Bases teóricas que guían a la psicología de la conservación ambiental

Bibliographic References

• Aguilar-Luzón, M. C., García, J.M.A., Calvo-Salguero, A. y Salinas, J. M. (2012). Comparative study between the theory of planned behaviour and the value-belief-norm model regarding the environment on Spanish housewives’ recycling behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2797-2833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00962.x
• Ajzen, I. y Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to action: A theory of planned behavior. En J. Kuhl y J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
• Ajzen, I. y Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
• Akintunde, E. (2017). Theories and Concepts for Human Behavior in Environmental Preservation. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health, 1, 120-133. doi: 10.26502/jesph.96120012
• Aragonés, J.I. y Amérigo, M. (2010). Psicología Ambiental. Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos. En J.I. Aragonés y M. Amérigo (Eds.), Psicología Ambiental, 3ª. Ed. Madrid: Editorial Pirámide.
• Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., y Akert, R.M. (2010). Social Psychology. 7th Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall,.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84, 191-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
• Barker, R. (1968). Ecological Psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. y Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
• Bechtel, R. B., Corral Verdugo, V., y de Queiroz Pinheiro, J. (1999). Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 122128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030001008
• Berenguer, J. y Martín, R. (2003). Una aproximación al concepto de actitud ambiental. En C. San Juan, J. Berenguer, J.A. Corraliza e I. Olaizola (Eds.). Medio ambiente y participación, una perspectiva desde la Psicología Ambiental y el derecho. (pp. 55-64) Bilbao: Servicio editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.
• Calvo-Salguero, A., Aguilar-Luzón, M.C., Salinas, J. M., y García, J. M. A. (2014). Gender, masculinity and femininity as ecocentrism and anthropocentrism predictors. Psyecology, 5, 284-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2014.942509
• Castro, P., y Lima, M. L. (2001). Old and new ideas about the environment and science: An exploratory study. Environment and Behavior , 33 , 400-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973052
• Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L. J., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K., y Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Inf luence, 1, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510500181459
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., y Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Ppsychology, 58, 1015-1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
• Clayton, S., y Myers, G. (2015). Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. 2nd Edition. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Clayton, S. y Sanders, C. (2012). Introduction. Environmental and conservation psychology. En S. Clayton (ed.), Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Cone, J. y Hayes, S. (1980). Environmental problems; Behavioral solutions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Corraliza, J. A. y Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental values, beliefs and actions: A situational approach. Environment and Behavior , 32 , 832-848. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972829
• Corral-Verdugo, V., y Armendariz, L. I. (2000). The “new environmental paradigm” in a Mexican community. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598642
• Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G., y Sinha, J. B. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: Toward a new human interdependence paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40, 703-725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507308786
• Corral-Verdugo, V., Frías, M., y García, C. (2010). Introduction to the psychological dimensions of sustainability. En V. Corral, C. García, y M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
• Durán, M., Ferraces, M. J., Rodríguez, M., y Sabucedo, J. M. (2016). The role of anticipated emotions in recycling intention: An extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Psyecology, 7, 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1114215
• Dunlap, R. E. y Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. A proposed measuring and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. y Jones, R.E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
• Fiala, N. (2008). Meeting the demand: An estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production. Ecological Economics, 67, 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.021
• Fishbein, M. y Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory research. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
• Geller, E.S., Abrahamse, W., Guan, B., y Sussman, R. (2016). Applying behavioral science for environmental sustainability. En R. Gifford (Ed), Research methods for environmental psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
• Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
• Heft, H. (2012). The foundations of ecological psychology. En S. Clayton (ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 1-40). Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
• Hernández, B., Martín, A. M., Ruiz, C., y Hidalgo, M. (2010). The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws. Journal of Env i ronmenta l Psychology, 30 , 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.009
• Hernández, B., Suárez, E., Martínez-Torvisco, J., y Hess, S. (2000). The study of environmental beliefs by facet analysis: Research in the Canary Islands, Spain. Environment and Behavior, 32(5), 612-636. DOI: 10.1177/00139160021972702
• Hernández, B., Tabernero, C., y Suárez, E. (2010). Psychosocial motivations and self-regulation processes that activate cnvironmentally responsible behavior. En J. Valentín, y L. Gámez (Eds.), Environmental Psychology: New Developments (pp. 109-126). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Incheon, Corea: IPCC.
• Jakovcevic, A., y Reyna, C. (2016). Explaining energy efficiency behaviours among Argentinean citizens through the VBN model. Psyecology, 7, 282-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2016.1238588
• Kaaronen, R. (2017). Affording sustainability: Adopting a theory of affordances as a guiding heuristic for environmental policy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. 1974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01974.
• Lehman, P. H., y Geller, E. S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 13-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i1.33
• Lima, M. L., y Branco, C. (2018). Recycling for my neighbourhood? Using place identity and social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviour. Psyecology, 9, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2017.1412574
• Maki, A., y Rothman, A.J. (2017). Understanding proenvironmental intentions and behaviors: The importance of considering both the behavior setting and the type of behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 157, 517-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1215968
• Martín, A. M., Hernández, B., Frías�Armenta, M., y Hess, S. (2014). Why ordinary people comply with environmental laws: A structural model on normative and attitudinal determinants of illegal anti�ecological behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 80-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02062.x
• Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., Oliveira, R. y Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15623-15628. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604475103
• Muiños, G., Suárez, E., Hess, S., y Hernández, B. (2015). Frugality and psychological wellbeing. The role of voluntary restriction and the resourceful use of resources. Psyecology, 6, 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1026083
• Oom do Valle, P., Rebelo, E., Reis, E. y Menezes, J. (2005). Combining behavioral theories to predict recycling involvement. Environment and Behavior, 37, 364-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504272563
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. y Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research, a constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511
• Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., y Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5328.918
• Schwartz, S. H. (1968) Words, deeds and perception of consequences and responsibility in action situations. Journal of Personali ty and Social Psychology, 10, 232-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0026569
• Sexton, S. y Sexton, A. (2011). Conspicuous conservation: the Prius effect and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67, 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.11.004
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: The Macmillan Company.
• Stern, P. C. (1992). What Psychology knows about energy conservation. American Psychologist, 47, 1124-1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.10.1224
• Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
• Suárez, E., y Hernández, B. (2008). La consistencia entre los valores, las actitudes y el comportamiento. Notas desde la Psicología Ambiental. En J. Riechmann (Coord.) ¿En qué estamos fallando?: cambio social para ecologizar el mundo. (pp. 129-161). Barcelona: Icaria Editorial
• Tabernero, C., y Hernández, B. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43, 658-675. doi: 10.1177/0013916510379759
• Tabernero, C., Hernández, B., Cuadrado, E., Luque, B., y Pereira, C. R. (2015). A multilevel perspective to explain recycling behaviour in communities. Journal of Environmenta l Management , 159 , 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.024
• Tapia, C., Corral, V., Fraijo, B., y Durón, F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: a measure of proecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5, 711-723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711
• Thompson, S. C. G., y Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9
• Tybur, J. y Griskevicius, V. (2013). Evolutionary Psychology: A fresh perspective for understanding and changing problematic behavior. Public Administration Review, 73, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12003
• Zaki, J. y Mitchell, J.P. (2011). Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 108, 19761– 19766. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112324108