The role of digital leisure in family context with adolescentsA systematic review

  1. Estefanía de los Dolores Gil García 1
  2. Pedro Francisco Aleman Ramos 2
  3. Juan Carlos Martín Quintana
  4. Javier García Santana
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

  2. 2 Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
    info

    Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01teme464

Revue:
TECHNO REVIEW: International Technology, Science and Society Review / Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad

ISSN: 2695-9933

Année de publication: 2022

Volumen: 11

Número: 2

Pages: 14

Type: Article

DOI: 10.37467/REVTECHNO.V11.3376 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: TECHNO REVIEW: International Technology, Science and Society Review / Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad

Résumé

This systematic review was carried out to provide information about the role of digital leisure in family relationships with adolescent. After conducting a search in the main databases, we present the findings of 14 articles from 2008 to 2020. Nine included articles used quantitative methodology and were theoretically based on bidirectional socialization and bottom-up technology transmission. The use of questionnaires is highlighted, and the most common sample size is parent-child dyads with adolescents in secondary education. This study evidence the importance of the role of digital leisure within the family context with adolescents and reveals a modification of family dynamics.

Références bibliographiques

  • Akard, T. F., Dietrich, M. S., Friedman, D. L., Gerhardt, C. A., Given, B., Hendricks-Ferguson, V., Hinds, P.S., Ridner S.H., Beckmann, N., & Gilmer, M. J. (2021). Improved parent–child communication following a RCT evaluating a legacy intervention for children with advanced cancer. Progress in palliative care, 29(3), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2020.1826778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2020.1826778
  • Barrera, D. & Duque, L. (2014). Family and Internet: Considerations on a Dynamic Relationship. Revista virtual Universidad Católica del norte, 41, 30-44. https://bit.ly/3Ca7Ijo
  • Callejo, M. J. & Gutiérrez, J. (2012). Máquinas de comunicar, máquinas de producir la adolescencia [Machines to communicate, machines to produce adolescence]. In Callejo, M. J., & Gutiérrez, J. (Coords.), Adolescencia entre pantallas: los jóvenes en el sistema de comunicación [Adolescence among screens: young people in the communication system] (pp.109-137). Gedisa Editorial.
  • Cheng, T. M., Chang, S. Y., & Lien, W. H. (2021). Work-leisure balance: Perceived organizational leisure support. Journal of Leisure Research, 52(2), 202-226. https://bit.ly/3LZlMAy DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1762518
  • Chiribuca, D., & Teodorescu, A. (2020). Digital Leisure in Later Life: Facebook Use among Romanian Senior Citizens. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 69, 156-175. https://bit.ly/3STkw42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.69.10
  • Churchill, S. L., Clark, V. L. P., Prochaska-Cue, K., Creswell, J. W., & Ontai-Grzebik, L. (2007). How rural low-income families have fun: A grounded theory study. Journal of Leisure, 39, 271–294. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950108
  • Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320–334. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
  • Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents' digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of communication, 64(1), 103-124. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12067
  • Correa, T. (2015). The power of youth: How the bottom-up technology transmission from children to parents is related to digital (in) equality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 24. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2393/1365
  • Correa, T. (2016). Acquiring a new technology at home: A parent-child study about youths’ influence on digital media adoption in a family. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 123-139. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127238
  • Correa, T., Straubhaar, J. D., Chen, W., & Spence, J. (2015). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents’ usage of the Internet. New Media & Society, 17(4), 483-500. https://www.doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444813506975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813506975
  • Council of Europe (2006). Recommendation Rec (2006)19 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on policy to support positive parenting. https://bit.ly/2vMQXIw
  • Dahl, R., Suleiman, A., Luna, B., Choudhury, S., Noble, K., Lupien, S. J., Ward, E., Tang, Y., & Uncapher, M. R. (2017). The Adolescent Brain: A second window to opportunity. Unicef for every child. http://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/5746
  • Earley, V., Fairbrother, H., & Curtis, P. (2019). Displaying good fathering through the construction of physical activity as intimate practice. Families, Relationships and Societies, 8(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674318X15213675247903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204674318X15213675247903
  • Eynon, R., & Helsper, E. (2015). Family dynamics and Internet use in Britain: What role do children play in adults' engagement with the Internet? Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 156-171. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.942344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.942344
  • Galperin, H., & Arcidiacono, M. (2019). Learning from or leaning on? The impact of children on Internet use by adults. New Media & Society, 21(2), 483-506. https://bit.ly/3LYCIas DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799996
  • Gutiérrez, R., Díaz, K. Y., & Román, R. P. (2016). El concepto de familia en México: una revisión desde la mirada antropológica y demográfica. Ciencia ergo-sum, Revista científica Multidisciplinaria de Prospectiva, 23(3), 219-228. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10448076002
  • Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society, 22(4), 195–203. https://bit.ly/3rogZ1Y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600791325
  • Heintzman, P. (2013). Defining leisure. In R. McCarville, & K. MacKay (Eds.), Leisure for Canadians, (2nd ed., pp. 3-14). Venture Publishing, Inc.
  • Hernando, Á., Oliva, A., & Pertegal, M. Á. (2013). Gender differences in adolescents’ lifestyles. Psychosocial intervention, 22(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2013a3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/in2013a3
  • Huayamave, K. G., Benavides, B. B., & Sangacha, M. M. (2019). Estudio del rol de los padres de familia en la vida emocional de los hijos. Apuntes Universitarios. Revista de Investigación, 9(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v9i2.360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v9i2.157
  • Hupe, M. (2019). EndNote X9. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 16(3-4), 117-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2019.1691963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2019.1691963
  • Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Bittanti, M., Herr Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., & Robinson, L. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8519.001.0001
  • Katz, V. (2014). Children as brokers of their immigrant families’ health-care connections. Social Problem, 61(2), 194–215. https://www.doi.org/10.1525/sp.2014.12026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2014.12026
  • Katz, V. S. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families with the community. Journal of Children and Media, 4(3), 28–315. https://bit.ly/3y9Fy6G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2010.486136
  • Khoo, E. T., Cheok, A. D., Nguyen, T. H. D. & Pan, Z. (2008). Age invaders: social and physical inter-generational mixed reality family entertainment. Virtual Reality, 12(1), 3-16. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10055-008-0083-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-008-0083-0
  • Livingstone, S. (2002). Young People and New Media: Childhood and the Changing Media Environment. SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219522
  • López, J., De Francisco, L. & García, E. (2015). The nature of leisure revisited: An interpretation of digital leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 79-101. https://bit.ly/3rrgoga DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950352
  • López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L. & García-Álvarez, E. (2017). Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1309741. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1309741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1309741
  • Martelo, S., Ceballos, L. & Mejía-Gil, M. (2020). Estilos de Vida en cuanto al Ocio de las Parejas Sin Hijos vs. Nido Lleno. Estudios de Administración, 27(1), 49-68. https://bit.ly/3RqhfbD DOI: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0816.2020.56971
  • Martín, J. C., Alemán, J., Calcines, M. A. & Izquierdo, D. (2018). Analysis of family shared leisure time in early childhood and their relation with parental competencies. Early Child Development and Care, 188(11), 1580-1592. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1499097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1499097
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Physical therapy, 89(9), 873-880. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Nelissen, S., & Van den Bulck, J. (2018). When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 375-387. https://bit.ly/3STkV6y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281993
  • Nelissen, S., Kuczynski, L., Coenen, L., & Van den Bulck, J. (2019). Bidirectional socialization: an actor-partner interdependence model of Internet self-efficacy and digital media influence between parents and children. Communication Research, 46(8), 1145-1170. https://bit.ly/3e0Bf6R DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219852857
  • Nimrod, G., & Adoni, H. (2012). Conceptualizing E-leisure. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 35(1), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2012.10707834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2012.10707834
  • Padilla‐Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high‐speed family connection: associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00710.x
  • Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(160). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
  • Paus-Hasebrink, I., Bauwens, J., Dürager, A. E., & Ponte, C. (2013). Exploring types of parent–child relationship and Internet use across Europe. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 114-132. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.739807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.739807
  • Ponnet, K., Van Leeuwen, K., Wouters, E., & Mortelmans, D. (2015). A family system approach to investigate family-based pathways between financial stress and adolescent problem behaviour. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25, 765–780. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12171
  • Quintana, J. C. M., & López, M. J. R. (2013). La promoción de la parentalidad positiva [Promoting positive parenting]. Educação, Ciência e Cultura, 18(1), 77-88. https://bit.ly/3fCm44m
  • Rodrigo, M. J., & Palacios, J. (1998). Familia y desarrollo humano. Alianza.
  • Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223-228. https://bit.ly/3Ssw9iK DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
  • Spanish National Statistics Institute. (2021). Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares [Survey on Equipment and Use of ICTs in Households]. https://www.ine.es/prensa/tich_2021.pdf
  • Statistical Office of the European Communities. (2021). Digital economy and society statistics - households and individuals. https://bit.ly/3CC3gLL
  • Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Emmery, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2017). A Factorial Validation of Parental Mediation Strategies with Regard to Internet Use. Psychologica Belgica, 57(2), 93–111. https://www.doi.org/10.5334/pb.372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.372
  • Torrecillas-Lacave, T., Vázquez-Barrio, T., & Monteagudo-Barandalla, L. (2017). The perception of parents about the digital empowerment of family in hyperconnected households. El profesional de la información, 26(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.10
  • Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2005). The child effect in media and communication research: A call to arms and an agenda for research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 29(1), 35-48. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2005.11679043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2005.11679043
  • Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2011). Digital skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 893–911. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774
  • Van Dijck, J. (2016). La cultura de la conectividad: una historia crítica de las redes sociales. Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
  • Vaquero, E. (2020). Parentalidad digital. STUDIUM EDUCATIONIS-Rivista semestrale per le professioni educative, 3, 203-214. https://doi.org/10.7346/SE-032020-14
  • Wang, Y. (2020). Parent–child role reversal in ICT domestication: media brokering activities and emotional labours of Chinese “study mothers” in Singapore. Journal of Children and Media, 1-18. https://ww.doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1725900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1725900
  • We Are Social & Hootsuite (2015). Digital 2015: Global overview report. https://bit.ly/3CsVIe7
  • We Are Social & Hootsuite. (2021). Digital 2021: Global overview report. https://bit.ly/3RB1zCi
  • Winocur, R. (2009) Robinson Crusoe ya tiene celular: la conexión como espacio de control de la incertidumbre [Robinson Crusoe already has a cell phone: connection as a space for the control of uncertainty]. Siglo XXI editores.
  • Wood, L., Hoeber, O., Snelgrove, R., & Hoeber, L. (2019). Computer science meets digital leisure: Multiple perspectives on social media and eSport collaborations. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(5), 425-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1594466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1594466
  • Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., Navarro, R., & Elche, M. (2018). Parents, children and Internet use. Family socialization on the Internet. Universitas Psychologica, 17(2), 88-100. https://bit.ly/3EcjbS7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-2.phis
  • Zerle-Elsäßer, C., Schüller, S., Langmeyer, A. N., Naab T., & Heuberger, S. (2021). On solitary internet parents and community-oriented TV families. A typology of digital media usage in families. Journal for Sociology of Education and Socialization, 41(4), 413-431.