Influence of angle Kappa on the optimal intraocular orientation of asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses
- Sergio Bonaque 1
- Matt T. Jaskulski 2
- David Carmona Ballester 3
- Alicia Cristina Pareja Ríos 4
- J.M. Trujillo Sevilla 1
- 1 Wooptix S.L. San Cristobal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
-
2
Universidad de Murcia
info
-
3
Universidad de La Laguna
info
-
4
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
info
ISSN: 1888-4296
Year of publication: 2021
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
Pages: 78-85
Type: Article
More publications in: Journal of Optometry: peer-reviewed Journal of the Spanish General Council of Optometry
Metrics
Cited by
SCImago Journal Rank
- Year 2021
- SJR Journal Impact: 0.653
- Best Quartile: Q1
- Area: Optometry Quartile: Q1 Rank in area: 3/12
Scopus CiteScore
- Year 2021
- CiteScore of the Journal : 3.6
- Area: Optometry Percentile: 68
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)
- Year 2021
- Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.92
- Best Quartile: Q2
- Area: OPHTHALMOLOGY Quartile: Q2 Rank in area: 28/94
Dimensions
(Data updated as of 04-03-2023)- Total citations: 9
- Recent citations: 9
- Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): 3.69
- Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 4.6
Abstract
Purpose to evaluate the effects of kappa angle and intraocular orientation on the theoretical performance of asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL). Methods For a total of 21 corneal aberrations, a computational analysis simulated the implantation of a computationally designed MIOL. An image quality parameter (IQ) (visually modulated transfer function metric) was calculated for a 5.0-mm pupil and for three conditions: distance, intermediate, and near vision. The procedure was repeated for each eye after a rotation of the MIOL with respect to the cornea from 0º to 360º in 5º steps. Kappa angles from 0 to 900 microns, in 150 microns steps, combined with two two variants of MIOL centration were tested: in the corneal apex or in the center of the entrance pupil. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results There were statistically significant differences of the IQ depending of the intraocular orientation of the MIOL. If kappa angle was increased, there was a statistically significant decrease of the IQ. The IQ maintained stable when the optimal intraocular orientation was re-calculated for each kappa angle. In general, the inter-variability of the results between subjects was very high. There were no strong evidences supporting that there exists a preferable centration point. Conclusions Our results suggest that kappa angle theoretically affects significantly the performance of asymmetric MIOL implantation. However, its negative effect can be compensated if a customized intraocular orientation is calculated taking into account the presence of the kappa angle.