Endophytic Fungi from Artemisia Spp. — enemies of Sclerotinia Sclerotiorum

  1. Cosoveanu Andreea
  2. Rodriguez Sabina Samuel 1
  3. Espinel Guerra Guacimara 1
  4. Cabrera Raimundo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Protecția Plantelor în Agricultura Convențională și Ecologică 2018 (2018. Moldova)

Year of publication: 2018

Pages: 175-179

Type: Conference paper


Fungal endophytes were isolated from 12 Artemisia species. 57 strains were evaluatedfor their antagonist traits against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and 33 of them were consideredbioactive. Almost all strains in Aspergillus taxa (3 of 4 species) performed as rapid colonizers ofthe substrate in the dual culture interaction. Both strains identified as Epicoccum nigrumdetained pathogen growth at > 2 mm. Of 19 endophytic fungal solvent extracts two strainsidentified as Alternaria alternata and Stemphylium sp. inhibited mycelial growth in biometricassay with 42.40% and 81.41%, respectively (at [C] = 1%). Almost 4 times more strains werefound as potential antagonists than as bio - sources of solvent extracted active metabolites (33strains versus 8).

Bibliographic References

  • Collinge, D.B. et al. 2018. Searching for novel fungal biological control agents for plant disease control among endophytes. Endophytes. Cambridge University Press.
  • Chowdhary, K & Kaushik, K. 2015. Fungal Endophyte Diversity and Bioactivity in the Indian Medicinal Plant Ocimum sanctum Linn, PLoS ONE, 10(11), pp. e0141444 179
  • Cosoveanu, A. et al. 2016a. Active fungal endophytes against phytopathogenic fungidwellers of Romanian and Canarian Artemisia spp. Scientific Papers-Series B, Horticulture, (60), pp. 291-298.
  • Cosoveanu, A. et al. 2016b.Fungi as endophytes in Chinese Artemisia spp.: juxtaposed elements of phylogeny, diversity and bioactivity. Mycosphere, 7(2), pp.102-117.
  • Cosoveanu, A. et al. 2018. Fungi as endophytes in Artemisia thuscula: Juxtaposed elements of diversity and phylogeny. Journal of Fungi, 4(1), pp. 17.
  • Gonzalez Coloma, A. et al. 2016. Endophytic Fungi and Their Bioprospection. Fungi: Applications and Management Strategies Progress in Mycological Research, CRC Press, pp. 14- 31.
  • Inglis, G.D., & Boland G.J., 1992. Evaluation of filamentous fungi isolated from petals of bean and rapeseed for suppression of white mold, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 38, pp. 124-129.
  • Kusari, P. et al. 2013. Endophytic fungi harbored in Cannabis sativa L.: diversity and potential as biocontrol agents against host plant-specific phytopathogens. Fungal diversity, 60(1), pp. 137-151.
  • Li, G.Q. et al. 2003. Antagonism and biocontrol potential of Ulocladium atrum on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Biological Control, 28(1), pp. 11-18.
  • Rocha, R. et al. 2009. Selection of endophytic fungi from comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) for in vitro biological control of the phytopathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.), Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 40, pp.73-78.
  • Rodríguez, M.A. et al. 2011. Clonostachys rosea BAFC3874 as a Sclerotinia sclerotiorum antagonist: mechanisms involved and potential as a biocontrol agent. Journal of applied microbiology, 110(5), pp. 1177-1186.
  • Smolińska, U. & Kowalska B. 2018. Biological control of the soil-borne fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum –– a review. Journal of Plant Pathology, 100, pp.1-12.
  • Zhang, J. et al. 2018. Baseline sensitivity and control efficacy of propiconazole against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Crop Protection, 114, pp. 208-214.