Continuidad de vínculos con el ser querido fallecido y los cuidados de Enfermería de Salud Mental según el Modelo Tidal

  1. Daniel Martínez-Esquivel 1
  2. Derby Muñoz-Rojas 2
  3. Alfonso Miguel García-Hernández 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

  2. 2 Universidad de Costa Rica
    info

    Universidad de Costa Rica

    San José, Costa Rica

    ROR https://ror.org/02yzgww51

Revista:
Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

ISSN: 1132-1296

Any de publicació: 2023

Volum: 32

Número: 2

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.58807/INDEXENFERM20235690 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Index de enfermería: información bibliográfica, investigación y humanidades

Resum

The objective is to analyze how the Tidal Model favors the reconstruction of meanings in grief as a continuing bond. Results: Grief is a complex process that has natural and constructed components. Sometimes, bereaved people validate the continuing bonds with the deceased person through the organization of self-narratives. The management of this phenomenon is interdisciplinary, where Mental Health Nursing stands out, guided by the Tidal Model, which is based on personal history for the reconstruction of meanings after the death of a loved one, favoring their adaptation through care. Conclusions: The approach to the continuing bonds from the Tidal Model favors adaptation to grief centered on the person and their history by strengthening the reconstruction of meanings that improve quality of life through care focused on the needs of the current experience.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • 1. Smith MJ, Liehr P. Middle Range Theory for Nursing. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2018 (4a ed.).
  • 2. Rodríguez-Álvaro M, García-Hernández AM, Tole-do-Rosell C. Hacia una visión constructivista del duelo. Index de Enfermería 2008; 17(3):193-196. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1132-12962008000 300009.
  • 3. Neimeyer R, Prigerson H, Davies B. Mourning and Meaning. American Behavioral Scientist 2002; 46(2): 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640 2236676.
  • 4. Root B, Klass D, Exline JJ. The Role of Continu-ing Bonds in Coping With Grief: Overview and Future Directions. Death Studies 2014; 38:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2012.712608.
  • 5. Barker P, Buchanan-Barker P. The Tidal Model. A guide for mental health professionals. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2005.
  • 6. Rodríguez-Álvaro M, Brito-Brito PR, García-Hernández AM, Aguirre-Jaime A, Fernandez-Gutiérrez DA. The Grieving Nursing Diagnoses in the Primary Healthcare Setting. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2019; 30(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12202.
  • 7. Field NP, Packman W, Ronen R, Pries A, Davies B, Kramer R. Type of Continuing Bonds Expression and Its Comforting Versus Distressing Nature: Impli-cations for Adjustment Among Bereaved Mothers. Death Studies 2013; 37:889–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2012.692458.
  • 8. García-Hernández AM. Continuidad de vínculos y espiritualidad en padres que perdieron hijos. Revista ENE de Enfermería. 2019; 13(3). http://ene-enfermeria.org/ojs/index.php/ENE/arti cle/view/907/perder-hijo.
  • 9. García-Hernández AM, Brito-Brito PR, Rodríguez-Álvaro M, Gutiérrez-Fernández DA, Marrero-González CM, Martínez Alberto CE y Martínez-Esquivel D. Adaptación al español y validación de la Escala de Continuidad de Vínculos (ECV) con el ser querido fallecido. Cultura de los Cuidados 2021; 25(60). http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2021. 60.19.
  • 10. Barker P, Buchanan-Barker P. Mental Health Nursing and the Politics of Recovery: A Global Reflection. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2011; 25(5):350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2011.03.009.
  • 11. Neimeyer R. Meaning reconstruction in bereave-ment: Development of a research program. Death Studies 2019; 43(2):79-91. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07481187.2018.1456620.
  • 12. Barboza J, Seedall R, Neimeyer R. Meaning Co-Construction: Facilitating Shared Family Meaning-Making in Bereavement. Family Process 2022; 61(1):7-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12671.
  • 13. Neimeyer R, Baldwin S, Gillies J. Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning: mitigating compli-cations in bereavement. Death Studies 2006; 30:715-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811806008 48322.
  • 14. Hoppes S, Segal R. Reconstructing meaning through occupation after the death of a family member: Accommodation, assimilation, and continuing bonds. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2010; 64:133–141. https://doi.org/10.5014/ ajot.64.1.133.
  • 15. Bogensperger J, Lueger-Schuster B. Losing a child: finding meaning in bereavement. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2014; 5(1):22910. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.22910.
  • 16. Meert KL, Eggly S, Kavanaugh K, Berg RA, Wessel DL, Newth CJL, Shanley TP, Harrison R, Dalton H, Michael Dean J, Doctor A, Jenkins T, Park CL. Meaning making during parent-physician be-reavement meetings after a child's death. Health Psychology 2015; 34(4):453–461. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/hea0000153.
  • 17. Nance DC. El modelo Tidal: Un alternativo para la enfermería psiquiátrica. Cultura de los Cuidados 2019; 23(55). http://dx.doi.org/10.141 98/cuid.2019.55.24.
  • 18. Freitas RJM, Araujo JL, Moura NA, Oliveira GYM, Feitosa RMM, Monteiro ARM. Nursing care in mental health based on the TIDAL MODEL: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020; 73(2):e20180177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0177.
  • 19. Barker P, Buchanan-Barker P. The Tidal Model of Mental Health Recovery and Reclamation: Application in Acute Care Settings. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 2010; 31:171–180. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840903276696.
  • 20. Kusdemir S, Oudshoorn A, Ndayisenga JP. A critical analysis of the Tidal Model of Mental Health Recovery. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2022; 36:34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.20 21.10.012.
  • 21. García-Hernández AM, Rodríguez-Álvaro M, Brito-Brito R, Fernández-Gutiérrez D, Martínez-Alberto C, Marrero-González C. Duelo Adaptativo, No Adaptativo y Continuidad de Vínculos 2021; 15(1). http://ene-enfermeria.org/ojs/index.php/EN E/article/view/1242.
  • 22. Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, Takáo Lopes C. Nursing diagnoses. Definitions and classification 2021-2023. New York: Thieme; 2021(12  ed.).
  • 23. Cook NR, Phillips BN, Sadler D. The Tidal Model as experienced by patients and nurses in a regional forensic unit. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005; 12(5):536-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2850.2005.00872.x.
  • 24. O’Donovan A. Patient-centred care in acute psychi-atric admission units: reality or rhetoric? J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007; 14(6):542-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01125.x.
  • 25. Savaşan A, Çam O. The effect of the psychiatric nursing approach based on the Tidal Model on coping and self-esteem in people with alcohol dependency: a randomized trial. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017; 31(3):274-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.apnu.2017.01.002.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet