Effects of inefficiency on marginal costs, degree of economies of scale and technical changea theoretical relationship

  1. Juan José Díaz-Hernández 1
  2. Eduardo Martínez-Budría 1
  3. Rosa Marina González 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Revue:
Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa

ISSN: 1886-516X

Année de publication: 2020

Volumen: 29

Pages: 190-207

Type: Article

DOI: 10.46661/REVMETODOSCUANTECONEMPRESA.2804 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

In this paper, a theoretical relationship is obtained to measure the effect that inefficiency has on marginal costs, degree of economies of scale and technical change. It is shown that when the relationship between inefficiency and output level is ignored, the estimation of marginal costs and the degree of economies of scale are incorrect. The measurement of technical change is also wrongly calculated if one does not consider the variation of inefficiency over time. This could lead to incorrect pricing decisions that would transfer inefficiency to the consumer via prices and non-optimal investments in productive capacity. In addition, the effect of technical change on costs could be erroneously estimated. The empirical application of this theoretical model to Spanish port authorities during the period 2008-2016 shows that marginal costs of port services were overestimated, the degree of economies of scale was underestimated and the time variations of the inefficiency were interpreted erroneously as technical change when the relationship between inefficiency and output and time is not considered

€ Voir financement

Information sur le financement

The authors are grateful for the constructive comments of the reviewers and the editor, as well as the help of Professor Lourdes Trujillo (University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) and the public entity Puertos del Estado in the compilation of the data used in this paper.

Financeurs

Références bibliographiques

  • Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A.K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
  • Atkinson, S., & Cornwell, C. (1994). Parametric estimation of technical and allocative inefficiency with panel data. International Economic Review, 35, 231-244.
  • Atkinson, C., & Halvorsen, R. (1984). Parametric efficiency test, economies of scale and input demand in U.S. electric power generation. International Economic Review, 25, 647-662.
  • Battese, G.E., & Coelli, T.J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332.
  • Bauer, P. W. (1990). Decomposing TFP growth in the presence of cost inefficiency, non constant returns of scale, and technological progress. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1, 287-301.
  • Díaz-Hernández, J.J., Martínez-Budría, E., & Jara-Díaz, S. (2008). Parametric estimation of inefficiency in cargo handling in Spanish ports. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 223-232.
  • Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Serie A, General 120, Part 3, 253-281.
  • Jara-Díaz, S., Martínez-Budría, E., Cortés, C. and Basso L. (2002). A multioutput cost function for the services of Spanish ports' infrastructure. Transportation, 29, 419-437.
  • Jara-Díaz, S., Martínez-Budría, E., & Díaz-Hernández, J.J. (2006). Multiple output in port cost function. Port Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 67-84.
  • Kumbhakar, S.C. (1997). Modelling allocative inefficiency in a translog cost function and cost share equations: an exact relationship. Journal of Econometrics, 76(1/2), 351-356.
  • Kumbhakar, S.C., & Lovell, C.A.K. (2000). Stochastic frontier analysis. USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lau, L.J., & Yotopoulos, P.A. (1971). A test for relative efficiency and application to Indian agriculture. American Economic Review, 61, 94-109.
  • Meeusen, W., & Van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435-444.
  • Shephard, R.W. (1953). Cost and production functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Toda, Y. (1976). Estimation of a cost function when cost is not a minimum: The case of soviet manufacturing industries, 1958-1971. Review of Economics and Statistics, 58, 259-268.
  • UNCTAD (1975). Port pricing. New York: United Nations.
La source de données: Dialnet