Domesticar el gestolos métodos alternativos de representación en la ilustración científica

  1. Sellet, Didier Pierre
Journal:
Revista de Bellas Artes: Revista de Artes Plásticas, Estética, Diseño e Imágen

ISSN: 1695-761X

Year of publication: 2008

Issue: 6

Pages: 37-58

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRIULL editor

More publications in: Revista de Bellas Artes: Revista de Artes Plásticas, Estética, Diseño e Imágen

Abstract

The role of images in the development of science is historically recognised. Currently, the scope of scientific illustration is growing and is adding new functions to its usual descriptive tasks. Archaeological illustration is without doubt a discipline which provides one of the best examples of this. In archaeology, drawing fulfils multiple functions, in the vast majority of research stages, and has become established as an indispensable methodological tool. The repeated confrontation of archaeologists with the task of drawing, a skill for which they may feel a greater or lesser affinity, has led them to try to rationalise its practice. With the aim of speeding up this part of their work, some authors have designed drawing machines as alternative representation procedures. Careful study of these devices and their characteristics reveals the complex nature of archaeological illustration as well as exposing scientists’ assessments of them.

Bibliographic References

  • ADDINGTON, Lucile R., Lithic illustration. Drawing flaked stone artifacts for publication. University of Chicago Press, Karl W. Butzer and Leslie G. Freeman. Chicago, London. 1986.
  • ADKINS, Lesley y ADKINS, Roy A., Archaeological illustration. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, New York, Port Chester. 1989.
  • ANGLE, M., BRUSCHINI, S. y DOTTARELLI, R., Il computer nello strato: integrazione di tecniche informatiche alla ricerca archeologica. Archeologia e informatica. Atti del convegno. Roma. 1988.
  • ARBEITER, A., K ARAS, U. y PÄFFGEN, B., San Juan de Baños, lev antamiento planimétrico mediante técnicas novedosas. Revista de Arqueología. 154, 1994, pp. 6-11.
  • BURGERS, H.J.M., «A pottery-drawing device». Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor net Ondheidkundig Bodenmouderzock. 27, 1977, pp. 237-9.
  • CHEVALIER, Jean, «Traitement superficiel et provisoire (sans altération visible) des pièces lithiques en obsidienne dans le but du dessin et/ou de la prise de vue». Notes internes. 71. CNRS y Centre de Recherches Archéologiques Sophia Antipolis. 1984.
  • CLEGG, John, «A gadget to help in drawning small finds». Australian field ar chaelogy: a guide to techniques. G. Connah, A ustralian Institute of A boriginal Studies. Canberra, 1983, pp . 169-70.
  • CUBILLO LÓPEZ, Rosa y SELLET, Didier, «Definiendo jalones para un acercamiento a la historia de las imágenes científicas». Bellas Artes. 3, 2005, pp. 147-67.
  • DANIEL, Ruth, «Aids to drawing: the copy scanner and K enrick in America. 1: the copy scanner». Antiquity. 46, 1972, pp. 147-8.
  • DAUVOIS, M., Précis de dessin dynamique et str uctural des industries lithiques préhistoriques . P ierre Fanlac. Périgueux. 1976.
  • DENNISON Austin D., «M ethod of drawing stone ar tefacts». ASA Newsletter. 20-2. Archaeological Survey Association of Southern California, 1973, pp. 7-38.
  • DUVAL, P.M., «Relevés photogrammétriques d’objets archéologiques». Gallia. XXX/2, 1972, pp. 259- 73.
  • EICHSTAEDT P.A., «Le pantographe de terrain: un appareil à dessiner pour l’archéologie et la recherche architecturale». Nouvelles de l’Archéologie. 21, 1985, pp. 56-8.
  • FEUGERE, Michel, «Normalisation du dessin en archéologie: le mobilier non céramique (métal, verre, os, bois, terre cuite)». Documents d’Archéologie Méridionale. spécial 2. Montpellier. 1982.
  • FONTCUBERTA, Joan, El beso de Judas. Gustavo Gili. Barcelona. 1997.
  • GÓMEZ MOLINA, Juan José [coord.], Máquinas y herramientas de dibujo. Cátedra. Madrid. 2002.
  • HODGES, Elaine R.S. [coor d.], The Guild Handbook of Scientific I llustration (second edition). John Wiley and Sons. Hoboken. 2003.
  • HOLLADAY, J.S., «A technical aid to pottery drawing». Antiquity. 50, 1976, pp. 223-30.
  • HORNE, S.H., «Aids to drawing: the copy scanner and Kenrick in America. 2: Kenrick in America». Antiquity. 46, 1972, pp. 147-8.
  • IVINS, W.M., Imagen impresa y conocimiento. Análisis de la imagen prefotográfica. Gustavo Gili. Barcelona. 1975.
  • KENRICK, P., «Aids to the drawing of finds». Antiquity. 45, 1971, pp. 205-9.
  • LAURENT, Pierre, «Dessin et archéologie». Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France. XXV/1. Tours, 1986, pp. 87-98.
  • LAURENT, Pierre, «Le dessin des objets préhistoriques: une intr oduction». Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France. XXIV/1. Tours, 1985, pp. 83-96.
  • LAURENT, Pierre, «Les sections et les coupes dans le dessin d ’archéologie préhistorique». Origini, Preistoria e Protoistoria delle civilta’Antiche. 4. Roma, 1970, pp. 7-44.
  • RIGOIR, Yves, Le dessin technique en céramologie. Publication du Laboratoire d’Etude et de Documentation des Sigillées. Lambesc. 1975.
  • SCOTT P.J., «Drawing and measurement of finds: a reflex action». World Archaeology. XIV/2, 1982, pp. 191-9.
  • SICARD, Monique, La fabrique du regard. Odile Jacob. Paris. 1998.
  • STERUD, Eugene L. y BOHLIN, Ann-Kristin, «Small find illustration: a combined photographic/line drawing technique». Journal of field Archaeology. 3, 1976, pp. 103-10.
  • TERRELL, John, «Potsherd rim angles: a simple device». Antiquity. 45, 1971, pp. 299-302.
  • YOUNG, Karen Sue «A technique for illustrating pottery designs». American Antiquity. 35, 1970, pp. 488-91.
Data source: Dialnet