Reactions against farm animal abuseThe role of animal attitude and speciesism

  1. Andrea Vera 1
  2. Cristina Ruiz 1
  3. Ana María Martín 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Journal:
Acción psicológica

ISSN: 1578-908X

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: Investigación aplicada en psicología jurídica y forense

Volume: 20

Issue: 2

Pages: 29-42

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Acción psicológica

Abstract

The defense of animal rights has contributed to questioning the relationship between humans and animals focusing on animal abuse by humans. Current Spanish law has been reformed to safeguard animals that are either protected fauna or that live under human control, no longer considering them as things but as sentient beings. The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship of speciesism and animal attitudes with people’s perceptions of farm animal abuse, considering the role of gender and place of residence and controlling social desirability. A sample of 457 people, aged between 18 and 73 years old, 73% women, participated in this study. There were 63.7% of participants who lived in urban areas and the rest in rural areas of a territory highly protected by environmental law. They answered an online questionnaire including scenarios of farm animal abuse, the Animal Attitude Scale, Speciesism Scale and Social Desirability Scale. The results showed that negative perceptions of farm animal abuse and the willingness to intervene to stop it were more related to animal attitude than to speciesism. Furthermore, although participants living in rural areas leaned more towards speciesism, they did not have more negative attitudes than those living in urban areas. Theresults are discussed in terms of whether the law should consider all animals alike, irrespective of people’s perceptions, as with different human ethnicities and genders or whether distinctions should be made redefining animal instrumentality in terms ofbiodiversity and sustainability.

Bibliographic References

  • Amiot, C. E. & Bastian, B. (2017). Solidarity with Animals: Assessing a Relevant Dimension of Social Identification with Animals. PLoS ONE 12(1), Article e0168184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168184
  • Amiot, C. E., Sukhanova, K., Greenaway, K. H., & Bastian, B. (2017). Does Human–Animal Similarity Lower the Need to affirm Humans’ Superiority Relative to Animals? A Social Psychological Viewpoint. Anthrozoös, 30(3), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1335117
  • Bailey, S., Sims, V., & Chin, M. G. (2016). Predictors of View about Punishing Animal Abuse. Anthrozoös 29(1), 21–33: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.1064217
  • Bastian, B. Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. M. (2012). Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animal Used for Human Consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424291
  • Bègue L. & Vezirian K. (2022). Sacrificing Animals in the Name of Scientific Authority: The Relationship between Pro-Scientific Mindset and the Lethal Use of Animals in Biomedical Experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(10), 1483–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211039413
  • Bjerke, T., Ødegårdstuen, T. S., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). Attitudes Toward Animals among Norwegian Adolescents. Anthrozoös, 11(2), 79–86. http://doi.org/10.2752/089279398787000742
  • Bernuz, M. J. & María, G. A. (2022). Public Opinion about Punishment for Animal Abuse in Spain: Animal Attributes as Predictors of attitudes Toward Penalties. Anthrozoös, 35(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.2012341
  • Caviola, L. & Capraro, V. (2020). Liking but Devaluing Animals Emotional and Deliberative Paths to Speciesism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 194855061989395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619893959
  • Caviola, L., Everett., J. A. C., & Faber., N. S. (2019). The Moral Standing of Animals: Towards a Psychology of Speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(6), 1011–1029. http://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000182
  • Caviola, L., Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Teperman, E., Savulescu, J., & Faber, N. S. (2021). Utilitarianism for Animals, Kantianism for People? Harming Animals and humans for the Greater Good. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(5), 1008–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000988
  • Collado, S. & Sorrel, M. A. (2019). Children's Environmental Moral Judgments: Variations According to Type of Victim and Exposure to Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.005
  • Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1960). A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
  • Cudworth, E. (2015). Killing animals: Sociology, Species Relations and Institutionalized Violence. The Sociological Review, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12222
  • Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2014). Social dominance Orientation Connects Prejudicial Human-Human and Human-Animal Relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61-62, 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020
  • Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Loughnan, S., & Amiot, C. E. (2019). Rethinking Human-Animal Relations: The Critical Role of Social Psychology. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219864455
  • Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., Oliveira, A., & Milfont, T. L. (2018). Why are Women Less Likely to Support Animal Exploitation than Men? The Mediating Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.007
  • Gradidge, S., Alcañiz-Colomer, J., & Loughnan, S. (2023). Inhuman Animals: Moving Dehumanization into the Domain of Human-Animal Relations. Behavioral Sciences, 50, Article 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101249
  • Henry, B. C. (2004). The Relationship between Animal Cruelty, Delinquency, and Attitudes toward the Treatment of Animals. Society & Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 12(3), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568530042880677
  • Herzog, H. A., Betchart, N. S., & Pittman, R. B. (1991). Gender, Sex Role Orientation, and Attitudes toward Animals. Anthrozoös, 4(3), 184–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279391787057170
  • Herzog, H. A., Grayson, S., & McCord, D. (2015). Brief Measures of the Animal Attitude Scale. Anthrozoös, 28(1), 145–152. http://doi.org/10.2752/089279315X14129350721894
  • Hodson, G., Dhont, K., & Earle, M (2020). Devaluing Animals, “Animalistic” Humans, and People who Protect Animals. In K. Dhont & G. Hodson (Eds.), Why People Love and Exploit Animals: Bridging Insights from Academia and Advocacy (pp. 67–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351181440-5
  • Hoffarth, M. R., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2019). Political Conservatism and the Exploitation of Nonhuman Animals: An Application of System Justification Theory. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 858–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219843183
  • Kahane, G. & Caviola, L. (2023). Are the Folk Utilitarian About Animals? Philosophical Studies, 180, 1081–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-01833-2
  • Krings, V. C., Dhont, K., & Salme, A. (2021). The Moral Divide between High- And –Low-Status Animals: The Role of Human Supremacy Belief. Anthrozoös, 34(6), 787–802. http://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1926712
  • Kronhardt, G., Ayres, L., & Da Silva, A. F. (2021). Animal abuse: Profile or the Offender, Typology of Violence and Forms of Control. Derecho Animal: Forum of Animal Law Studies, 12(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.515
  • Martín, A. M., Hernández, B., Frías‐Armenta, M., & Hess, S. (2014). Why Ordinary People Comply with Environmental Laws: A Structural Model on Normative and Attitudinal Determinants of Illegal Anti‐Ecological Behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02062.x
  • Martín, A. M., Vera, A., Marrero, R. J., & Hernández, B. (2023). Bystanders’ Reactions to Animal Abuse in Relation to Psychopathy, Empathy with People and Empathy with Nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1124162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124162
  • Mata, F., Dos-Santos, M., & Cocksedge, J. (2023). Attitudinal and behavioural Differences Towards Farm Animal Welfare among Consumers in the BRIC Countries and the USA. Sustainability, 15, Article 3619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043619
  • Mota-Rojas, D., Whittaker, A. L., de la Vega, L. T., Ghezzi, M., Lezama-García, K., Domínguez-Oliva, A., Falcón, I., Casas-Alvarado, A., & Alonso-Spilsbury, M. (2023). Veganism and Animal Welfare, Scientific, Ethical, and Philosophical Arguments. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 11(2), Article 2023015. https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.23015
  • Nurse, A. (2013). Animal Harm: Perspectives on why People Harm and Kill Animals (ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315567174
  • Nurse, A. (2020). Masculinities and Animal Harm. Men and Masculinities, 23(5), 908–926. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X20965458
  • Piazza, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., & Seigerman, M. (2015). Rationalizing Meat Consumption: The 4Ns. Appetite, 91, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011
  • Plant, M., Van Schaik, P., Gullone, E., & Flynn, C. (2019). “It’s a Dog’s life”: Culture, Empathy, Gender, and Domestic Violence Predict Animal Abuse in Adolescents –Implications for Societal Health. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(10), 2110–2137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516659655
  • Rothgerber, H. & Rosenfeld, D. L. (2021), Meat-related Cognitive Dissonance: The Social Psychology of Eating Animals. Social Personality Psychology Compass, 15(5), Article 12592. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12592
  • Salmen, A. & Dhont, K. (2023). Animalizing Women and Feminizing (Vegan) Men: The Psychological Intersections of Sexism, Speciesism, Meat, and Masculinity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(2), Article e12717. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12717
  • Sevillano, V. & Fiske S. T. (2020). Animals as Social Groups: An Intergroup Relations Analysis of Human-Animal Conflicts. In K. Dhont & G. Hodson (Eds.), Why People Love and Exploit Animals: Bridging Insights from Academia and Advocacy (pp. 67–89). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351181440-5
  • Signal, T., Taylor, N., & Maclean, A. S. (2018). Pampered or Pariah: Does Animal Type Influence the Interaction between Animal Attitude and Empathy? Psychology, Crime, & Law, 24(5), 527–537. http://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1399394
  • Sims, K. K., Chin, M. G., & Yordon, R. E. (2007). Don’t Be Cruel: Assessing Beliefs about Punishments for Crimes against Animals. Anthrozoös 20(3), 251–259. http://doi.org/10.2752/089279307X224791
  • Suárez-Yera, C., Ordóñez-Carrasco, J. L., Sánchez-Castelló, M., & Rojas Tejada, A. J. (2021). Spanish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Animal Attitude Scale and the Speciesism Scale. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2021.0002
  • Teel. T. & Manfredo, M. J. (2010). Understanding the Diversity of Public Interest in Wildlife Conservation. Conservation Biology, 24(1), 128–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x
  • Vezirian, K. & Bègue, L. (2023). The Gender Gap in Animal Experimentation Support: The Mediating Roles of Empathy and Speciesism. Anthrozoös, 36(6), 1115–1127. http://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2023.2243739
  • Vollum, S., Buffington-Vollum, J., & Longmire, D.R. (2004). Moral Disengagement and Attitudes about Violence Toward Animals. Society & Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies, 12(3), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568530042880668
  • Wyatt, T., van Uhm, D., & Nurse, A. (2020). Differentiating Criminal Networks in the Illegal Wildlife Trade: Organized, Corporate, and Disorganized Crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 23, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-020-09385-9
  • Zalaf, A. & Egan, V. (2020). Attitudes to Animals in Cyprus and the UK: Associations with Personality, Delinquency, and Morality. Anthrozoös, 33(5), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1799549
Data source: Dialnet