El uso del Ambiente Virtual de Aprendizaje entre el profesorado de educación superiorun análisis de género

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahmad, T. B. T., Basha, K. M., Marzuki, A. M., Hisham, N. A. & Sahari, M. (2010). Faculty’s acceptance of computer based technology: Cross-validation of an extended model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 268-279. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/ahmad.html.
• Alaminos, A. (2006). El muestreo en la investigación social. En A. Alaminos y J.L. Castejón, Elaboración, análisis e interpretación de encuestas, cuestionarios y escalas de opinión (46-67). Alcoy: Marfil.
• Almerich Cerveró, G., Suárez Rodríguez, J. M., Jornet Meliá, J. M., & Orellana Alonso, M. N. (2011). Las competencias y el uso de las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (TIC) por el profesorado: estructura dimensional. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 13(1), 28-42.
• Aristovnik, A., Tomazevic, N., Kerzic, D., & Umek, L. (2017). The impact of demographic factors on selected aspects of e-learning in higher education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(2), 114-12
• Asiri, M. J. S. (2012). Factors influencing the use of learning management system in Saudi Arabian Higher Education: A theoretical framework. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 125-137.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioural Change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), pp. 191-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. y Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children’s Aspirations and Career Trajectories. Child Development, 72 (1), pp. 187-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273
• Bidarian, S., Davoudi, A.M. (2011) A Model for application of ICT in the process of teaching and learning. International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 29 (2011) 1032-1041.
• Bishop, Y.M., Fienberg, S.E. y Holland, P.W. (2007). Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Theory and Applications. New York: Springer.
• Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136.
• Cabero J. y Barroso, J. (2016). ICT teacher training: a view of the TPACK model. Cultura y Educación, 28(3), 633-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1203526.
• Cabero, J., Sampedro, B y Gallego, O. (2016). Valoraciones de la “aceptación de la tecnología de formación virtual” por profesores universitarios asistentes a un curso de formación virtual. EDUTEC, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 56, 31-47. Recuperado el 27/02/2018 de http://www.edutec.es/revista.
• Cantón, I., Cañón, R y Grande, M. (2017). La comunicación como subdimensión de la competencia digital en futuros maestros de primaria. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 33-47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2017.i50.02.
• Casquero, G. B., García, L. M. C., & González, R. F. L. (2014). Competencias Tecnológicas de los profesores de Infantil y Primaria de Extremadura en función del género. IE Comunicaciones: Revista Iberoamericana de Informática Educativa, (19), 3.
• Castellanos, A., Sánchez, C. y Calderero, J. (2017). Nuevos modelos tecnopedagógicos. Competencia digital de los alumnos universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 19(1), 1-9, (Recuperado de http://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/1148
• Chen, R. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015.
• Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). The role of self-monitoring in learning chemistry with dynamic visualizations. In Zohar, A., Dori, Y. J. (Eds), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research. 133-163. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Chou, C., Wu, H. C., & Chen, C. H. (2011). Re-visiting college students’ attitudes toward the Internet-based on a 6-T model: Gender and grade level difference. Computers & Education, 56(4), 939-947
• Clark, R. C. and Meyer, R. E. (2011), E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning, Pfeiffer, New York.
• Dusick, D. M. (1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members’ use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (2), 123-137.
• Egbo O. P., Chinwe R., Ikechukwu C., & Onwumere J. U. (2011). Gender perception and attitude towards ELearning: A case of Business students, University of Nigeria. International Journal of Computer Application, 1, 135–148.
• González-Gómez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodríguez, Ó. M., & Alonso, M. Á. M. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290.
• Grundy, F. (1996) Women and computers. Exeter, England: Intellect Books
• Güdüz, A. e İşman, A. (2018). Pre-Service Teachers’ Perception of Distance Education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 125-129.
• Jelfs, A. y Richardson, J. (2013). The use of digital technologies across the adult life span in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 2, 338-351. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01308.x./s11423-014-9355-4.
• Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1535-1554. doi:10.1007/s10639-015-9398-0
• Kim, Y. L. (2010). Gender role and the use of university library website resources: a social cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Information Science, 36(5), 603–617.
• Kirkup, G., & Kirkwood, A. (2005). Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching—a tale of gradualism rather than revolution. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 185-199.
• Koch, S., Muller, S. & Sieverding, M. (2008). Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1795-1803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.007
• Krause, M., Pietzner, V., Dori, Y. J., & Eilks, I. (2017). Differences and Developments in Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Prospective Chemistry Teachers Concerning the Use of ICT in Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4405-4417.
• Lai, K. y Hong, K. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725-738. doi:10.1111/bjet.12161.
• Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (Vol. 23). Springer Science & Business Media
• Lohbeck, A., Hagenauer, G., & Frenzel, A. C. (2018). Teachers' self-concepts and emotions: Conceptualization and relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 111-120.
• Mahmud, R., & Ismail, M. A. H. (2010). Impact of Training and Experience in Using ICT on in-Service Teachers' Basic ICT Literacy. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (2), 6.
• Moran, M., Hawkes, M., & El Gayar, O. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.1.d
• O´Dwyer, L. y Bernauer, J. (2014). Quantitative research for the qualitative researcher. California: Sage.
• OCDE (2010). PISA 2009 at a glance. OECD Publishing http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264095298-en.
• Ong, C. S. & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
• Pohl, M. (1997). The Internet: a feminine technology? In R. Lander, & A. Adam (Eds.), Women in Computing (pp. 190–197). Exeter, England: Intellect Books.
• Raman A., Rozalina Khalid Y., & Rizuan M. (2014). Usage of learning management system (Moodle) among postgraduate students: UTAUT model. Asian Social Science, 10, 186–195 http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n14p186.
• Radovan, M. y Kristl, N. (2017). Acceptance of Technology and its Impact on Teacher’s Activities in Virtual Classroom: Integrating UTAUT and CoI into a Combined Model. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 11-22.
• Ríos, J.M., Gómez, E. y Priscilla, M. (2018). Valoración de competencias TIC del profesorado universitario: un caso en Chile. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 52, 55-65. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i52.04.
• Rodríguez Espinosa, H., Restrepo Betancur, L. F., & Aranzazu Taborda, D. (2016). Desarrollo de habilidades digitales docentes para implementar ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje en la docencia universitaria. Sophia, 12(2), 261-270.
• Rodríguez, E., Restrepo, L. y Aranzazu, D. (2014). Alfabetización informática y uso de sistemas de gestión del aprendizaje (LMS) en la Docencia. Revista de Educación Superior, 43, 171, 139-159.
• Romero, R., Cabero, J. y Barroso, J. (2016). E- Learning of Andalusian University's Lecturers. Gender. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15, 2, 25-37.
• Rossi Cordero, A. E., & Barajas Frutos, M. (2015). Elección de estudios CTIM y desequilibrios de género. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 0059-76.
• Sabariego, M. (2012). El proceso de investigación (parte 2). En Bisquerra, R. (coord.), Metodología de la investigación educativa (pp. 127-163). (3ª. ed.). Madrid: La Muralla.
• Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95–110.
• Sieverding, M. & Koch, S. C. (2009). (Self-)Evaluation of computer competence: How gender matters. Computers & Education, 52(3), 696-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.016
• Sosa, E., Salinas, J., & De Benito, B. (2018). Factors that facilitate or limit the incorporation of emerging technologies in the classroom. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(1), 38-59.
• Suárez, J., Almerich, G. Gargallo, B. y Aliaga, F. (2013). Las competencias del profesorado en TIC: estructura básica. Educación XX1, 16, 1, 39-62. DOI: 10.5944/educxx1.16.1.716.
• Suri G., & Sharma S. (2013). The impact of gender on attitude towards computer technology and E-learning: An exploratory study of Punjab University, India. International Journal of Engineering Research, 2, 132–136.
• Sussman, N., & Tyson, D. (2000). Sex and power: gender differences in computer mediated interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 381–394.
• Teo, T. (2010). Measuring the effect of gender on computer attitudes among pre-service teachers: A multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) modeling. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 227-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650741011073770
• Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.
• Terzis, V. & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
• Tsai, P.S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Elementary school students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of using PDAs in a ubiquitous learning context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (3), 297-308
• Tüfekçi Z. (2008). Gender, social capital and social network(ing) sites: Women bonding, men searching. Boston: Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place.
• Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• United Nations (2014). Measuring ICT and gender: An assessment .New York and Geneva: United Nations Retrievedfrom http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdtlstict2014d1_en.pdf.
• Vázquez-Cano, E., Meneses, E. L., & García-Garzón, E. (2017). Differences in basic digital competences between male and female university students of Social Sciences in Spain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 27
• Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51 , 1392-1404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.003
• Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), 115-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250981
• Villalba, A., González-Rivera, M. D., & Diaz-Pulido, D. (2017). Obstacles Perceived by Physical Education Teachers to Integrating ICT. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 83-92.
• Wang, Sh., Hsu, H., Campbell, T., Coster D. & Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Education Tech Research Dev, 62:637–662. DOI 10.1007
• Weiser, E. (2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: a two sample comparison. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(2), 167–178.
• Wong, K., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1190-1207.
• Zeldin, A. L. y Pajares, F. (2000). Against the Odds: Self-efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific and Technological Careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), p