Los objetos verbales de persona como variantes de tratamiento interpersonal canario en la red social Facebook

  1. María José Serrano
Revista:
Revista española de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 0213-2028

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 32

Número: 1

Páginas: 329-355

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1075/RESLA.16016.SER DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de lingüística aplicada

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ASUNCIÓN, T. Z. S. & QUEROL, M. B. (2013) RHETORICAL MOVES IN THE INTRODUCTIONS OF MASTERS’ THESES. GRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 6(1–2), 65–85.
  • BADLEY, G. (2009) ACADEMIC WRITING AS SHAPING AND RESHAPING. TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 14(2), 209–219. 10.1080/13562510902757294
  • BASTURKMEN, H. (2009) COMMENTING ON RESULTS IN PUBLISHED RESEARCH ARTICLES AND MASTERS DISSERTATIONS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 8, 241–251. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2009.07.001
  • BASTURKMEN, H. (2012) A GENRE-BASED INVESTIGATION OF DISCUSSION SECTIONS OF RESEARCH ARTICLES IN DENTISTRY AND DISCIPLINARY VARIATION. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 11(2), 134–144. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2011.10.004
  • BHATIA, V. K. (2004) WORLDS OF WRITTEN DISCOURSE. LONDON: CONTINUUM.
  • BITCHENER, J. & BASTURKMEN, H. (2006) PERCEPTIONS OF THE DIFFICULTIES OF POSTGRADUATE L2 THESIS STUDENTS WRITING THE DISCUSSION SECTION. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 5, 4–18. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2005.10.002
  • BUNTON, D. (2002) GENERIC MOVES IN PHD THESIS INTRODUCTIONS. IN J. FLOWERDEW (ED.), ACADEMIC DISCOURSE (PP.57–75). LONDON: LONGMAN.
  • BUNTON, D. (2005) THE STRUCTURE OF PHD CONCLUSION CHAPTERS. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 4, 207–224. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2005.03.004
  • COTOS, E. (2014) GENRE-BASED AUTOMATED WRITING EVALUATION FOR L2 RESEARCH WRITING: FROM DESIGN TO EVALUATION AND ENHANCEMENT. NEW YORK: PALGRAVE MCMILLAN. 10.1057/9781137333377
  • CUMMING, A. , LAI, C. & CHO, H. (2016) STUDENTS’ WRITING FROM SOURCES FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES: A SYNTHESIS OF RECENT RESEARCH. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 23, 47–58. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2016.06.002
  • DEWEY, J. (1997) (1910) HOW WE THINK. MINEOLA, NEW YORK: DOVER PUBLICATIONS INC. (ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN 1910 BYDC HEATH AND CO, PUBLISHERS: BOSTON).
  • DUDLEY-EVANS, T. (1986) GENRE ANALYSIS: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE INTRODUCTION AND DISCUSSION SECTIONS OF MSC DISSERTATIONS. IN M. COULTHARD (ED.), TALKING ABOUT TEXT. DISCOURSE ANALYSIS MONOGRAPHS13 (PP.219–228). ENGLISH LANGUAGE RESEARCH: UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
  • GENG, Y. & WARTON, S. (2016) EVALUATIVE LANGUAGE IN DISCUSSION SECTIONS OF DOCTORAL THESES: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN L1 CHINESE AND L1 ENGLISH WRITERS. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 22, 80–91. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2016.01.001
  • HOLMES, R. (1997) GENRE ANALYSIS AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: AN INVESTIGATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSION SECTIONS IN THREE DISCIPLINES. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 16(4), 321–337. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00038‑5
  • HOLMES, R. (2001) VARIATION AND TEXT STRUCTURE: THE DISCUSSION SECTION IN ECONOMICS RESEARCH ARTICLES. ITL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 131–132, 107–135. 10.1075/ITL.131‑132.06HOL
  • JOHNS, A. M. (2001) AN INTERDISCIPLINARY, INTERINSTITUTIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES PROGRAM: STUDENT INVOLVEMENT AND STUDENT SUCCESS. IN I. LEKI (ED.), ACADEMIC WRITING PROGRAMS: CASE STUDIES IN TESOL PRACTICE (PP.61–72). ALEXANDRIA, VA: TESOL.
  • JOHNS, A. M. (2002) DESTABILIZING AND ENRICHING NOVICE STUDENTS’ GENRE THEORIES. IN A. M. JOHNS (ED.), GENRE IN THE CLASSROOM: MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES (PP.237–348). MAHWAH, NJ: LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES.
  • JOHNS, A. M. & SWALES, J. M. (2002) LITERACY AND DISCIPLINARY PRACTICES: OPENING AND CLOSING PERSPECTIVES. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 1, 13–28. 10.1016/S1475‑1585(02)00003‑6
  • KUTEEVA, M. & NEGRETTI, R. (2016) GRADUATE STUDENTS’ GENRE KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEIVED DISCIPLINARY PRACTICES: CREATING A RESEARCH SPACE ACROSS DISCIPLINES. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 41, 36–49. 10.1016/J.ESP.2015.08.004
  • KWAN, B. (2006) THE SCHEMATIC STRUCTURE OF LITERATURE REVIEWS IN DOCTORAL THESES OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 25, 30–55. 10.1016/J.ESP.2005.06.001
  • LEWKOWICZ, J. (2009) CONCLUDING YOUR MASTER’S LEVEL THESIS. REVISTA CANARIA DE ESTUDIOS INGLESES, 59, 63–72.
  • LEWKOWICZ, J. (2012) THE CHALLENGES OF WRITING A SUCCESSFUL THESIS CONCLUSION. IN R. TANG (ED.), ACADEMIC WRITING IN A SECOND OR FOREIGN LANGUAGE (PP.107–125). LONDON: CONTINUUM INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING GROUP.
