¿Cuán humano eres tú?La escala de humanidad

  1. María-Dolores Morera
  2. Naira Delgado
  3. María-Nieves Quiles
  4. Rocío Martínez
  5. Stephany Hess
Revista:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748,  1579-3680

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 38

Número: 1

Páginas: 122-156

Tipo: Artículo

SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85146246493 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Resumen

El principal objetivo de esta investigación fue desarrollar una nueva medida centrada en un conjunto de creencias proposicionales vinculadas con lo que las personas consideran que constituye lo humano, con el fin de evaluar expresiones directas y globales de deshumanización. El Estudio 1 (N = 277) tuvo por objeto desarrollar una escala de 13 ítems (α = .94) y explorar su dimensionalidad (EFA). El Estudio 2 (N = 296) tuvo por objeto confirmar su estructura unidimensional y analizar la relación entre la escala de humanidad (HS) y otras variables relevantes, como un termómetro afectivo, una escala de prejuicio sutil y manifiesto y una escala de estatus social percibido. En el Estudio 3 (N = 290), se comparó la HS con otras medidas de deshumanización en la predicción de la distancia social. Los resultados muestran que el endogrupo fue percibido como el grupo más humano, mientras que los demás se distribuían por todo el espectro de la dimensión ‘humanidad’. Asimismo, se observó una relación moderada pero significativa entre las puntuaciones en la escala de humanidad y las demás medidas y fue el mejor predictor de la distancia social. Esta investigación proporciona una forma nueva y fácil de medir la deshumanización en la percepción social cotidiana.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison Wesley.
  • Andrighetto, L., Baldissarri, C., Lattanzio, S., Loughnan, S., & Volpato, C. (2014). Human-itarian aid? Two forms of dehumanization and willingness to help after natural disasters. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(3), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12066
  • Bain, P. G., Vaes, J., & Leyens, J. P. (2014). Advances in understanding humanness and dehumanization. In P. G. Bain, J. Vaes, & J. P. Leyens (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 1–9). Psychology Press.
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
  • Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., & Haslam, N. (2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS ONE, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842
  • Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022
  • Betancor, V., Ariño, E., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., & Delgado, N. (2016). Do they feel the same as us? The infrahumanization of individuals with down syndrome. Psicothema, 28(3), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.10
  • Bogardus, E. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265–271.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
  • Bruneau, E., Jacoby, N., Kteily, N., & Saxe, R. (2018). Denying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147 (7), 1078–1093. Supplemental https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000417.supp
  • Bruneau, E., Kteily, N., & Laustsen, L. (2018). The unique effects of blatant dehumanization on attitudes and behavior towards Muslim refugees during the European ‘refugee crisis’ across four countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(5), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2357
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Rock, M. S., & Norton, M. I. (2007). Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207071344
  • De Houwer, J., Van Dessel, P., & Moran, T. (2021). Attitudes as propositional representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.003
  • Delgado, N., Betancor, V., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., & Ariño, E. (2012). Si los exogrupos son solidarios, entonces son humanos. El efecto de un contexto prosocial en la infrahumanización. Revista de Psicología Social, 27(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347412800337889
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
  • Gawronski, B., Brannon, S. M., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2017). The associative-propositional duality in the representation, formation, and expression of attitudes. In R. Deutsch, B. Gawronski, & W. Hofmann (Eds.), Reflective and impulsive determinants of human behavior (pp. 103–118). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292
  • Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475
  • Greenhalgh, E. M., & Watt, S. E. (2015). Preference for consistency and value dissimilarities in dehumanization and prejudice toward asylum seekers in Australia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2066
  • Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
  • Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and Infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
  • Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2012). Prejudice and dehumanization. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.), Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 89–104). Cambridge University Press.
  • Haslam, N., & Stratemeyer, M. (2016). Recent research on dehumanization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.009
  • Hernández-Cabrera, J. A. (2021). ULL-R-Toolbox. shorturl.at/gzDIK https://sites.google.com/site/ullrtoolbox/novedades?authuser=0
  • Kofta, M., Baran, T., & Tarnowska, M. (2014). Dehumanization as a denial of human potentials: The naive theory of humanity perspective. In P. G. Bain, J. Vaes, & J. Leyens (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 256–275). Psychology Press.
  • Kteily, N., & Bruneau, E. (2017). Backlash: The politics and real-world consequences of minority group dehumanization. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216675334
  • Kteily, N., Bruneau, E., Waytz, A., & Cotterill, S. (2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 109(5), 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000048.supp
  • Kteily, N. S., & Landry, A. P. (2022). Dehumanization: Trends, insights, and challenges. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.12.003
  • Leidner, B., Castano, E., & Ginges, J. (2013). Dehumanization, retributive and restorative justice, and aggressive versus diplomatic intergroup conflict resolution strategies. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472208
  • Leyens, J., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M., Vaes, J., & Demoulin, S. (2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.50
  • Martínez, R., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Moya, M. (2012). Are they animals or machines? Measuring dehumanization. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1110–1122. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39401
  • Morera, M. D., Quiles, M. N., Correa, A. D., Delgado, N., & Leyens, J. (2018). Perception of mind and dehumanization: Human, animal, or machine? International Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12375
  • Morera, M. D., Quiles, M. N., & González-Méndez, R. (2022). Integrating dehumanization and attachment in the prediction of teen dating violence perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3–4), 1939–1962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520933042
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
  • Sainz, M., Loughnan, S., Martínez, R., Moya, M., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020). Dehumanization of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups decreases support for welfare policies via perceived wastefulness. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.414
  • Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.364
  • Viki, T., Osgood, D., & Phillips, S. (2013). Dehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.006
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet