Las desigualdades de género en los resultados educativos en la enseñanza primaria en España

  1. Bianchi, Daniel 1
  2. Cabrera, Leopoldo 1
  3. Sicilia, Gabriela 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Laguna
    info

    Universidad de La Laguna

    San Cristobal de La Laguna, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01r9z8p25

Konferenzberichte:
CIMIE23. Scientific evidence that improves educational outcomes

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Art: Konferenz-Beitrag

DOI: 10.25145/C.CIMIE.2023.01 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRIULL editor

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • -ACCUEE (2022). Evaluaciones de Diagnóstico 3º de Primaria, 6º de Primaria y 4º de la ESO. Datos de Canarias. Cursos 16-17; 17-18 y18-19
  • .-Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating Gender Equality: Cross-national Gender Stratification and Mathematical Performance. Sociology of Education, 66(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112795
  • -Baye, A., & Monseur, C. (2016). Gender differences in variability and extreme scores in an international context. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/1 0.1186/s40536-015-0015-x
  • -Bodovski, K., Munoz, I.G., Byun, S., & Chykina, V. (2020). Do Education System Characteristics Moderate the Socioeconomic, Gender and Immigrant Gaps in Math and Science Achievement? International Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(2), 122-154. https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.2020.4807
  • -Cabrera, L.; Cabrera, B. (2008). Heterogeneidad de centros y desigualdad de rendimientos educativos. Tempora, (11), 61–99, diciembre de 2008. https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/14233
  • -Carrell, S. E., Page, M. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. The Quarterly journal of economics, 125(3), 1101-1144. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
  • -Gevrek, Z. E., Gevrek, D., & Neumeier, C. (2020). Explaining the gender gaps in mathematics achievement and attitudes: The role of societal gender equality. Economics of Education Review, 76, 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.101978
  • - Hey, V. (2006). The politics of performative resignification: Translating Judith Butler’s theoretical discourse and its potential for a sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 439457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690600802956
  • -Huguet, P., & Regner, I. (2007). Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 545-560. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/00220663.99.3.545
  • -Hwang, N., & Fitzpatrick, B. (2021). Student–teacher gender matching and academic achievement. AERA Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211040058
  • -IEA. (2020). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). 2019. Amsterdam: International Association for theEvaluation of Educational Achievement. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/
  • -Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2012). School context and the gender gap in educational achievement. American sociological review, 77(3), 463-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412440802
  • -Meinck, S., & Brese, F. (2019). Trends in gender gaps: Using 20 years of evidence from TIMSS. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0076-3
  • -Mendick, H. (2005). Mathematical stories: why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS-level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000294192
  • -MEyFP (2022). Sistema estatal de indicadores de la educación 2022. Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa (INEE). ISBN (en línea):978-84-369-6062-4. https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:afaf513f-0cec-4e99-a05a-e2b222d0493f/seie-2022.pdf
  • -MEyFP (2023). Las cifras de la educación en España. Curso 2020-2021 (edición 2023). Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa (INEE). https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:32e046c1-6d54-4a46aeef-5e68c1443ce8/c2-pdf.pdf
  • -Raabe, I. J., Boda, Z., & Stadtfeld, C. (2019). The social pipeline: How friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap. Sociology of Education, 92(2), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718824095
  • -Renold, E., & Allan, A. (2006). Bright and beautiful: High achieving girls, ambivalent femininities, and the feminization of success in the primary school. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 27(4), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300600988606
  • -Rosén, M., Steinmann, I., & Wernersson, I. (2022). “Gender differences in school achievement”. En: Nilsen et al. International handbook of comparative large-scale studies in education: Perspectives, methods and findings (pp. 1-48). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8_46-1
  • -van Hek, M.; Buchmann, C.; & Kraaykamp, G. (2019). Educational Systems and Gender Differences in Reading: A Comparative Multilevel Analysis. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy054
  • -Scheiler, A. (2008). “Student learning outcomes in mathematics from a gender perspective: what does the international PISA Assessment tell us?”. En: Tembon & Fort. Girl’s education in the 21st century (pp.41-52). Washington: Banco mundial.
  • -Youdell, D. (2005). Sex–gender–sexuality: how sex, gender and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools. Gender and Education, 17(3), 249-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145148