  • LIM, J. M. H. (2014) FORMULATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS ON APPLIED LINGUISTICS. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 35, 66–88. 10.1016/J.ESP.2014.02.003
  • LIM, J. M. H. , LOI, C. K. & HASHIM, A. (2014) POSTULATING HYPOTHESES IN EXPERIMENTAL DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS ON APPLIED LINGUISTICS: A QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION INTO RHETORICAL SHIFTS AND LINGUISTIC MECHANISMS. IBÉRICA, 27, 121–142.
  • LIM, J. M. H. , LOI, C. K. , HASHIM, A. & LIU, M. S. M. (2015) PURPOSE STATEMENTS IN EXPERIMENTAL DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS SUBMITTED TO U.S. UNIVERSITIES: AN INQUIRY INTO DOCTORAL STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATIVE RESOURCES IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 20, 69–89. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2015.06.002
  • LINDEBERG, A. (1994) RHETORICAL CONVENTIONS IN THE DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION SECTIONS OF RESEARCH ARTICLES IN FINANCE, MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING. IN M. BREKKE , O. ANDERSON , T. DAHL & J. MYKING (EDS.), APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF CURRENT LSP RESEARCH. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN LSP SYMPOSIUM (PP.761–779). BERGEN, NORWAY: FAGBOKFORLAGET.
  • PALTRIDGE, B. (2002) THESIS AND DISSERTATION WRITING: AN EXAMINATION OF PUBLISHED ADVICE AND ACTUAL PRACTICE. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 21, 125–143. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00025‑9
  • PALTRIDGE, B. , STARFIELD, S. , RAVELLI, L. J. & TUCKWELL, K. (2012) CHANGE AND STABILITY: EXAMINING THE MACROSTRUCTURES OF DOCTORAL THESES IN THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 11, 332–344. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2012.08.003
  • PALTRIDGE, B. & WOODROW, L. (2012) THESIS AND DISSERTATION WRITING: MOVING BEYOND THE TEXT. IN R. TANG (ED.), ACADEMIC WRITING IN A SECOND OR FOREIGN LANGUAGE (PP.88–104). LONDON: CONTINUUM INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING GROUP.
  • PARKINSON, J. (2011) THE DISCUSSION SECTION AS ARGUMENT: THE LANGUAGE USED TO PROVE KNOWLEDGE CLAIMS. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 30, 164–175. 10.1016/J.ESP.2011.03.001
  • PEACOCK, M. (2002) COMMUNICATIVE MOVES IN THE DISCUSSION SECTION OF RESEARCH ARTICLES. SYSTEM, 30, 479–497. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(02)00050‑7
  • PENG, J. (1987) ORGANIZATIONAL FEATURES IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH ARTICLES. ELR JOURNAL, 1, 79–116.
  • POSTEGUILLO, S. (1999) THE SCHEMATIC STRUCTURE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE RESEARCH ARTICLES. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 18(2), 139–160. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00001‑5
  • RIDLEY, D. (2012) (2008) THE LITERATURE REVIEW. A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR STUDENTS. SECOND EDITION. LONDON: SAGE PUBLICATIONS.
  • SAMRAJ, B. (2008) A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF MASTER’S THESES ACROSS DISCIPLINES WITH A FOCUS ON INTRODUCTIONS. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 7(1), 55–67. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2008.02.005
  • SOLER-MONREAL, C. (2015) ANNOUNCING ONE’S WORK IN PHD THESES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE: A COMPARISON OF MOVE 3 IN LITERATURE REVIEWS WRITTEN IN ENGLISH L1, ENGLISH L2 AND SPANISH L1. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 40, 27–41. 10.1016/J.ESP.2015.07.004
  • SOLER-MONREAL, C. (2016) A MOVE-STEP ANALYSIS OF THE CONCLUDING CHAPTERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE PHD THESES. IBÉRICA, 32(FALL), 105–132.
  • SOLER-MONREAL, C. , CARBONELL-OLIVARES, M. & GIL-SALOM, L. (2011) A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF THE RHETORICAL ORGANISATION OF ENGLISH AND SPANISH PHD THESIS INTRODUCTIONS. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 30(1), 4–17. 10.1016/J.ESP.2010.04.005
  • SOLER-MONREAL, C. & GIL-SALOM, L. (2010) MOVES, STEPS AND LINGUISTIC SIGNALS IN RA DISCUSSION SECTIONS. IN W. HAHN & C. VERTAN (EDS.), FACHSPRACHEN IN DER WELTWEITEN KOMMUNIKATION / SPECIALISED LANGUAGE IN GLOBAL COMMUNICATION. PROCEEDINGS OF THE XVITH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON LANGUAGE FOR SPECIAL PURPOSES LSP). SERIES SPRACHE IN DER GESELLSCHAFT, BAND 30 / LANGUAGE IN THE SOCIETY, VOLUME 30 (PP.519–528). BERN: PETER LANG.
  • SWALES, J. M. (2004) RESEARCH GENRES. EXPLORATIONS AND APPLICATIONS. CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  • SWALES, J. M. & FEAK, C. B. (2000) ENGLISH IN TODAY’S RESEARCH WORLD: A WRITING GUIDE. ANN ARBOR, MI: THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRESS. 10.3998/MPUB.9059
  • YANG, R. & ALLISON, D. (2003) RESEARCH ARTICLES IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS: MOVING FROM RESULTS TO CONCLUSIONS. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 22, 365–385. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00026‑1
  • YAYLI, D. (2011) FROM GENRE-AWARENESS TO CROSS-GENRE AWARENESS: A STUDY IN AN EFL CONTEXT. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 10, 121–129. 10.1016/J.JEAP.2011.02.001