Valoración del procesamiento ortográfico en niños españoles con dislexiaEl papel de las unidades léxicas y subléxicas

  1. Rodrigo López, Mercedes
  2. Guzmán Rosquete, Remedios
  3. García Miranda, Eduardo
  4. Díaz Megolla, Alicia
  5. Estévez Monzó, Adelina
  6. Ortiz González, María del Rosario
  7. Hernández Valle, María Isabel
  8. Jiménez González, Juan Eugenio
  9. Hernández Expósito, Sergio
Revista:
Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

ISSN: 1696-2095

Any de publicació: 2004

Volum: 2

Número: 4

Pàgines: 105-126

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.25115/EJREP.V2I4.1153 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible

Resum

Introducción. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido examinar el papel de las unidades multiletras, tales como el morfema y la palabra completa, en el acceso al léxico, en niños españoles con dislexia. Método. Para llevarlo a cabo, se seleccionó una muestra la cual se distribuyó en tres grupos diferentes: 1) Un grupo experimental formado por 18 niños con dificultad lectora (DAL); (2) Un grupo control de 27 lectores normales de la misma edad que el grupo de lectores con dificultad (BL); y (3) Un grupo control formado por 15 niños más jóvenes y del mismo nivel lector que los lectores con dificultad (NL). Se utilizó una tarea de selección de homófonos y de comprensión de raíces morfológicas. Se analizaron los resultados teniendo en cuenta medidas de exactitud y de latencia para la tarea de comprensión morfológica y de exactitud para la tarea de homófonos. Resultados. Los resultados mostraron que había un déficit en el procesamiento léxico en los niños con dificultad lectora ya que su rendimiento era más bajo que el de los niños más jóvenes con el mismo nivel lector. Sin embargo, cuando analizamos la latencia de la tarea de comprensión morfológica, los resultados mostraron que esta latencia disminuía, independientemente de los grupos, a medida que avanzaban las presentaciones, aunque el rendimiento del grupo de lectores normales, emparejados en edad con los lectores con dificultad, era significativamente mejor que el de los otros dos grupos.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Alegría, J. (1985). Por un enfoque psicolingüístico de la lectura y sus dificultades. [Towards a psycholinguistic approach to reading and its disabilities.] Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29, 79-94.
  • Álvarez, C .J. de Vega, M. & Carreiras, M. (1998). La sílaba como unidad de activación léxica en la lectura de palabras trisílaba. [The syllable as a lexical activation unit in reading three-syllable words.] Psicothema , 10, 371-386.
  • Álvarez, C.J., Carreiras, M. & Taft M. (2001). Syllables and Morphemes: Contrasting Frequency Effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 27, 2, 545-555.
  • Backman, J., Bruck, M. Hebert, M. & Seidenberg, M.S. (1984) Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38 (1), 114-133.
  • Beech , J. and Awaida, M. (1992). Lexical and non-lexical routes: A comparison between normally achieving and poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 3, 196-206.
  • Bruck, M. (1993). Component spelling skills of college students with childhood diagnosis of dyslexia. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 171-184.
  • Bryant, P.E. & Goswami, U. (1986). Strengths and Weaknesses of the Reading Level Design: A Comment on Backman, Mamen and Ferguson. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 101-103.
  • Catell, R.B. & Catell, A. K. S. (1989). Test de Factor “g”. Escala 2. [“G” factor test. Scale 2] (Cordero, de la Cruz & Seisdedos, Trans.) Madrid: T.E.A., Ediciones (Original work published 1950).
  • Cirrin, F.M. (1984). Lexical search speed in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 158-175.
  • Coltheart, M. (1987) Lexical access in simple reading task. In G. Underwood (Ed.) Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B. & Ruano, E. (1996). Batería de Evaluación de los procesos lectores de los niños de Educación Primaria. (PROLEC) (Assessment test of reading skills for children). Madrid, Spain:T.E.A.
  • Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
  • de Vega, M., Carreiras, M. Gutiérrez Calvo, M. & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1990). Lectura y Comprensión: una perspectiva cognitiva. [Reading and Comprehension: a cognitive perspective.] Madrid. Alianza Psicología
  • Domínguez, A. & Cuetos, F. (1992) Desarrollo de las habilidades de reconocimiento de palabras en niños con distinta competencia lectora. [Development of word recognition skills in children with a different reading competency.] Cognitiva, 4, 193-208.
  • Domínguez, A., Cuetos, F. & de Vega, M. (1993). Efectos diferenciales de la frecuencia silábica: dependencia del tipo de prueba y características de los estímulos. [Differential effects of syllabic frequency: depending on the type of test and characteristics of the stimuli.] Estudios de Psicología, 50, 5-31.
  • Domínguez, A., Cuetos, F. & Seguí, J. (2000). Morphological processing in word recognition: A review with particular reference to Spanish data. Psicológica, 21, 375-401
  • Domínguez, A., Seguí, J. & Cuetos, F. (2002). The time-course of inflectional morphological priming. Linguistics 40, 2, 235-259.
  • Elbro, C. & Petersen, T. (1993). Udviklingsarbejde om undersogelse af ordblinde elevers laesestrategier. Kobenhavn: Det tvaerkommunale projektsamvirke.
  • Elbro, C. & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209-240.
  • Ellis, N. (1981). Visual and name coding in dyslexic children. Psychological Research, 43, 201-218.
  • Eheri, L.C. & Wilce, L.S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less-skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3-18.
  • Frith, U. (1985) Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K.E. Patterson, J.C. Mar-shall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface Dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.
  • Jiménez, J.E. & Rodrigo, M. (1994). Is it true that the Differences in Reading Performance between Students with and without LD cannot be explained by IQ? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 3, 155-163.
  • Jiménez, J.E. Guzmán, R. & Artiles, C. (1997). Efectos de la frecuencia silábica posicional en el reconocimiento visual de palabras y aprendizaje de la lectura. [Effects of positional syllabic frequency on visual word recognition and learning to read.] Cognitiva , 1, 3-27.
  • Jiménez, J.E. (1997). A Reading-Level Design Study of Phonemic Processes Underlying Reading Disabilities in a Transparent Orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 9, 23-40.
  • Jiménez, J.E., Díaz, A., Ortiz, M.R., Rodrigo, M., García, E., Guzmán, R., Hernández-Valle, I., Estévez, A. & González, G. (2002). SICOLE: A Tutorial Intelligent System in Assessing and Remedial education of Dyslexia in Spanish 2002. Poster session presented in the annual meeting of the International Dyslexia Association. Washington, DC, E.E.U.U.
  • Jiménez, J.E., Álvarez, C.J., Estévez, A. & Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Onset-Rime Units in Visual Word Recognition in Spanish Normal Readers and Children With Reading Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15 (3), 135-141.
  • Johnston R.S. & Thompsom, G.B. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in chil-dren’s reading a product of instructional approach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 131-145.
  • Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, V. & Keating K. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly, too: Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 103-119.
  • Manis, F.R. (1985). Acquisition of word identification in normal and disabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 1, 78-90.
  • Perfetti, C.A. (1985).Reading ability. New York. Oxford University Press.
  • Perfetti, C.A. (1986). Continuities in Reading Acquisition. Reading Skill and Reading Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. 7, 1, 11-21.
  • Perfetti, C.A. (1989). There are generalized abilities and one of them is reading. In L.B. Res-nick (Ed.). Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glasse. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
  • Perfetti, C.A. & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension Skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 461-489.
  • Rack, J.P. Snowling, M.J. & Olson, R.K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia. A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 20-53.
  • Rayner, K. (1988). Word recognition cues in children: The relative use of graphemic cues, and grapheme-phoneme correspondence rules. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 473-479.
  • Rodrigo, M. & Jiménez, J.E. (1999). An analysis of the word naming errors of normal readers and reading disabled children in Spanish. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 2, 180-197.
  • Rodrigo, M. & Jiménez, J.E. (2000). IQ or phonological recoding in explaining differences between reading disabled and normal readers in word recognition. Evidence from a naming task. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 00: 1-14.
  • Sánchez-Casas, R. M. (1996). Lexical Access in Visual Word Recognition: the Contribution Word Form. In M. Carreiras, J.E. García-Albea & Sebastián Gallés, N. (eds.), Language Processing in Spanish. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Share, D. C., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: A model of acquisition and individual differences. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1-7.
  • Seymour, P.H.K. (1987). Individual cognitive analysis of competent and impaired reading. British Journal of Special Education, 2, 45-54.
  • Seymour, P.H.K. & Porpodas, C. (1980). Lexical and non-lexical processing of spelling in dyslexia. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Spelling, 443-473. London: Academic Press.
  • Seymour, P.H.K. & MacGregor, C. J. (1984). Developmental dyslexia: A cognitive experimental analysis of phonological, morphemic and visual impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 43-82.
  • Siegel, L.S. (1986). Phonological deficits in children with reading disabilities. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 2, 1, 45-54.
  • Siegel, L.S. & Faux, D. (1989). Acquisition of certain grapheme-phoneme correspondences in normally achieving disabled readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 37-52.
  • Siegel, L.S. & Ryan, E.B. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 28-37.
  • Siegel, L.S. & Ryan, E.B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973-980.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading. Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 4, 360-407.
  • Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden variety poor readers: The phonological-core variance-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604.
  • Taft, M. & Forster, K.I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15 (6), 607-620.
  • Torneus, M. (1987). The importance of metaphonological and metamorphological abilities for different phases of reading development. Paper presented at The Third World Congress of Dyslexia, Brete.
  • Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read and spell. In PB Gough, LC Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Valle, F. (1989). Errores en lectura y escritura. [Errors in reading and writing.] Cognitiva. 2 (1), 35-63.
  • Working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973-980.
  • Wagner, R.K. & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skill. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet