Incivilities and Dehumanization: The Role of the Physical Environment
-
1
Universidad de La Laguna
info
ISSN: 0163-9625, 1521-0456
Year of publication: 2021
Pages: 1-16
Type: Article
More publications in: Deviant Behavior
Abstract
The environment determines the way in which people interpret social life. In fact, depending on the context, multiple potential attitudes can be evoked by an attitude object. The purpose of this research is to test whether the perception of uncivil behavior and its perpetrators is affected by the physical environment in which this behavior is framed. Specifically, we explore the role of two environmental dimensions – naturalness and openness – in the way we evaluate behaviors that transgress social norms and their agents. In a pilot study, participants (N = 124) considered counter-normative behaviors to be more uncivil and their perpetrators to be less human in natural contexts. In the main study, participants (N = 199) evaluated the naturalness and openness dimensions separately and it was found that naturalness is the one that most influences the negative perception of uncivil behavior and the only one that has an effect on the dehumanization process. The results of this research support the idea that the physical environment plays an important role in the perception of uncivil behavior and the dehumanized view of its agent. The importance of the results within the fields of deviant behavior, social psychology, and environmental psychology are discussed.
Bibliographic References
- 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.18
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.034
- 10.1037/h0055756
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.5
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.008
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.016
- 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
- Brauer Markus, (2009), European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, pp. 490
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02182.x
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00365.x
- 10.1002/ejsp.126
- Cialdini, Robert B., Carl A. Kallgren, and Raymond R. Reno. 1991. “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24:201–234. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
- 10.1080/01973533.2012.712020
- 10.1089/eco.2014.0042
- 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- 10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.004
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0127247
- 10.1126/science.1134475
- 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.06.001
- 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
- 10.1177/0146167206293191
- 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.937
- 10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80024-6
- 10.1080/02699931.2017.1388769
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005
- Irwin Amy, (2020), Journal of Further and Higher Education, pp. 1
- Joly, Janneke F. 2008. ” People on Our Minds: When Humanized Contexts Activate Social Norms”. University of Groningen.
- 10.1177/0146167208318401
- Knepp Kristen A. F, (2012), Journal of Effective Teaching, 12, pp. 33
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4588-10.2011
- 10.1037/pspp0000048
- 10.1177/00139160121973025
- 10.1177/0146167212436611
- Lindenberg Siegwart, (2013), Encouraging Sustainable Behavior, pp. 37
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.089
- 10.1177/1088868319845938
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.005
- 10.1080/016396200266379
- 10.1111/bjso.12246
- Nasar Jack L, (1998), The Evaluative Image of the City
- Nassauer Joan I., (1988), Landscape and land use planning: Proceedings from the 1988 International Federation of Landscape Architects World Congress, pp. 27
- Newman Oscar, (1972), Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Planning
- 10.5465/ame.2005.15841946
- 10.1007/s10611-017-9739-6
- 10.1111/1467-954X.00409
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.005
- Rodríguez-Gómez, Laura, Naira Delgado, Verónica Betancor, Ramón Rodríguez-Torres, and Rodríguez-Pérez Armando. Under review. “Social Perceptions of Civility and Their Link with Dehumanization Theory.”
- 10.1174/217119712799240233
- Ross, L. & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation:Perspectives of social psychology. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
- 10.1016/j.scs.2014.04.011
- 10.1068/a35111
- 10.1177/0013916504266806
- Stamps, Arthur E. 2015. “Threat, Permeability, and Environmental Enclosure.” Institute of Envioronmental Quality. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3655.2808.
- 10.1348/000712609X436453
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021
- 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.815