Evaluation of programmes under the positive parenting initiative in Spainintroduction to the special issue

  1. María J. Rodrigo 1
  2. Victoria Hidalgo 2
  3. Sonia Byrne 1
  4. Isabel M. Bernedo 3
  5. Jiménez García, Lucía
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife
  2. 2 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  3. 3 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Psicología educativa

ISSN: 1135-755X

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 29

Número: 1

Páginas: 1-13

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5093/PSED2022A5 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicología educativa

Resumen

La ciencia de la prevención avala los estándares de evidencia relativos a la investigación en evaluación de programas. Sin embargo, hay aún controversia en cuanto a su aplicación a la prestación de apoyo familiar bajo la iniciativa europea de la parentalidad positiva. El número especial tiene por objeto mapear la extensión de los programas preventivos de apoyo familiar en España y comparar la calidad de las pruebas con los estándares de prevención de la Red Europea de Apoyo Familiar. Los miembros de la Red Española de Apoyo Familiar, formada por entidades de varios sectores, han identificado 57 programas que se utilizan en España y cumplimentado una ficha de evaluación formativa para cada programa. Los artículos de este número analizan los resultados de cuatro aspectos principales de todos los programas: descripción, implementación, evaluación e impacto/sostenibilidad. Los resultados describen el panorama y variedad del apoyo brindado y la calidad de los programas en España, proporcionando orientación sobre mejora y abordando los desafíos para reforzar la garantía de calidad en los servicios para la infancia, adolescencia y familias.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acquah, D., & Thévenon, O. (2020). Delivering evidence based services for all vulnerable families. A review of main policy issues. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 243. https://doi.org/10.1787/1bb808f2-en
  • Almeida, A., Cruz, O., Canário, A. C., Milani, P., & Serbati, S. (2022).Evidence- based family and parenting support evaluation strategies: The position of EurofamNet. EurofamNet.
  • Asmussen, K. (2011). The evidence-based parenting practitioner’s handbook. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815731
  • Asmussen, K., & Brims, L. (2018). What works to enhance the effectiveness of the healthy child programme: An evidence update. Early Intervention Foundation.
  • Axford, N., Elliott, D. S., & Little, M. (2012). Blueprints for Europe: Promoting evidence-based programs in children’s services. Psychosocial Intervention, 21(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2012a11
  • Barrera, M., Jr., Berkel, C., & Castro, F. G. (2017). Directions for the advancement of culturally adapted preventive interventions: Local adaptations, engagement, and sustainability. Prevention Science, 18(6), 640-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0705-9
  • Canavan, J., Pinkerton, J., & Dolan, P. (2016). Understanding family support. Policy, practice and theory. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Casillas, K. L., Fauchier, A., Derkash, B. T., & Garrido, E. F. (2016). Implementation of evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.009
  • Council of Europe. (2006). Recommendation No. R (2006) 19 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on policy to support positive parenting (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 December 2006 at the 983rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies). http://rm.coe.int/native/09000016805d6dda
  • Council of Europe. (2021). Recommendation (EU) 2021/1004 of 14 June 2021 establishing a European child guarantee. Official Journal (L 223), 14-23. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021H1004&from=EN
  • Daly, M. (2007). Parenting in contemporary Europe: A positive approach. Council of Europe.
  • Daly, M. (2013). Parenting support policies in Europe. Families, Relationships and Societies, 2(2), 159-74. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1409.6160%20
  • Daly, M. (2015). Introduction: Parenting support in European countries: a complex development in social policy. Social Policy and Society, 14(4), 593-595. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746415000317%20
  • Dolan, P., Pinkerton, J., & Canavan, J. (2006). Family support from description to reflection. In Dolan, P., Canavan, J., & Ponkerton, J. (Eds.), Family support as reflective practice (pp. 11-26). Jessica Kingsley.
  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(2), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
  • European Commission. (2013). Commission Recommendation of 20 February 2013 investing in children: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage. Official Journal (L 59), 5-16. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2013/112/oj
  • European Family Support Network. (2020a). EurofamNet principles. EurofamNet. https://eurofamnet.eu/about/documents
  • European Family Support Network. (2020b). Foundation document for the European Family Support Network. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 21 (2), 5-7. https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/1407/1456
  • European Platform for Investing in Children. (n.d.). Practices that work. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1250&langId=en
  • Fives, A., Canavan, J., & Dolan, P. (2017). Evaluation study design – a pluralist approach to evidence. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25 (1), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2016.1266227
  • Fixsen, D. L., Blasé, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335549
  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, F. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of literature.University of South Florida. The National Implementation Research Network.
  • Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., ...& Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6 (3), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y
  • Frost, N., Abbott, S., & Race, T. (2015). Family support: Prevention, early intervention and early help. Polity Press.
  • Garcia A. R., DeNard, C., Morones, S. M., & Eldeeb, N. (2019). Mitigating barriers to implementing evidence-based interventions in child welfare: Lessons learned from scholars and agency directors. Child and Youth Services Review, 100, 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.005
  • Gordon, R. (1987). An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports, 98 (2), 107-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/e659532007-006
  • Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: next generation. Prevention Science, 16 (7), 893-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x
  • Hidalgo, V., Pérez-Padilla, J., Sánchez, J., Ayala-Nunes, L., Maya, J., Grimaldi, V., & Menéndez, S. (2018). An analysis of different resources and programmes supporting at-risk families in Spain, Early Child Development and Care, 188 (11), 1528-1539. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1491560
  • Jiménez, L., Canavan, J., Abela, A., Boskovic, B., Byrne, S., Churchill, H., Devaney, C., Ene, T., Iliadou, V., Karpava, S., Pecnik, N., & Zegarac, N. in behalf of EurofamNet (2021, 7 de julio). The European Family Support Network. A bottom-up, evidence-based and multi-disciplinary Action [Comunicación]. World Education Research Association - Focal Meeting 2020+1, Santiago de Compostela, España.
  • Kerner, J. F., & Hall, K. L. (2009). Research dissemination and diffusion. Translation within science and society. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049731509335585
  • Kilburn, M. R. y Mattox, T. (2016). Using evidence to strengthen policies for investing in children. RAND Corporation.
  • Mallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(3), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711342
  • McGregor, C., Canavan, J., & Gabhainn, S. N. (2020). A critical consideration of the relationship between professional and public understandings of family support: Towards greater public awareness and discursive coherence in concept and delivery. Children and Youth Services Review, 113 (C), Article 104952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104952
  • Molinuevo, D. (2013). Parenting support in Europe. Eurofound. National Academy for Parenting Practitioners. (2008). Parenting Programme Evaluation Tool (PPET). https://lemosandcrane.co.uk/ resources/NAPP%20-%20PPET.pdf
  • Özdemir, M., Vastamäki, S., Leijten, P., & Sampaio, F. (in press).The European Family Support Network (EurofamNet) quality standards for family support programs. EurofamNet.
  • Proctor, K. B., & Brestan-Knight, E. (2016). Evaluating the use of assessment paradigms for preventive interventions: A review of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program. Children and Youth Services Review, 62, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.018
  • Rodrigo, M. J. (2016). Quality of implementation in evidence-based positive parenting programs in Spain: Introduction to the special issue. Psychosocial Intervention, 25 (2), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2016.02.004
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Amorós, P., Arranz, E., Hidalgo, M. V., Máiquez, M. L, Martín, J. C., Martinez, R. A., & Ochaita, E., (2015). Guía de buenas prácticas en parentalidad positiva. Un recurso para apoyar la práctica profesional con familias. Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias (FEMP). http://familiasenpositivo.org
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Arranz, E., Balsells, M. A., Hidalgo, M. V., Máiquez, M. L, Martín, J. C., Martinez, R. A., Ochaita, E., & Manzano, A. (2021). Guía de competencias interprofesionales en parentalidad positive. Un recurso para fortalecer y consolidar las buenas prácticas en los servicios de infancia, adolescencia y familias. Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias (FEMP). http://familiasenpositivo.org
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Byrne, S., & Álvarez, M. (2016). Interventions to promote positive parenting in Spain. In M. Israelashvili & J. L. Romano (Eds), Cambridge handbook of international prevention science (pp. 929-956). Cambridge University Press.
  • Rodrigo, M. J., Máiquez, M. L., Martín Quintana, J. C., Byrne, S., & Rodríguez Ruiz, B. (2015). Manual práctico de parentalidad positiva. Síntesis. Scott, S. (2010). National dissemination of effective parenting programmes to improve child outcomes. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 196 (1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.067728
  • Small, S. A., Cooney, S. M., & O’Connor, C. (2009). Evidence-informed program improvement: Using principles of effectiveness to enhance the quality and impact of family-based prevention programs. Family Relations, 58(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00530.x
  • Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Greenberg, M., Leaf, P., Brown, C. H., Fagan, A., Catalano, R. F., Pentz, M. A., Sloboda, Z., Hawkins, J. D., & Society for Prevention Research Type 2 Translational Task Force Members and Contributing Authors (2013). Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: The translation science to population impact (TSci impact) framework. PreventionScience, 14(4), 319-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0362-6
  • Thévenon, O. (2020). Family support services across the OECD. DELSA/ ELSA/WP1/RD(2020)2. Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child, Treaty Series, 1577, 3.
  • Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. Sage.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet