Herramientas de cribado para la detección de retrasos o trastornos en el desarrolloUna revisión sistemática de la literatura

  1. Alcantud Marín, Francisco 1
  2. Alonso Esteban, Yurena 1
  3. Rico Bañón, Darío 1
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

Zeitschrift:
Revista Española de Discapacidad (REDIS)

ISSN: 2340-5104

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Titel der Ausgabe: REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE DISCAPACIDAD

Ausgabe: 3

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 7-26

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5569/2340-5104.03.02.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista Española de Discapacidad (REDIS)

Zusammenfassung

The goal of this article is to analyze the quality and applicability screening instruments aimed at detecting developmental delays or disorders. A systematic review of the scientific literature published during the last 25 years (1990-2014) retrieved from different databases is carried out. The study is limited to detection systems based on questionnaires, tests or observation of children`s behavior. The analyzed systems are rated on a scale of quality built “ad hoc”. The results show a high variability of tools and detection systems, many of which are research questionnaires, while others are diagnostic tools used for screening purposes. They can be classified in two large groups of instruments: 1), the ones based on developmental milestones whose temporary failure can mean a delay in the development and 2), those who, assuming the first principle, have identified the milestones that can be precursors of developmental disorders. In the conclusions, recommendations are offered regarding the validation of screening systems in Spain and for the construction of new ones.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • AAP (1994): “Committee on Children with Disabilities. Screening infants and young children for developmental disabilities”. Pediatrics, 93: 863-865.
  • AAP (2001a): “Committee on Children with Disabilities. Developmental surveillance and screening of infants an youn children”. Pediatrics, 108: 192-196.
  • AAP (2001b): Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Committe on children with disabilities. American Academy of Pediatrics.
  • AAP (2006): “Identifying Infants and Young Children With Developmental Disorders in the Medical Home: An Algorithm for Developmental Surveillance and Screening”. Pediatrics, 1: 405-420.
  • Aaronson, N. et al. (2002): “Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria”. Quality of Life Research, 11: 193-202.
  • Alcantud, F. et al. (2015): Sistema de Detección Precoz de Trastornos del Desarrollo (SDPTD): Construcción, validación y manual de uso (Versión 1.0). Madrid: Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad.
  • Alpern, G. (2007): Developmental Profile. Los Angeles California: Western Psychological Services.
  • Arruabarrena, I. y de Paul, J. (2012): “Early Intervention Programs for Children and Families: Theoretical and EMpirical Bases Supporting their Social And Economic Efficiency”. Psychosocial Intervention, 2 (21): 117-127.
  • Artigas-Pallarés, J. (2011): “Trastornos del neurodesarrollo: Conceptos básicos, en Artigas-Pallarés, J. y Narbona, J.: Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo. Barcelona: Viguera Ediciones.
  • Aylward, G. (1997): “Conceptual issues in developmental screening and assessment”. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 18: 340-349.
  • Barnes, K. y Stark, A. (1975): “The Denver Development screening test”. American Journal of Public Health: 363-369.
  • Bayley, N. (2006): Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3rd Edn Screening test Manual. San Antonio Texas: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Bedford, H. et al. (2013): Measures of child development: A review. Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
  • Bliss, S. y Newborg, J. (2007): “Battelle Developmental Inventory Sencon Edition”. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25 (4): 409-415.
  • Bradley-Johnson, S. y Johnson, C. (2001): Cognitive abilities scale (2nd ed). Austin Texas: Pro-Ed.
  • Brigance, A. y Glascoe, F. (2002): Brigance Infant and Toddler Screen, Massachusetts: Hawker Brownlow Education.
  • Brothers, K. et al. (2008): “PEDS: Developmental Milestones- An Accurate Brief Tool for Surveillance and Screening”. Clinical Pediatrics, 47 (3): 271-279.
  • Bryson, S. et al. (2008): “The autism Observation Scale for Infants: Scale development and reliability data”. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 38 (4): 731-738.
  • Camp, B. W. (2006): “What the clinician really needs to know: Questioning the clinical usefulness of sensitivity and specificity in studies of screening test”. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27: 226-230.
  • Coonrod, E. y Stone, W. (2005): “Screening for autism in young children”, en Volkmar, F. et al.: Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cox, A. et al. (1999): “Autism spectrum disorders at 20 and 42 months of age: stability of clinical and ADI-R diagnosis”. Journal of Child Psychology ans Psychiatry ans Allied Disciplines, 40 (5): 719-732.
  • Creighton, D. y Sauve, R. (1988): “The Minnesota Infant Development Inventory in the developmental screening of high-risk infants at 8 months”. Journal of Behavior Sciences, 20: 424-433.
  • Dawson, S. et al. (2000): “Case study of the development of an infant with autism from birth to two years of age”. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21: 299-313.
  • Drotar, D. et al. (2008): Pediatric developmental screening: understanding and selecting instruments. Nueva York: Commonwealth Fund.
  • Easterbrooks, M. y Goldberg, W. (1984): “Toddler development in the family: Impact of father involvement and parenting characteristics”. Child Development, 55 (3): 740-752.
  • Erikson, J. (1996): The Infant-toddler developmental assessment (IDA): A familycentered transdisciplinary assessment process. Washington DC: Zero to Three: The National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families.
  • Fenichel, G. (1988): Clinical pediatric neurology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.
  • Fewell, R. y Langley, M. (1984): DASI-II Developmental activities screening inventory. Austin Texas: Pro-Ed.
  • Filipek, P. et al. (2000): “Practice parameter: screening and diagnosis of autism”. Neurology, 4 (55): 468-479.
  • Frankenburg, W. y Dodds, J. (1967): “The Denver Developmental Screening Test”. The Journal of Pediatrics, 71 (2): 181-191.
  • Frankenburg, W. et al. (1971): “Validity of Denver developmental screening test”. Child Development: 475-485.
  • Frankenburg, W. et al. (1992): “The Denver II: a major revision and restandardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test”. Pediatrics, 89 (1): 91-97.
  • GAT, Federación Estatal de Asociaciones de Profesionales de Atención Temprana (2000): Libro Blanco de Atención Temprana. Madrid: Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad.
  • Glascoe, F. (1997): “Parents’ concerns about children’s development: pre-screening technique or screening test?”. Pediatrics, 99: 522-528.
  • Glascoe, F. (1998): Parent’s Evaluation of Developmental status (PEDS). Nashville: Ellsworth & Vandermeer.
  • Glascoe, F. et al. (1992): “Accuracy of the Denver- II in developmental screening”. Pediatrics, 89 (6): 1221-1225.
  • Gollenberg, A. et al. (2010): “Concurrent validity of the parent-completes Ages and Stages Questionaires. 2nd Ed. with the Bayley Scales of INfant Development II in low-risk sample”. Child: Care, Health & Development, 36 (4): 485-490.
  • Gracy, M. et al. (2010): Developmental and Social-Emotional Screening Instruments for Use in Pediatric Primary Care in Infants and Young Children. Nueva York: Children’s Health Foundation.
  • Greenwood, C. et al. (2005): “Individual growth and development indicators (IGDIs): Tools for assessing intervention results for infants and toddlers”. Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities: 103-124.
  • Halle, T. et al. (2011): Understanding and choosing Assessments and Developmental Screeners for Young Children Ages 3-5: Profiles of Selected Measures, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for CHildren and Families, U.S. Departament of Health and Human Services.
  • Hamilton, S. (2006): “Screening for developmental delay: reliable, easy-to-use tools”. Journal of Family Practice, 55 (5): 415-422.
  • Hardin, B. y Peisner, E. (2001): The Early Learning Accomplishment Profile (E-LAP). Examiner’s manual and Reliability and Validity, Chapel Hill: Training Ourreach Project Inc Kaplan Early Learning Company.
  • Hickson, G. et al. (1983): “Concerns of mothers seeking care in private pediatric offices: Opportunities for expanding services”. Pediatrics, 72: 619-624.
  • Hix-Small, H. et al. (2006): “Impact of implementing Developmental Screening at 12 and 24 months in a Pediatric Practice”. Pediatrics, 2 (120): 381-388.
  • Hresko, W. et al. (1994): Developmental Observation Checklist System. Austin Texas: Pro-Ed.
  • Ireton, H. (1992): Child Development Inventory Manual. Minneapolis: Behavior Science Systems.
  • Ireton, H. (2004): Child Development Review Manual. Minneapolis: Behavior Science Systems.
  • Ireton, H. y Glascoe, F. (1995): “Assessin Children’s Development Using Parent’s Reports: The Child Developmen Inventory”. Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, 34 (5): 248-255.
  • Ireton, H. et al. (1977): “Minnesota Child Development Inventory: Identification of children with developmental disorders”. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2 (1): 18-22.
  • Johnson, C. y Bradley-Johnson, S. (2002): “Construct stability of the cognitive abilities scale for infants and toldders”. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20 (2): 144-151.
  • Johnson, C. y Myers, S. (2007): “Identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders”. Pediatrics, 5 (120).
  • Johnson, S. y Marlow, N. (2006): “Developmental screen or developmental testing?”. Early Human Development, 82: 173-183.
  • Kerstjems, J. et al. (2009): “Support for the global feasibility of the Ages and Stages Questionaire as developmental screener”. Early human development, 85 (7): 443-447.
  • Kleinman, J. et al. (2008): “Diagnostic stability in very young children with Autism Spectrum Disorders”. Journal of Autism And Developmental Disorders, 38: 606-615.
  • Kube, D. et al. (1988): “Classification of Developmental Delays”. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 5 (1): 2-14.
  • Leiarraga, H. et al. (2005): Prueba Nacional de Pesquisa, PRUNAPE, Manual Técnico, Buenos Aires: Fundación Hospital Garran.
  • Lord, C. y Corsello, C. (2005): “Diagnostic instruments in autistic spectrum disorders”, en Volkmar, F. et al.: Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders. Hoboken NJ: John Wikey & Sons.
  • Meisels, J. y Provence, S. (1989): Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and ther families. Washington DC: Bational Center for Clinical Infant Programs.
  • Miler, L. (1993): FirstSTEP: Screening Test for Evaluating Preschoolers. Manual. San Antonio Texas: Pearson.
  • Moodie, S. et al. (2014): Early childhood developmental screening: A compendium of measures for children ages birth to five. Washington: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families. US Departament of Health and Human Services.
  • Muñoz, J. et al. (2006): “Autismo, Identificación e intervención temprana”. Acta de Neurologia Colombiana, 2 (22).
  • Newborg, J. (2005): Battelle Developmental Inventory. 2nd Edition: Examiner’s manual, Itasca IL: Riverside.
  • Pomés, P. (2012): Examination of the Spanish translation of developmental screening instrument, Oregon: University of Oregon.
  • Provence, S. y Apfel, N. (2001): Ifant-Toddler and Family Instrument (ITFI), Paul H Brookes.
  • Reuter, J. y Gruber, C. (2000): Kent Inventory of Developmental Skills. Kent, Ohio: Western Psychological Services.
  • Reuter, J. et al. (1996): Kent Inventory of Developmental Skills (KIDS), Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
  • Ringwalt, S. (2008): Developmental screening and assessment instruments with an emphasis on social and emotional development for young children ages birth through five, Chapel Hill: The University of North: FPG Child Development Institute The National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.
  • Roxswell, S. (1993): FirstSPET: Screening test for evaluating preschoolers, Harcourt Brace Javanovich: Psychological Corporation.
  • Rydz, D. et al. (2006): “Screening for Developmental Delay in the Setting of a Community Pediatric Clinic: A Prospective Assessment of Parent-Report Questionnaires”. Pediatrics, 4 (118).
  • Sheehan, R. (1988): “Involvement of parents in early childhood assessment”, en Wachs T. y Sheehan, R. (Eds): Assessment of young developmentally disabled children, Nueva York: 75-90.
  • Shonkoff, J. et al. (1979): “Primary care approaches to developmental disabilities”. Pediatrics, 4 (64): 506-514.
  • Squires, J. et al. (1997): “Revision of a Parent-Completed Developmental Screening Tool: Ages and Stages Questionaires”. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22 (3): 313-328.
  • Squires, J. et al. (1998): “Parent-completed Developmental questionnarires: Effectiveness with low and middke income parents”. Early Childhood Research Quaterly: 345-353.
  • Terwee, C. et al. (2007): “Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60: 34-42.
  • Vericat, A. y Orden, A. B. (2010): “Herramientas de Screening del Desarrollo Psicomotor en Latinoamérica”. Revista chilena de pediatría, 81 (5): 391-401.
  • Voress, J. y Maddox, T. (1998): Developmental assessment of young children (DAYC-2Ed). Austin Texas: Pro-Ed.