How the public sector buys small thingsdirect procurement in the European Union and the opportunities for the Social Economy organizations

  1. Mendoza Jiménez, Javier 1
  2. Hernández López, Montserrat 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Revista:
CIRIEC - España. Revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa

ISSN: 0213-8093

Año de publicación: 2022

Número: 106

Páginas: 31-54

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7203/CIRIEC-E.106.21517 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: CIRIEC - España. Revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Direct (or low value) procurement can foster the participation of SMEs in public procurement. However, although they all come from the same Directive, a review of the national legislations shows that there is not a common model for this type of procedures. The thresholds in the national legislations vary without a visible explanation for it. To assess if countries can be grouped a hierarchical analysis was performed. Meanwhile, to research whether economic and social factor can influence the establishment of different conditions for direct public procurement in each Member State a regression model was applied. The results contradict the widely proclaimed intention of promoting SMEs in public procurement, since there is not direct relation between the percentage of SMEs in the economic fabric and the thresholds for the contracts. The limitations on direct procurement have probably more to do with cultural reasons and legislative traditions than with economic and social factors. Higher thresholds and specially the differentiation for, social services that present some Member States could be an opportunity for social entities. The legislative modifications of several countries point in the direction of favoring a minimum number of competitors. The study shows that noticeable divergences can be found in the way Member States regulate direct procurement, contrary to the convergency that can be observed generally in the field of public procurement.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALOMAR, M.A. & DE VISSCHER C. (2017): “Which factors can affect e-public procurement adoption by private firms? The case of Belgium”, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 15(2): 103-115. https://rb.gy/cofmr4
  • ARMOCIDA, B., FORMENT, B., USSAI, S., PALESTRA, F. & MISSON, E. (2020): “The Italian health system and the COVID-19 challenge”, The Lancet Public Health, 5(5): e253. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30074-8
  • BERNAL, R. (2020): “Incrementando la eficiencia de las licitaciones públicas con la contabilidad social”, CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 100, 239-276. DOI: 10.7203/CIRIEC-E.100.18109
  • BEUTER, R. (2020): “EU public procurement policy in the context of COVID-19”, EIPA Briefing, https://rb.gy/i7anld
  • ERAUSKIN, A., ZURBANO, M. & MARTÍNEZ, E. (2017): “Contrataciones Públicas en Economía Social: un estudio del caso de la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)”, CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 89, 55-79.
  • FOLLIOT LALLIOT, L. & YUKINS, C.R. (2020): “COVID-19: Lessons Learned in Public Procurement. Time for a New Normal?”, Concurrences, 3-2020: 46-58, https://rb.gy/sd3fkl
  • GLAS, A.H. & MICHAEL, E. (2018): “Factors that influence the success of small and medium-sized suppliers in public procurement: evidence from a centralized agency in Germany”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(1), 65-78. DOI: 10.1108/SCM-09-2016-0334
  • GOFF, R., WILK, A.R., TOLL, A.E., MCBRIDE, M.A. & KLASSEN, D.K. (2020): “Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial impacts and responses of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in the United States”, American Journal of Transplantation, 21:2100-2112. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16411
  • GUARNIERI, P. & CORRÊA GOMES, R. (2019): “Can public procurement be strategic? A future agenda proposition”, Journal of Public Procurement, 19(4), 295-321. DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-09-2018-0032
  • GUTIÉRREZ, H., NEVADO, Mª.T. & PACHE, M. (2019): “La contratación pública responsable. Diseño de indicadores de medición”, CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 96, 253-280. DOI: 10.7203/CIRIEC-E.96.12627
  • HESSAMI, Z. (2014): “Political corruption, public procurement, and budget composition: Theory and evidence from OECD countries”, European Journal of political economy, 34: 372-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.02.005
  • HÖLZL, W., BÖHEIM, M., KLIEN, M. & PICHLER, E. (2017): “Public procurement and the tension between the economically most advantageous tender and lowest price”, WIFO Studies. https://rb.gy/y2dz8w
  • KIMEU, S. (2014): “Corruption as a challenge to global ethics: the role of Transparency International”, Journal of Global Ethics, 10(2), 231-237. DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2014.935982
  • LOADER, K. (2015): “SME suppliers and the challenge of public procurement: Evidence revealed by a UK government online feedback facility”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(2), 103-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2014.12.003
  • LOVE, P. ED., LAVAGNON, I., MATTHEWS, J. & FANG, W. (2020): “Shared leadership, value and risks in large scale transport projects: Re-calibrating procurement policy for post COVID-19”, Research in Transportation Economics, 100999. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100999.
  • MARTÍNEZ FERNÁNDEZ, J.M. (2020): “Accesibilidad de la contratación pública para pymes”, Contratación administrativa práctica: revista de la contratación administrativa y de los contratistas, 165: 99-112. https://rb.gy/7omjyk.
  • MENDOZA JIMÉNEZ, J., HERNÁNDEZ LÓPEZ, M. & FRANCO ESCOBAR, S.E. (2019): “Sustainable Public Procurement: From Law to Practice”, Sustainability, 11(22), 6388. DOI: 10.3390/su11226388.
  • MCKEE, M. (2020): “England’s PPE procurement failures must never happen again”, BMJ 370:m2858. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2858.
  • MORON, D. (2021): “Sustainable public procurement as a form of support for social economy entities in Poland”, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34:4, 585-608, DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2021.1964355.
  • NEAMTU, B. & DACIAN, C.D. (2014): “Fighting corruption in public procurement: The case of Romania”. In: Gabriella M. Racca - Christopher R. Yukins (eds), Integrity and Efficiency in Sustainable Public Contracts. Balancing Corruption Concerns in Public Procurement Internationally”, Bruxelles, Bruylant, https://rb.gy/d6bbrk.
  • NEMEC, J. & GREGA, M. (2015): “Factors influencing final price of public procurement: evidence from Slovakia”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 25: 543-51. DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00768-6.
  • OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT (2019): “Public Procurement Guidelines for Goods and Services”, Version 2, Office of Government procurement. https://rb.gy/ndvc80
  • ORQUÍN SERRANO, J.J. (2019): “La Instrucción 1/2019 de la OIReScon: una visión positiva y práctica para completar el “cerco” a los contratos menores”, Consultor de los ayuntamientos y de los juzgados: Revista técnica especializada en administración local y justicia municipal, 6: 100-120, https://rb.gy/lqkp4t.
  • PASHEV, K.V. (2011): “Corruption and accession: Evidence from public procurement in Bulgaria”, Public Management Review, 13 (3): 409-32. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2011.553270.
  • PINEDA NEBOT, C. (2019): “Transparencia en la contratación pública local de los ayuntamientos del País Vasco (España)”, Revista iberoamericana de estudios municipales, 20: 85-111. DOI: 10.4067/S0719-17902019000200085.
  • PIRVU, D. & CLIPICI, E. (2016): “Social Enterprises and the EU’s Public Procurement Market”, Voluntas, 27, 1611-1637 DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9665-0.
  • PLACEK, M., SCHMIDT, M., OCHRANA, F. & PUCEK, M. (2016): “Impact of Selected Factors Regarding the Efficiency of public procurement (the Case of the Czech Republic) with an Emphasis on Decentralization”, Ekonomicky, casopis, 64 (1): 22-36. https://rb.gy/uudew4.
  • SACK, D. & SARTER, EK. (2018): “Collective bargaining, minimum wages and public procurement in Germany: Regulatory adjustments to the neoliberal drift of a coordinated market economy”, Journal of Industrial Relations, 60 (5): 669-90. DOI: 10.1177/0022185618795706.
  • SÁNCHEZ-GRAELLS, A. (2020): “Procurement in the time of COVID-19”, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 71(1), 81-87. https://rb.gy/o250rp.
  • TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL (2021): “´How CPI scores are calculated”. https://www.transparency.org/en/news/how-cpi-scores-are-calculated
  • VAN HECKE, S., FUHR, H. & WOLFS, W. (2021): “The politics of crisis management by regional and international organizations in fighting against a global pandemic: the member states at a crossroads”, International Review of Administrative Sciences. DOI: 10.1177/0020852320984516.
  • WANG, Q., ZHANG, R. & LIU, J. (2020): “Price/time/intellectual efficiency of procurement: Uncovering the related factors in Chinese public authorities”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(3), 100622. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100622.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet