Revisión crítica de las principales influencias sobre el juego motor de tríada

Referencias bibliográficas

• Almond, L. (1983) Games making. Bulletin of Physical Education, 19(1), 32–35.
• André, M., & Hastie, P. (2018). Comparing teaching approaches in two student-designed games units. European Physical Education Review, 24(2), 225–239. doi:10.1177/1356336x16681955
• Araújo, D., Silva, P., & Ramos, J. P. (2014). Affordance-based decisions guide team synergies during match performance. Research in Physical Education, Sport & Health, 3(1), 19–26. http://www.pesh.mk/PDF/Vol_3_No_1/3.pdf
• Barbut, M. (1967). Jeux et mathematiques. En Roger Caillois (dir). Jeux et Sports, Encyclopedie de la Pleiade, 23. Paris: Gallimard, 826-864.
• Binmore, K. (2017). Teoría de juegos. Una breve introducción. Madrid: Alianza.
• Brasó, J., & Torrebadella, X. (2020). El juego del cornerball, un pre-texto del pasado para crear debate en la educación física del presente. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 37, 810-819. doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.67484
• Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1), 5–8.
• Bunker, D., Thorpe, R., & Almond, L. (1986). Rethinking games teaching. Loughborough: University of Technology. www.tgfu.org
• Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399. http://dex.doi.org/10.1086/421787
• Butler, J. (2013). Stages for Children Inventing Games. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(4), 48–53. doi:10.1080/07303084.2013.773828
• Caplow, T. (1956). A theory of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review, 21(4), 489-493. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2088718
• Caplow, T. (1959). Further development of a theory of coalitions in the triad. American Journal of Sociology, 64(5), 488-493. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2773436
• Caplow, T. (1968). Two against one: Coalitions in triads. Prentice-Hall.
• Casey, A., & Hastie, P. A. (2011). Students and teacher responses to a unit of student-designed games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 16(3), 295–312. doi:10.1080/17408989.2010. 535253
• Casey, A., Hastie, P. A., & Rovegno, I. (2011). Student learning during a unit of student-designed games. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 16(4), 331-350. doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.557654
• Cox, J. C., Friedman, D., & Sadiraj, V. (2008). Revealed Altruism. Econometrica, 76(1), 31-69.
• Cox, R.L. (1988). Games-making: Principles and procedures. Scottish Journal of Physical Education, 16(2),14-16.
• Curtner-Smith, M. D. (1996). Teaching for Understanding: Using Games Invention with Elementary Children. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(3), 33–37. doi:10.1080/07303084.1996.10607218
• Doak, L. (2020). Realising the ‘right to play’ in the special school playground. International Journal of Play, 9(4), 414-438. doi: 10.1080/21594937.2020.1843805
• Faust, K. (2010). A Puzzle Concerning Triads in Networks: Transitivity and Homophily in Strong-Tie Relations. Social Networks, 22, 221-233. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.004
• Flament, Cl. (1977). Redes de Comunicación y Estructuras de Grupo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Vision.
• Gamson, W. (1961). An experimental test of theory of coalitions formation. American Sociological Review, 26(4), 565-573. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2090255
• García-López, L.M., Contreras, O., Penney, D. & Chandler, T. (2009). The role of transfer in games teaching: implications for the development of the sports curriculum. European Physical Education Review, 15(1), 47-63. doi: 10.1177/1356336X09105211.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Gréhaigne, J.F., & Godbout, P. (2014). Dynamic systems theory and team sport coaching. Quest, 66(1), 96–116. doi:10.1080/00336297.2013.814577
• Godbout, P., & Gréhaigne, J. F. (2020). Revisiting the Tactical-Decision Learning Model. Quest, 72(4), 430-447.
• Gómez, Á., Sánchez, B.J., Cifo, M.I., & Gómez-Mármol, A. (2022). Effects of a hybrid teaching model (SEM + TGfU) and the model of personal and social responsibility on sportsmanship and enjoyment in 4° Secondary and 1° Bachillerato students. Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación, (43), 550-559.
• Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
• Guillemard, G., Marchal, J. C., Parent, M., Parlebas, P. & Schmitt, A. (1988). Las cuatro esquinas de los juegos. Lérida: Agonos.
• Hartley, J. (2017, October 23). Sport of the Week – Three-sided Football [Audio podcast episode]. In That One Sports Show.
• https://thatonesportsshow.com/podcast/sport-of-the-week-three-sided-football/
• Hastie, P., & André, M. (2012). Game appreciation through student designed games and game equipment. International Journal of Play, 1(2), 165-183. doi: 10.1080/21594937.2012.698460
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107-112. doi:10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
• Hopper, T. (1998). Teaching games for understanding using progressive principles of play. CAHPERD, 64(3), 4-7.
• Hopper, T. (2011). Game-as-teacher: Modification by adaptation in learning through game-play. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(2), 3-21. doi: 10.1080/18377122.2011.9730348
• Jorn, A. (2015/1962). The natural order (pp.133-175). On the triolectical method in its applications in general situlogy (pp. 238-249). In M. Bolt & J. Jacobsen, Cosmonauts of the future. Texts from the Situonist Movement in Scandinavian and Elsewhere Nebula-Autonomedia. https://situationistlibrary.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/jakobson cosmonautsofthefuture-web.pdf
• Johnson, I. L., & Walker, E. R. (2016). Teaching games for understanding: Building a physically literate individual. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(6), 47-49. doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2016.1192922
• Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts, and findings. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Kuhn, G. (2011). Soccer vs. the state: Tackling football and radical politics. Oakland: PM Press.
• Liebrand, W. B. G. (1984). The effect of social motives, communication and group sizes on behavior in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14(3), 239-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420140302
• Lomnitz, C. (2005). Sobre reciprocidad negativa. Revista de Antropología Social, 14, 311-339. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RASO/article/view/RASO0505110311A/9493
• Luhmann, N. (1990). Sociedad y sistema: la ambición de la teoría. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Luhmann, N. (1998). Complejidad y modernidad, de la unidad a la diferencia. Madrid: Trotta.
• Marrero, A., Castaño, M. & Romero, L. (1995). El poder en las organizaciones. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: CIES. https://mdc.ulpgc.es/utils/getfile/collection/MDC/id/1463/filename/1469.pdf
• Martínez-Santos, R. (2020). Book Review: La paradoja de jugar en tríada. El juego motor en tríada. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 612587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612587
• McMillan, C., & Felmlee, D. (2020). Beyond Dyads and Triads: A Comparison of Tetrads in Twenty Social Networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 0190272520944151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272520944151
• Méndez-Giménez, A. M. (2011). The Process of Creation of Games of Hitting and Fielding by means of Hybridization of Teaching Model. Ágora para la Educación Física y el Deporte, 13(1), 55-85. http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/23712
• Morin, E. (1995). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Barcelona: Gedisa.
• Nash, J. (1951). Non-cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics Journal, 54(2), 286-295. http://www.cs.uu.nl/docs/vakken/msagi/Nash51.pdf
• Navarro, V. (1995). Estudio de conductas infantiles en un juego de reglas. Análisis de la estructura de juego, edad y género. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2016
• Navarro-Adelantado, V. (1989). El mantenimiento de un juego: la pelotamano de Lanzarote. Stadion, 15(1), 111-138.
• Navarro-Adelantado, V. (2002). El afán de jugar. Teoría y práctica de los juegos motores. Barcelona: INDE.
• Navarro, V. (2006). 40 años de propuestas de juegos motores en Educación Física. Comparativa entre las propuestas tradicionales y modernas de libros-manuales de juegos motores. Revista de Educación, 340, 787-808. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:6cafb7d9-54ce-406a-9c6b-2219f8be0ec5/re34029-pdf.pdf
• Navarro-Adelantado, V. (2010). Claves de transformación de los juegos de tablero en juegos motores. Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes, (389), 63. https://www.reefd.es/index.php/reefd/article/view/276
• Navarro-Adelantado, V., & Pic, M. (2016). Regulating co-alliance in a triad motor game. Ágora para la educación física y el deporte, 18(3), 276-288. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20173048983
• Navarro-Adelantado, V., & Pic, M. (2020). La apertura de la regla en los juegos triádicos y la paradoja en déficit de conectividad. Ágora para la Educación Física y el Deporte, 22(1), 320-354. doi.org/10.24197/aefd.0.2020.320-354
• Navarro-Adelantado, V., & Pic, M. (2021). Gameplay Clues for Motor Interactions in a Triad Game. International Journal of Medicine and Science of Physical Activity and Sport. 21(82), 355–374. doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2021.82.010
• Oboeuf, A., Collard, L., Pruvost, A., & Lech, A. (2009). La prévisibilité au service de l’imprévisibilité. Le « code secret » du football. Réseaux 156, 241-270. doi:10.3917/res.156.0241.
• Oboeuf, A., Hanneton, S., Buffet, J., Fantoni, C., & Labiadh, L. (2020). Influence of traditional sporting games on the development of creative skills in team sports. The case of football. Frontiers in Psychology,11, 611803 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611803
• Parlebas, P. (1974). Analyse mathématique élémentaire d’un jeu sportif. Mathématique et Sciences Humaines, 47, 5-35. http://www.numdam.org/article/MSH_1974__47__5_0.pdf
• Parlebas, P. (1981). Contribution à un lexique commenté de l’action motrice. Paris: INSEP.
• Parlebas, P. (1988). Elementos de Sociología del Deporte. Málaga: Unisport.
• Parlebas, P. (2005a). Modélisation dans les jeux et les sports. Mathematiques et Sciences Humaines, 170(2), 11-45. http://msh.revues.org/2968
• Parlebas, P. (2005b). Mathematisation elementaire de l’action dans les jeux sportifs. Mathematiques et Sciences Humaines, 170(2), 95-117. http://journals.openedition.org/msh/2952
• Parlebas, P. (2010). Modélisation mathematique, jeux sportifs et sciences socials. Mathematiques et Sciences Humaines, 191(3), 33-50. http://msh.revues.org/11861
• Parlebas, P. (2011). Trio maudit ou triade feconde? Le cas du jeu pierre-feuille-ciseaux. Mathematiques et Sciences Humaines, 196(4), 5-25. http://journals.openedition.org/msh/12107
• Parlebas, P. (2020). The Universals of Games and Sports. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 593877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593877
• Pic, M., & Navarro-Adelantado, V. (2017). Triad communication and specificity of motor games. International Journal of Medicine and Science of Physical Activity and Sport. 17(67), 523–539. doi:10.15366/rimcafd2017.67.009.
• Pic, M., Navarro-Adelantado, V., & Jonsson, G. K. (2018). Detection of Ludic Patterns in Two Triadic Motor Games and Differences in Decision Complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02259
• Pic, M., & Navarro, V. (2019). La paradoja de jugar en tríada. El juego motor en tríada. Madrid: Bubok.
• https://www.bubok.es/libros/261016/La-paradoja-de-jugar-en-triada-El-juego-motor-en-triada
• Pic, M., Navarro-Adelantado, V., & Jonsson, G. (2020). Gender Differences in Strategic Behavior in a Triadic Persecution Motor Game Identified Through an Observational Methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00109.
• Pic, M., Navarro-Adelantado, V., & Jonsson, G. K. (2021). Exploring playful asymmetries for gender-related decision-making through T-pattern analysis. Physiology & Behavior, 236, 113421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113421.
• Pollock, B. (2021). Three-sided football: DIY football and social transformationalism. Sport, Education and Society, 26(9), 1026-1040.
• doi: 10.1080/13573322.2021.1944080
• Práxedes, A., González, R., del Villar, F., & Gil-Arias, A. (2021). Combining Physical Education and unstructured practice during school recess to improve the studen. Retos, 41, 502-511. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.83455
• Raitio, E. (2019). Triads as a System of Collabo-Ration, Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/250168296.pdf
• Rovegno, I., & D. Bandhauer. (1994). Child-designed games – Experience changes teachers’ conceptions. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance 65(6), 60 –63. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1994.10606944
• Roy, B. Préface in Ph.Vincke (1989). L ́aide multicritère à la decisión. Bruxelles: Editions de l ́Universite de Bruxelles-Editions Ellipses, 13.
• Sánchez, R. (2017). Innovaciones en la enseñanza comprensiva del deporte en Educación Física: explorando los desafíos estratégicos de los juegos en tríada y la planificación por niveles de complejidad táctica. University of León (Spain). http://extensionuniversitaria.unileon.es/euniversitaria/curso.aspx?id=1149
• Sánchez, R. (2000). Del duelo a la paradoja: una propuesta de enseñanza de los juegos tradicionales infantiles basada en la comunicación motriz. III Jornades d’Intercanvi d’Experiències d’Educació Física. Valencia: CEFIRE, 173-189.
• Seifert, L., Komar, J., Barbosa, T., Toussaint, H., Millet, G., & Davids, K. (2014). Coordination pattern variability provides functional adaptations to constraints in swimming performance. Sports Medicine, 44(10), 1333–45. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0210-x
• Shalins, M. (1965). On the sociology of primitive exchange. In Max Gluckman and Eggan, F. (eds.) The relevance of models for social anthropology. London: Tavistock Publications (pp.139-239). https://1lib.eu/book/846469/427b63?regionChanged
• Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. In Kurt Wolff (ed). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press-Mcmillan Publisher Company. https://archive.org/details/sociologyofgeorg030082mbp
• Thorpe, R., Bunker, D., & Almond, L. (1984). A change in focus for the teaching of games. In M. Pieron & G. Graham (Eds.), Sport Pedagogy: Olympic Scientific Congress Proceedings, Vol. 6. Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
• Three sided football. In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzbnKQKszm4
• Trivedi, R., & Zha, H. (2020). Learning Strategic Network Emergence Games. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/4bb236de7787ceedafdff83bb8ea4710-Paper.pdf
• Torrents, C., Ensenyat, A., Ric, A., Mateu, M., & Hristovski, R. (2018). Free play with certain equipment constrains the emergence of exploratory behavior and physical activity in preschoolers. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 22(4), 509-533. https://europepmc.org/article/med/30336797
• Varea, V. (2018). Exploring play in school recess and physical education classes. European Physical Education Review, 24(2), 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16679932
• Von Neumann, J. & Morgerstern, O. (1944). The theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
• Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of a model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(1), 28-33. doi: 10.1080/07303084.1996.10607176
• Weaver, R. G., Webster, C., & Beets, M. W. (2013). Let us play: maximizing physical activity in physical education. Strategies, 26(6), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2013.839518