Precisión diagnóstica del pico cepstral de mayor prominencia en el cepstrum suavizado (CPPS) en la detección de la disfonía en español

  1. Jonathan Delgado Hernández
  2. Nieves María León Gómez 1
  3. Alejandra Jiménez Álvarez 1
  1. 1 Hospital Universitario de Canarias
    info

    Hospital Universitario de Canarias

    San Cristóbal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05qndj312

Revista:
Loquens : revista española de ciencias del habla

ISSN: 2386-2637

Any de publicació: 2019

Número: 6

Pàgines: 2

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.3989/LOQUENS.2019.058 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Loquens : revista española de ciencias del habla

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Los parámetros derivados de la métrica cepstral son cada vez más utilizados en la evaluación acústica de la voz, ya sea como medidas únicas o como parte de índices multivariados. El pico cepstral de mayor prominencia en el cepstrum suavizado (CPPS) ha demostrado en multitud de estudios ser la única medida acústica con la suficiente validez concurrente en la evaluación de la severidad de las alteraciones de la voz tanto en muestras de vocal sostenida como en muestras de habla continua. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer la precisión diagnóstica del CPPS en la detección de la disfonía en español. Se utilizó la configuración que viene por defecto en Praat y la usada en el cálculo del Acoustic Voice Quality Index.Los resultados confirman que el CPPS es una medida acústica válida para detectar la disfonía en español tanto con vocal sostenida como con frases.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Awan, S. N. (2008). Instrumental analysis of phonation. En M. J. Ball, M. R. Perkins, N. Müller y S. Howard (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (p. 347). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Awan, S. N., y Roy, N. (2006). Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: A four-factor acoustic model. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400008353 PMid:16393797
  • Balasubramanium, R. K., Bhat, J. S., Fahim III, S., y Raju III, R. (2011). Cepstral analysis of voice in unilateral adductor vocal fold palsy. Journal of Voice, 25(3), 326-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.12.010 PMid:20346619
  • Barsties, B., y Maryn, Y. (2015). The improvement of internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 36(5), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.04.012 PMid:25964174
  • Barsties, B., y Maryn, Y. (2016). External validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 with extended representativity. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 125(7), 571-583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489416636131 PMid:26951063
  • Boersma, P., y Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [programa informático, versión 6.0.22]. http://www.praat.org/.
  • Brinca, L. F., Batista, A. P. F., Tavares, A. I., Gonçalves, I. C., y Moreno, M. L. (2014). Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: A comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers. Journal of Voice, 28, 282-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.001 PMid:24491499
  • Cecconello, L., Farías, P., y Gurlekian, J. A. (2008). Aplicación del cepstrum en la clínica vocal. Revista de la Federación Argentina de Sociedades de Otorrinolaringología. Edición especial, 30.º Congreso Argentino de Otorrinolaringología, 15(1), 12-14.
  • Dejonckere, P. H. (1998). Cepstral voice analysis: Link with perception and stroboscopy. Revue de Laryngologie, Otologie, Rhinologie (Bord), 119, 245-246.
  • Dejonckere, P. H., y Wieneke, G. (1996). Cepstra of normal and pathological voices in correlation with acoustic, aerodynamic and perceptual data. En M. J. Ball y M. Duckworth (Eds.), Advances in Clinical Phonetics Vol. 6. (pp. 217-226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sspcl.6.13dej
  • Delgado, J., León, N. M., Jiménez, A., e Izquierdo, L. M. (2017). Análisis acústico de la voz: medidas temporales, espectrales y cepstrales en la voz normal con el Praat en una muestra de hablantes de español. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 7(2), 108-127.
  • Delgado-Hernández, J., León-Gómez, N. M., Izquierdo-Arteaga, L. M., y Llanos-Fumero, Y. (2018). Análisis cepstral de la voz normal y patológica en adultos españoles. Medida de la prominencia del pico cepstral suavizado en vocales sostenidas versus habla conectada. Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española, 69, 134-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otorri.2017.05.006 PMid:28867553
  • Deliyski, D. D., Shaw, H. S., y Evans, M. K. (2005). Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements. Journal of Voice, 19(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.07.003 PMid:15766847
  • Deliyski, D. D., Shaw, H. S., Evans, M. K., y Vesselinov, R. (2006). Regression tree approach to studying factors influencing acoustic voice analysis. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 58, 274-288. https://doi.org/10.1159/000093184 PMid:16825780
  • Eadie, T. L., y Baylor, C. R. (2006). The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice. Journal of Voice, 20, 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.007 PMid:16324823
  • Everitt, B. S. (2002). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
  • Heman-Ackah, Y. D., Michael, D. D., Baroody, M. M., Ostrowski, R., Hillenbrand, J., Heuer, R. J., … y Staloff, R. T. (2003). Cepstral peak prominence: A more reliable measure of dysphonia. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 112, 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311200406 PMid:12731627
  • Heman-Ackah, Y. D., Michael, D. D., y Goding, G. S. Jr. (2002). The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 16, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00067-X
  • Heman-Ackah, Y. D., Sataloff, R. T., Laureyns, G., Lurie, D., Michael, D. D., Heuer, R., … y Hillenbrand, J. (2014). Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 28, 783-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.05.005 PMid:25179777
  • Hernández, J. D., León-Gómez, M. L., Jiménez, A., Izquierdo, L. M., y Latoszek, B. B. v. (2018). Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 127, 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418761096 PMid:29490478
  • Hillenbrand, J., Cleveland, R. A., y Erickson, R. L. (1994). Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 769-778. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3704.769
  • Hillenbrand, J., y Houde, R. A. (1996). Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: Dysphonic voices and continuous speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3902.311
  • Hirano, M. (1981). Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. En G. E. Arnold, F. Winckel y B. D. Wyke (Eds.), Disorders of Human Communication 5. Clinical Examination of Voice (pp. 81-84). Vienna: Springer.
  • Hochmuth, S., Brand, T., Zokoll, M. A., Zenker Castro, F., Wardenga, N., y Kollmeier, B. (2012). A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise. International Journal of Audiology, 51, 536-544. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.670731 PMid:22537033
  • Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Kempster, G. B., Erman, A., y Berke, G. S. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3601.21
  • Krom, G. de (1993). A cepstrum-based technique for determining a harmonics-to- noise ratio in speech signals. Journal of Speech, Langauge, and Hearing Research, 36, 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3602.254
  • Landis, J. R., y Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 PMid:843571
  • Latoszek, B. B., Maryn, Y., Gerrit, E., y De Bodt, M. (2017). The Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI): A multivariate acoustic model for breathiness. Journal of Voice, 31, 511e11- 511e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.11.017 PMid:28087124
  • Maryn, Y., Corthals, P., Van Cauwenberge, P., Roy, N., y De Bodt, M. (2010). Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: Combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. Journal of Voice, 24, 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.014 PMid:19883993
  • Maryn, Y., De Bodt, M., Barsties, B., y Roy, N. (2014). The value of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 271, 1609-1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2730-7 PMid:24162765
  • Maryn, Y., De Bodt, M., y Roy, N. (2010). The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: Toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004 PMid:20080243
  • Maryn, Y., Roy, N., De Bodt, M., Van Cauwenberge, P., y Corthals, P. (2009). Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 126, 2619-2634. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3224706 PMid:19894840
  • Portney, L. G., y Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Sauder, C., Bretl, M., y Eadie, T. (2017). Predicting voice disorder status from smoothed measures of cepstral peak prominence using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV). Journal of Voice, 31, 557-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.006 PMid:28169094
  • Wolfe, V., y Martin, D. (1997). Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: Type and severity. Journal of Communication Disorders, 30, 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(96)00112-8
  • Wolfe, V. I., Martin, D. P., y Palmer, C. I. (2000). Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4303.697 PMid:10877439
  • Wuyts, F. L., De Bodt, M. S., Molenberghs, G., Remacle, M., Heylen, L., Millet, B., ... y Van de Heyning, P. H. (2000). The Dysphonia Severity Index: An objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 796-809. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4303.796 PMid:10877446
  • Yiu, E., Worrall, L., Longland, J., y Mitchell, C. (2000). Analysing vocal quality of connected speech using Kay's Computerized Speech Lab: a preliminary finding. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(4), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200050023994
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet