Prostitution Policies and Attitudes Toward Prostitutes

  1. Delgado, Naira 1
  2. Pina, Afroditi
  3. Bonache, Helena 1
  4. Hernández-Cabrera, Juan A.
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Journal:
Archives of Sexual Behavior

ISSN: 0004-0002

Year of publication: 2021

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1007/S10508-020-01891-9 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Abstract

The present study examined whether regulatory attitudes toward prostitution are related to agency attributed to prostitutes and moral outrage. A Spanish sample (N = 391, aged 18–53 years old) completed a questionnaire that included two separate parts. In the first part, participants answered a scale on regulatory attitudes toward prostitution; in the second part, after reading one of two scenarios, participants answered questions about agency and moral outrage. Results showed a different pattern in the link between regulatory attitudes and social perception when participants perceived prostitutes as victims of sexual slavery (Scenario 1) or as women who freely choose to sell sexual services (Scenario 2). This study provides empirical evidence of how some regulatory attitudes toward prostitution are linked to mind attributions and negative feelings toward sex workers, and how it depends on the type of prostitute who practices it. These findings contribute to our knowledge of attitudes toward prostitution, which could inform future policy-making.

Bibliographic References

  • Abel, G. (2018). The problem with sex work policies [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1925–1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1366-5.
  • APRAMP. (2011). La trata con fines de explotación sexual. Retrieved from https://apramp.org/download/la-trata-con-fines-de-explotacion-sexual/.
  • Armstrong, L. (2020). Decriminalisation of sex work in the post-truth era? Strategic storytelling in neo-abolitionist accounts of the New Zealand model. Criminology & Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820918898.
  • Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2016). The tripartite theory of machiavellian morality: Judgment, influence, and conscience as distinct moral adaptations. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of morality: Evolutionary psychology (pp. 3–25). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8.
  • Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2016). Parenthood as a moral imperative? Moral outrage and the stigmatization of voluntarily childfree women and men. Sex Roles, 76, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0606-1.
  • Basil, M. C. (2015). Pushing for new perspectives: Policy model of criminalized prostitution and its effect on victims of sex trafficking (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/gh_theses.
  • Basow, S. A., & Campanile, F. (1990). Attitudes toward prostitution as a function of attitudes toward feminism in college students: An exploratory study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00009.x.
  • Bastian, B., Laham, S. M., Wilson, S., Haslam, N., & Koval, P. (2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X521383.
  • Benoit, C., Jansson, S. M., Smith, M., & Flagg, J. (2018). Prostitution stigma and its effect on the working conditions, personal lives, and health of sex workers. Journal of Sex Research, 55, 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1393652.
  • Benoit, C., Jansson, S. M., Smith, M., & Flagg, J. (2017). “Well, it should be changed for one, because it’s our bodies”: Sex workers’ views on Canada’s punitive approach toward sex work. Social Science, 6, 52–69. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020052.
  • Benoit, C., Smith, M., Jansson, M., Healey, P., & Magnuson, D. (2019). “The prostitution problem”: Claims, evidence, and policy outcomes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1905–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1276-6.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
  • Brents, B. G. (2016). Neoliberalism’s market morality and heteroflexibility: Protectionist and free market discourses in debates for legal prostitution. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0250-0.
  • Calvo, K., & Penadés, A. (2014). Attitudes toward the regularization of prostitution in Spain: An approximation based on survey data. Teoría y Derecho: Revista de Pensamiento Jurídico, 17, 78–99.
  • Cao, L., Lu, R., & Mei, X. (2015). Acceptance of prostitution and its social determinants in Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 1171–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15609920.
  • Charles, N., Wadia, K., Ferrer-Fons, M., & Allaste, A. A. (2018). “I’m a feminist, I’m not ashamed and I’m proud”: Young people’s activism and feminist identities in Estonia, Spain and the UK. Women’s Studies International Forum, 67, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.11.008.
  • Cojocaru, C. (2016). My experience is mine to tell: Challenging the abolitionist victimhood framework. Anti-trafficking Review, 7, 12–38. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.20121772.
  • Comte, J. (2014). Decriminalization of sex work: Feminist discourses in light of research. Sexuality and Culture, 18, 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9174-5.
  • Crowhurst, I., Outshoorn, J., & Skilbrei, M. L. (2012). Introduction: Prostitution policies in Europe. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-012-0100-7.
  • Danna, D. (2012). Client-only criminalization in the city of Stockholm: A local research on the application of the “Swedish model” of prostitution policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0072-z.
  • De Miguel, A. (2018). Neoliberalismo sexual: El mito de la libre elección. Madrid: Feminismos.
  • Delgado, J. B., & Castro, M. C. (2014). Construction and validation of a subjective scale of stigma and discrimination (SISD) for the gay men and transgender women population in Chile. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0150-0.
  • Digidiki, V., Dikaiou, M., & Baka, A. (2016). Attitudes towards the victim and the client of sex trafficking in Greece: The influence of belief in a just world, structural attributions, previous experience, and attitudes towards prostitution. Journal of Human Trafficking, 2, 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2016.1176385.
  • Ellison, G., & Weitzer, R. (2017). The dynamics of male and female street prostitution in Manchester, England. Men and Masculinities, 20, 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X15625318.
  • Freiberg, A., & Carson, W. (2010). The limits to evidence-based policy: Evidence, emotion and criminal justice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00674.x.
  • Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475.
  • Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025883.
  • Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748.
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814.
  • Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4.
  • Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Kashima, Y., & Bain, P. (2008). Attributing and denying humanness to others. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 55–85). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
  • Hayes-Smith, R., & Shekarkhar, Z. (2010). Why is prostitution criminalized? An alternative viewpoint on the construction of sex work. Contemporary Justice Review, 13, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580903549201.
  • Hechler, S., & Kessler, T. (2018). On the difference between moral outrage and empathic anger: Anger about wrongful deeds or harmful consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.005.
  • Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., & Betancort, M. (2019). ULLRToolbox. Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/site/ullrtoolbox/.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Huschke, S. (2017). Victims without a choice? A critical view on the debate about sex work in Northern Ireland. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14, 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0254-9.
  • Jonsson, S., & Jakobsson, N. (2017). Is buying sex morally wrong? Comparing attitudes toward prostitution using individual-level data across eight Western European countries. Women’s Studies International Forum, 61, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.12.007.
  • Khamitov, M., Rotman, J. D., & Piazza, J. (2016). Perceiving the agency of harmful agents: A test of dehumanization versus moral typecasting accounts. Cognition, 143, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.009.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
  • Kuosmanen, J. (2011). Attitudes and perceptions about legislation prohibiting the purchase of sexual services in Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 14, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691451003744341.
  • Levin, L., & Peled, E. (2011). The Attitudes toward Prostitutes and Prostitution Scale: A new tool for measuring public attitudes toward prostitutes and prostitution. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511406451.
  • Levy, J., & Jakobsson, P. (2014). Sweden’s abolitionist discourse and law: Effects on the dynamics of Swedish sex work and on the lives of Sweden’s sex workers. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14, 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814528926.
  • Li, M., Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2014). Toward a comprehensive taxonomy of dehumanization: Integrating two senses of humannes, mind perception theory, and stereotype content model. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.4.
  • Lindenmeier, J., Schleer, C., & Pricl, D. (2012). Consumer outrage: Emotional reactions to unethical corporate behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1364–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.022.
  • Long, S. L., Mollen, D., & Smith, N. G. (2012). College women’s attitudes toward sex workers. Sex Roles, 66, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0088-0.
  • Malgesini, G. (2006). Impacto de una posible normalización profesional de la prostitución en la viabilidad y sostenibilidad futura del sistema de pensiones de protección social. Informe ESCODE 2006. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. Secretaría de Estado de la Seguridad Social. http://www.seg-social.es/prdi00/groups/public/documents/binario/51873.pdf.
  • McCarthy, B., Benoit, C., Jansson, M., & Kolar, K. (2012). Regulating sex work: Heterogeneity in legal strategies. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173915.
  • Meneses, C., Rúa, A., & Uroz, J. (2018). Explorando los motivos para pagar servicios sexuales desde las opiniones sobre la prostitución. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 76(2). https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2018.76.2.17.47.
  • Meneses, C., Uroz, J., Rúa, A., Gortazar, C., & Castaño, M. J. (2015). Apoyando a las víctimas de trata. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad de España. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4247.7841.
  • Moran, R., & Farley, M. (2019). Consent, coercion, and culpability: Is prostitution stigmatized work or an exploitive and violent practice rooted in sex, race, and class inequality? [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1947–1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1371-8.
  • Östergren, P. (2017). From zero-tolerance to full integration: Rethinking prostitution policies. Retrieved from: http://www.demandat.eu/publications/zero-tolerance-full-integration-rethinking-prostitution-policies.
  • Pacilli, M. G., Giovannelli, I., Spaccatini, F., Vaes, J., & Barbaranelli, C. (2018). Elective abortion predicts the dehumanization of women and men through the mediation of moral outrage. Social Psychology, 49, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000351.
  • Pagano, S. J., & Huo, Y. J. (2007). The role of moral emotions in predicting support for political actions in Post-War Iraq. Political Psychology, 28, 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00563.x.
  • Primoratz, I. (2013). Sexual morality. In H. Lafollette (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Puvia, E., & Vaes, J. (2015). Promoters versus victims of objectification: Why women dehumanize sexually objectified female targets. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28, 63–93.
  • R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Robbins, P., & Litton, P. (2018). Crime, punishment, and causation: The effect of etiological information on the perception of moral agency. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000146.
  • Rodríguez, M., & Gillis, K. (2018). Morality politics and prostitution policy in Brussels: A diachronic comparison. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0303-z.
  • Sacramento, O. (2011). Liminal spaces: reflections on the proxemia of cross-border demand for prostitution. Space and Culture, 14, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331211412255.
  • Salerno, J. M., & Peter-Hagene, L. C. (2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24, 2069–2078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486988.
  • Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2017). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288.
  • Schmitt, S., Euchner, E. M., & Preidel, C. (2013). Regulating prostitution and same-sex marriage in Italy and Spain: The interplay of political and societal veto players in two Catholic societies. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.761512.
  • Serughetti, G. (2018). Rethinking force and consent, victimization and agency: A feminist approach to prostitution policy. Femeris, 2, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.20318/femeris.2018.432179.
  • Skilbrei, M. L. (2019). Assessing the power of prostitution policies to shift markets, attitudes, and ideologies. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024623.
  • Sprankle, E., Bloomquist, K., Butcher, C., Gleason, N., & Schaefer, Z. (2018). The role of sex work stigma in victim blaming and empathy of sexual assault survivors. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15, 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0282-0.
  • Swanson, J. (2016). Sexual liberation or violence against women? The debate on the legalization of prostitution and the relationship to human trafficking. New Criminal Law Review, 19, 592–639. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2016.19.4.592.
  • Torrado, E., Romero, Y., & Gutiérrez, J. (2018). An analysis of social perceptions of citizenship. The normalization of the prostitution of women as a necessary service. Revista Internacional de Estudios Feministas, 3, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.17979/arief.2018.3.1.3078.
  • Valor-Segura, I., Expósito, F., & Moya, M. (2011). Attitudes toward prostitution: Is it an ideological issue? European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 3, 159–176.
  • van Breen, J. A., Spears, R., Kuppens, T., & de Lemus, S. (2017). A multiple identity approach to gender: Identification with women, identification with feminists, and their interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01019.
  • Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2017). Sex work criminalization is barking up the wrong tree. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1008-3.
  • Villacampa, C. (2017). Municipal ordinances and street prostitution in Spain. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9313-2.
  • Wagenaar, H. (2017). Why prostitution policy (usually) fails and what to do about it? Social Sciences, 6, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020043.
  • Wagenaar, H., & Altink, S. (2012). Prostitution as morality politics or why it is exceedingly difficult to design and sustain effective prostitution policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-012-0095-0.
  • Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006.
  • Weitzer, R. (2017). Legal prostitution systems in Europe. In H. Nelen & D. Siegel (Eds.), Contemporary organized crime, studies of organized crime (Vol. 16, pp. 47–64). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55973-5_4.
  • Weitzer, R. (2020). The campaign against sex work in the United States: A successful moral crusade. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 17, 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00404-1.
  • Wylie, G. (2017). Neo-abolitionis, and transnational advocacy networks: Globalising an idea. In E. Ward & G. Wylie (Eds.), Feminism, prostitution and the state: The politics of neo-abolitionism (pp. 12–28). London: Routledge.