Power of Specialized Educational Environments in the Development of Giftedness: The Need for Research on Social Context. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214521520
• Coleman, L. (2014b). The Cognitive Map of a Master Teacher Conducting Discussions With Gifted Students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214 521493
• Coleman, L. & Cross, T. (2000). Socio-Emotional Development and the Personal Experience of Giftedness. En, K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, y R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 203–213). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
• Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Nueva York, NY: Wiley.
• De Jonge, M. (2016). Social interaction in enrichment classes: differences between popular and rejected gifted children (Master’s Thesis). Radboud University, Nijmegen.
• Flores, N. & Santoyo, C. (2009). Estabilidad y cambio de las relaciones sociales entre niños: análisis de mecanismos funcionales [Stability and Change of Social Relationships in Children: Functional Mechanisms Analysis]. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de Conducta, 3(1), 59–74.
• Gabín, B., Camerino, O., Anguera, M. T., & Castañer, M. (2012). Lince: Multiplatform Sport Analysis Software. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4692– 4694.
• Gagné, F. (2015). Academic Talent Development Programs: A Best Practices Model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 281–295. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s12564-015-9366-9
• Graffam, B. (2006). A Case Study of Teachers of Gifted Learners: Moving From Prescribed Practice to Described Practitioners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 119–131.
• Hernández-Mendo, A., Ramos-Pérez, F., & Pastrana, J. L. (2012). SAGT: Programa informático para análisis de Teoría de la Generalizabilidad [SAGT: Computer Program for Generalizability Theory analysis]. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain: Safe Creative.
• Hoogeveen, L., van Hell, J. G., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Social-emotional Characteristics of Gifted Accelerated and Non-Accelerated Students in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 2044-8279.2011.02047.x
• Jen, E., Gentry, M., & Moon, S. M. (2017). High-Ability Students’ Perspectives on an Affective Curriculum in a Diverse University-Based Summer Residential Enrichment Program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169861 7722839
• Lee, S., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Thomson, D. (2012). Academically Gifted Students' Perceived Interpersonal Competence and Peer Relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0016986212442568
• Little, C. A. (2012). Curriculum as Motivation for Gifted Students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 695– 705. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21621
• Lloyd, B. P., Kennedy, C. H., & Yoder, P. J. (2013). Quantifying Contingent Relations from Direct Observation Data: Transitional Probability Comparison versus Yule’s Q. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(2), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jaba.45
• López, V. & Sotillo, M. (2009). Giftedness and Social Adjustment: Evidence Supporting the Resilience Approach in Spanish-Speaking Children and Adolescents. High Ability Studies, 20, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130902860739
• McCoach, B., Rambo, K. E., & Welsh, M. (2013). Assessing the Growth of the Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0016986212463873
• Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of Effective Teachers of Gifted Students: Teacher Background and Personality Styles of Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986 20304700404
• Neihart, M. (2007). The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862073063 19
• Netz, H. (2014). Gifted Conversations: Discursive Patterns in Gifted Classes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862 14523312
• Plucker, J. A. & Callahan, C. M. (2014). Research on Giftedness and Gifted Education: Status of the Field and Considerations for the Future. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0014402914527244
• Reis, S. & Renzulli, J. (2010). Is there is Still a Need for Gifted Education? An Examination of Current Research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009. 10.012
• Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (2003). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: Developing Creative and Productive Giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 184– 203). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Robinson, N. M. (2008). The Social World of Gifted Children and Youth. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness in Children: Psychoeducational Theory, Research, and Best Practices (pp. 33–51). New York, NY: Springer.
• Rodríguez, A. & Morera, M. D. (2001). El sociograma: estudio de las relaciones informales en las organizaciones [The Sociogram: Informal Relationships Study in Organizations]. Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.
• Rodríguez-Dorta, M. & Borges, A. (2016). Optimización y eficiencia en el análisis de datos en metodología observacional [Data Analysis Optimization and Efficiency in Observational Methodology]. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada, 21(1), 1–15.
• Rodríguez-Dorta, M. & Borges, A. (2017). Behavioral Patterns in Special Education. Good Teaching Practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(631), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00631
• Rodríguez-Naveiras, E. (2011). PROFUNDO: Un instrumento para la evaluación de proceso de un programa de altas capacidades [PROFUNDO: An Instrument for Process Assessment of a High Ability Program]. (Doctoral Thesis), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna.
• Santoyo, C. (1994a). Contexto e interacción social: bases conceptuales y metodológicas [Context and Social Interaction: Conceptual and Methodological Basics]. Barcelona, Spain: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias.
• Santoyo, C. (1994b). Sociometría conductual: el diseño de mapas socioconductuales. [Behavioral Sociometry: The Design of Sociobehavioral Maps]. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de Conducta, 20(2), 183– 205.
• Santoyo, C. (1996). Behavioral Assessment of Social Interactions in Natural Settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 124–131.
• Santoyo, C. (2006). La ecología social de la cotidianeidad en la escuela: Redes sociales y mecanismos funcionales [Social Ecology of Everyday Nature at School: Social Networks and Functional Mechanisms]. In C. Santoyo y C. Espinosa (Eds.), Desarrollo e interacción social: Teoría y métodos de investigación en contexto [Development and Social Interaction: Theory and Researching Methods in Context] (pp.113–150). México: UNAM/ CONACyT.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Patterns of Giftedness: A Triarchic Analysis. Roeper Review, 22, 231–235.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Assessment of Gifted Students for Identification Purposes: New techniques for a new Millennium. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.003
• Stoeger, H. & Ziegler, A. (2010). Do Pupils with Differing Cognitive Abilities Benefit Similarly from a SelfRegulated Learning Training Program? Gifted Education International, 26, 110– 123. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941002600113
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrel, F. C. (2011). Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1529100611418056
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A Psychosocial Approach. In R. J. Sternberg y J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp.21–52). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2009). Affective Curriculum and Instruction for Gifted Learners. In J. VanTasselBaska, T. L. Cross, & F. R. Olenchak (Ed.), SocialEmotional Curriculum, with Gifted and Talented Students (pp. 113–132). Texas: Prufrock Press.
• Volpe, R. J., Briesch, A. M., & Gadow, K. D. (2011). The Efficiency of Behavior Rating Scales to Assess Inattentive-Overactive and Oppositional-Defiant Behaviors: Applying Generalizability Theory to Streamline Assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 49,131–155.
• Westberg, K., Archambault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). The Classroom Practices Observation Study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(2), 120–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 016235329301600204
• Ziegler, A. & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Towards a Systemic Theory of Gifted Education. High Ability Studies, 23(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13598139.2012.679085